Midfielder Alex Lawless ready for return to York City side for Kidderminster Harriers clash (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Midfielder Alex Lawless ready for return to York City side for Kidderminster Harriers clash
10:20am Friday 25th September 2009 in Sport
By Dave Flett, Sports reporter
York City midfielder Alex Lawless
KEY midfielder Alex Lawless is poised for a swift return to York City’s starting line-up.
An ill Lawless missed Tuesday night’s 2-2 draw with Cambridge United, but is expected to have made a full recovery in time for tomorrow’s home match with Kidderminster Harriers (3pm).
Centre-back Alan O’Hare has also suffered from the same bug, which meant he was not among the substitutes against Cambridge but the pair should both be available for another top-ten clash at Bootham Crescent.
City manager Martin Foyle said: “Alex Lawless is much better. He’s not had an infection or anything like that and we are looking for him to play tomorrow.”
Foyle is hoping a return for Lawless would mean the Minstermen’s midfield can retain possession better than they managed in the second period against Cambridge.
Former Wrexham player Levi Mackin, who filled in for Lawless, is the most likely candidate to make way, but Foyle added that all four midfielders might have done better on Tuesday night.
He said: “Levi was a little rusty, as is only natural because he’s not played a lot of football recently. He never lets you down, but the match was different to most of the others we have had this season.
“We needed a bit more pressing in some areas of the pitch from all four midfield players. We kept giving the ball away cheaply which means, against the better sides, you end up doing a lot of running and I thought we looked tired towards the end.”
Goalkeeper Michael Ingham is expected to be available despite limping with his recurring thigh problem towards the end of the Cambridge game.
But Foyle added that he would only play the ex-Northern Ireland international if he was 100 per cent fit and, if he was, then would probably continue his policy of leaving reserve ’keeper Josh Mimms off the bench.
The City chief said: “We gave Michael the day off yesterday, but I expect him to be okay. We will only play him if he’s 100 per cent fit though.
“If he’s 80 or 90 per cent then that won’t be good enough and I will play Josh instead. I wouldn’t worry about pitching him in. Josh has played two or three games for me and never let me down once.”
Like Cambridge, Foyle considers Kidderminster to be play-off contenders this season, adding: “They will be in the top eight at the end of the season so it’s another big game for us that we don’t want to lose. We want to take the game to them and hopefully get the first goal.”
City (probable): Ingham, Purkiss, Parslow, Sangare, Meredith, Smith, Lawless, Barrett, Ferrell, Gash, Brodie. Subs: McGurk, Mackin, Nelthorpe, Rankine, Pacquette.
Kidderminster (probable): Coleman, Courtney, Caines, Riley, Baker, McDermott, Finnigan, McPhee, Smikle, Knights, Barnes-Homer. Subs: Hadley, Matthews, Dolman, Hayward, Farrell.
Referee: Paul Curry (Essex).
Kick-off: 3pm.
Comments(15)
rogue84
says...
11:17am Fri 25 Sep 09
once again i can't be there due to work, but if Tuesday's performance can just be stepped up a gear we'll hopefully keep this home record going with a win. good luck lads, see you all at Tamworth on the 6th!
PDH
says...
11:19am Fri 25 Sep 09
Frank Black
says...
11:34am Fri 25 Sep 09
Imp
says...
11:41am Fri 25 Sep 09
|
There were some negative comments about Mimms in a previous thread, which I think are unfair. He's a promising young lad who has put in some good performances for us. If he was the finished article, he wouldn't be backup at a BSP club.
Imp
says...
11:44am Fri 25 Sep 09
PDH wrote:Why can't he be 100% fit? Do you have a copy of his medical report?
How on eath could ingham be 100% fit? and if he plays what a stupid idea i would be to not have a sub goalie
|
Personally, while he has this issue I'd also want a backup on the bench. But managers have to stand by their decisions. It's easy for us, sat at home/standing in the ground to say what should or shouldn't be done. Who should play. How we should play. What substitutions should be made, and when. What the bench should look like. Whether highlights should be on the web. But we aren't the ones whose employment rests on those decisions. I think people should remember that.
tonyg
says...
12:02pm Fri 25 Sep 09
I rate Makin very much, but agree with MF that he was a bit rusty.
Their is always playing ferrell in the center of midfield which is actually his natural position, so we could accommodate Nelthorpe.
Ingham
Meredith
Mcgurk
Sangare
Purkiss
Ferrell
Flawless
Barratt
Smith
Brodie
Gash
That would be my team.
tips
says...
1:21pm Fri 25 Sep 09
Come on Martin think about this a bit more it's not being negative but is sensible surely
Imp
says...
2:04pm Fri 25 Sep 09
tips wrote:It's a calculated gamble.
I personally think it is essential to have a substitute goalkeeper on the bench.It is the one position in the team where a specialist is required. Come on Martin think about this a bit more it's not being negative but is sensible surely
Basically, keepers areb statistically far, far less likely to get injured during a match than outfield players. It's a real rarity. So some managers choose to use that extra sub place to leave them more outfield options on the bench.
|
Normally, I'm fine with it. But when your 1st choice has an underlying problem, it's pretty risky. Apparently McGurk is a decent keeper (in much the same way as Warnock used to have no sub keeper because Jagielka could do a decent job).
iandwightbenton
says...
2:05pm Fri 25 Sep 09
Whats the point on having 2 centre backs on the bench, are you really going to bring them both on (McGurk and O Hare) ???????
OLD - HEAD
says...
2:40pm Fri 25 Sep 09
tonyg
says...
4:00pm Fri 25 Sep 09
OLD - HEAD wrote:Well you can only say that if your actually there day-in-day-out at the training ground.
We desperately need Lawless back in the team, for Mackin is not in the same league. But to be honest neither Ferrell,Barrett or Smith were any great shakes on Tuesday, thats why our midfield was over-run by Paul Carden and his colleagues. I have now given up complaining about Foyles persistence in not having a substitute goalkeeper on the bench, if I was Mimms I would feel insulted. When Ingham eventually gets carried off, and we finish up getting stuffed, then Foyle will no doubt be greeted with howls of abuse, until then "Keep Lucky Martin".
Mcgurk could be a better keeper than josh mimms.
And foyle said ingham would only be played if 100% fit, so there is no more reason to have a sub goalkeeper on the bench.
OLD - HEAD
says...
5:25pm Fri 25 Sep 09
PDH
says...
11:18pm Fri 25 Sep 09
Imp wrote:No Imp i dont have a copy of his medical report, but i do have a brain, if a player is carrying a injury, as ingham is, he cannot possibly be 100% fit, so it would be perfectly sensible to have a sub goalie, we nearly came unstuck because of this on tues.
PDH wrote: How on eath could ingham be 100% fit? and if he plays what a stupid idea i would be to not have a sub goalieWhy can't he be 100% fit? Do you have a copy of his medical report? | Personally, while he has this issue I'd also want a backup on the bench. But managers have to stand by their decisions. It's easy for us, sat at home/standing in the ground to say what should or shouldn't be done. Who should play. How we should play. What substitutions should be made, and when. What the bench should look like. Whether highlights should be on the web. But we aren't the ones whose employment rests on those decisions. I think people should remember that.
PDH
says...
3:04pm Sat 26 Sep 09

Turnstile_Yorkie says...
10:43am Fri 25 Sep 09
Lawless=Flawless
Will give us the type of player we severly missed on tuesday night