Men and flip-flops isn't a good look in the fashion stakes

2
Skip to next photo
1/1
Show caption
1/1
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.

“PLEASE don’t wear those.”

I know it’s not my place to tell my husband what to wear - it’s not as though I’m exquisitely turned out - but you have to draw the line somewhere.

He’s become inseparable from a pair of leather flip flops. I can hear them flip-flopping around the house, in the kitchen, along the hallway, up the stairs…even when he’s outside - I can hear the leather slapping the flesh of the heel, flip flop, flip flop. It’s driving me mad.

I wouldn’t care if they looked good, but they don’t. Men’s feet are not the most appealing part of the body - pale. often hairy, yeti-like: they don’t belong on public display. Especially not size 12s like my husband’s.

As far as I can remember, flip flops have never made a mark in the fashion stakes. But this summer they’ve been highlighted as a top seasonal trend, thanks in part to A-list stars including Bradley Cooper and Jonathan Bailey heading out in them. ‘The long-held perception on flip flops has started to shift,’ says men’s style magazine Valet. ‘Today’s flip flops are more refined, often made from premium materials and designed with a streamlined silhouette that elevates them from dorm-room default to genuinely stylish summer essential.’

I’ve just Googled Bridgerton actor Jonathan wearing his and - A-list or not - it ain’t a good look. Bradley’s aren’t as close up, but even pictured from afar, they don’t do much for him either. Whoever is wearing them you still get a set of knobbly, prehensile toes sticking out of a trouser leg.

Even Bradley Cooper can't make flip-flops look good. Picture: Ian West/PAEven Bradley Cooper can't make flip-flops look good. Picture: Ian West/PA

To give them a leg-up in the fashion stakes, flip flops are now being called thong sandals, which is hardly the most appealing name, and some of them have a gap, like a small inlet, between the big toe and the others. Even the gloriously beautiful feet of Michelangelo’s David couldn’t give a good spin on these things.

To my mind, flip flops - both for men and women - belong on the beach. I’ve worn many a pair at Sandsend, those think plastic ones where you can feel the pain of every pebble as you hobble towards the sea. But I haven’t worn them beyond the shoreline of this country for a reason - they don’t look great on women either. I once went to an event at a local secondary school and the teacher giving the talk was perched on a stool wearing flip flops - it’s not just about how it looked, I also thought it far too casual for the occasion.

Aesthetics aside, flip flops were certainly the wrong choice of footwear for my husband to help break up a neighbour’s shed.

So I insisted he remove them, and he did, but what did he change into? Not a pair of sturdy boots, but sandals.

Sandals aren’t a great look for blokes either. You still get the toes poking out of trousers. They look slightly better worn with shorts, but only slightly.

Thankfully, he doesn’t own a pair of the most grotesque footwear known to mankind - sliders. Now these ugly slip-ons really are the pits. They are as elegant as a surgical boot. Bizarrely, they are often worn with socks, which looks ridiculous.

It’s okay at home, I guess, but when out and about - in the office, at the supermarket, at the cinema, in restaurants and cafes - do we want to see one another’s feet? Whatever the weather, we should keep them under wraps.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos