Gary Mills launches York City goals quest

York City manager Gary Mills

York City manager Gary Mills

First published in Sport York Press: Photograph of the Author by , Sports reporter

YORK City manager Gary Mills lamented a striker shortage after watching his side go down 2-1 at fellow Blue Square Bet Premier strugglers Forest Green Rovers.

The Minstermen slipped to sixth bottom in the table after Saturday’s defeat with none of the club’s recognised forwards – Michael Rankine, Leon Constantine and Michael Gash – having now netted in open play for nine matches.

Gash failed to make the bench at the New Lawn with Mills even pairing midfielder Alex Lawless and winger Peter Till in attack for the last 20 minutes of Saturday’s game after withdrawing Constantine and Rankine.

On-loan frontman Mark Beesley, meanwhile, has been sent back to Fleetwood Town, following non-contract signing David Dowson out of the door, as the City chief looks to clear room to bolster his options in the final third of the pitch.

“The situation we are in is that I have come into the club with a lack of strikers,” Mills pointed out.

“It possibly needs to be addressed and we need to get people fit if they are going to play because you can’t play if you’re not fit.

“It did not concern me putting Alex Lawless and Peter Till up front at all.

“We have got to make the most of what we have got and they are good players, who know the game.

“That’s the position we are in and they kept the ball well up there, making things difficult for their centre-halves.

“People might raise their eyebrows because I put them up there but Michael Rankine wasn’t having the best of games and was drifting out of the match even more.

“We have created plenty of chances in the last two games but strikers don’t come easy. I feel we need one or two to help us out and get us goals from the chances we are creating.”

Lawless grabbed a consolation for City within seconds of being pushed forward and also went close to scoring on other occasions but Mills is unlikely to make the former Forest Green midfielder a permanent fixture in his front-line, saying: “He’s a good midfield player and the system I want to play gives him a licence to go and play alongside the striker.

“He’s capable of doing that, but the ball has got to stick up there a bit more.”

Mills was also irritated by the manner in which his side conceded goals in the fourth minute and just before the hour mark, saying: “We conceded a goal the first time the ball went into our box.

“We did not win the first header or the second ball from their free-kick and it ended up in the back of our net.

“You have to defend better than that because it was just one punt into our box and one header.

“They only had three shots all game and the second goal was also a sloppy one.”

Despite his team bossing possession for long spells, Mills also called for greater penetration but admitted that, three games into his reign, the players are still familiarising themselves with his methods.

He said: “The result was more disappointing than the performance. I thought we were the better side but we have lost the game.

“We kept the ball well but probably kept it too much and we did not open them up when we needed to.”

Added the City manager: “I want the players to keep the ball but there’s only so long you can keep it without opening teams up.

“We had opportunities to get down the sides and in between the full-backs and centre-halves, which we have worked on, but didn’t do that.

“It’s only the second game though that the players have played in the system I am looking for and nothing will become perfect over night.

“Rome wasn’t built in a day and we won’t panic.

“I won’t drop my head or have people feeling sorry for themselves because anybody who has seen us play the last two games would not say Kidderminster or Forest Green were better than us.”

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:47pm Mon 1 Nov 10

NotInOz says...

Another reasonably frank assessment by GM. I would agree that we kept the ball well and lacked penetration, however I didn't see too many opportunities to get down the sides and in between the full-backs and centre-halves, largely because none of the more forward players got into space or made themselves available to receive the ball. Constantine might as well not have been on the pitch. Rankine was too often out wide and on the few occassions we had a chance of a penetrating pass the ball was usually mis-controlled by Ranks. Lawless and JSmith were also quiet, in the first half at least. So we ended up playing the ball around the back 5, with some occassional passes into Racchi, who at least can control the ball and keep it for the team. I remember one time when we might have played a telling crosss into the box, except there were no York players there!
There were some encouraging signs and I don't think it's all doom and gloom, we need the team to get used to GM's new system and we need a front 3 capable of doing the job. Would hope to see Till and Carruthers as part of this front 3, with perhaps Racchi replacing JSmith in midfiled. Just need a poacher in the middle.
Another reasonably frank assessment by GM. I would agree that we kept the ball well and lacked penetration, however I didn't see too many opportunities to get down the sides and in between the full-backs and centre-halves, largely because none of the more forward players got into space or made themselves available to receive the ball. Constantine might as well not have been on the pitch. Rankine was too often out wide and on the few occassions we had a chance of a penetrating pass the ball was usually mis-controlled by Ranks. Lawless and JSmith were also quiet, in the first half at least. So we ended up playing the ball around the back 5, with some occassional passes into Racchi, who at least can control the ball and keep it for the team. I remember one time when we might have played a telling crosss into the box, except there were no York players there! There were some encouraging signs and I don't think it's all doom and gloom, we need the team to get used to GM's new system and we need a front 3 capable of doing the job. Would hope to see Till and Carruthers as part of this front 3, with perhaps Racchi replacing JSmith in midfiled. Just need a poacher in the middle. NotInOz
  • Score: 0

12:58pm Mon 1 Nov 10

Batman1 says...

What's happening with George Purcell ?
I thought we brought him in as a striker ? If fit, why not play him, he cannot do any worse than what's playing at the moment!
What's happening with George Purcell ? I thought we brought him in as a striker ? If fit, why not play him, he cannot do any worse than what's playing at the moment! Batman1
  • Score: 0

1:25pm Mon 1 Nov 10

josephheller says...

Batman1 wrote:
What's happening with George Purcell ?
I thought we brought him in as a striker ? If fit, why not play him, he cannot do any worse than what's playing at the moment!
Still out injured, will be for some time.
[quote][p][bold]Batman1[/bold] wrote: What's happening with George Purcell ? I thought we brought him in as a striker ? If fit, why not play him, he cannot do any worse than what's playing at the moment![/p][/quote]Still out injured, will be for some time. josephheller
  • Score: 0

1:51pm Mon 1 Nov 10

Batman1 says...

Seems to be taking a long time to heal for such a young lad ?
Seems to be taking a long time to heal for such a young lad ? Batman1
  • Score: 0

6:38pm Wed 3 Nov 10

football1111 says...

As far as i'm aware George is back to training and all has gone well with his operation after substaining an ankle injury in the Grimbsy game.I was talking to a friend last week and he said hopefully George will be back in the next few weeks.Lets hope when he does GM gives George a fare crack at the whip.My only concern is after reading some of the Braintree reports about George he is a striker that needs to roam the area and not be put out on the wing and left there as a 3 upfront and doing more of a defending role rather than a striker as GM only wants a big man in the middle will there be a place for George as he isn't big.I would like him to get his chance as i really was looking forward to watching him play for us this season.I hope his injury hasn't dashed his hopes of playing for us.Hope GM gives him a good run out when he's fit.
Hope he's back soon as we need goals
As far as i'm aware George is back to training and all has gone well with his operation after substaining an ankle injury in the Grimbsy game.I was talking to a friend last week and he said hopefully George will be back in the next few weeks.Lets hope when he does GM gives George a fare crack at the whip.My only concern is after reading some of the Braintree reports about George he is a striker that needs to roam the area and not be put out on the wing and left there as a 3 upfront and doing more of a defending role rather than a striker as GM only wants a big man in the middle will there be a place for George as he isn't big.I would like him to get his chance as i really was looking forward to watching him play for us this season.I hope his injury hasn't dashed his hopes of playing for us.Hope GM gives him a good run out when he's fit. Hope he's back soon as we need goals football1111
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree