Contest to find new role for The Guildhall (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Contest to find new role for The Guildhall in York
8:29am Tuesday 8th May 2012 in News
By Richard Catton, richard.catton@thepress.co.uk
The Guildhall reflecting in the River Ouse
THE world’s most innovative architects are to be invited to submit plans for a major redevelopment of York’s historic Guildhall.
City of York Council decided in December it wanted to limit its use of the Guildhall and instead turn the iconic river-front building over to the “benefit of the city and its residents”.
Now council chiefs will meet on Tuesday next week to consider launching the “Open Ideas” competition, which would be run by the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), and is expected to attract national and international high-profile architects.
The cost of running the competition would be around £35,000, but the council said it hoped that by inviting ideas from architectural practices across the world, “the city would see the benefits that could be realised from a range of high quality and innovative options”.
Coun Julie Gunnell, cabinet member for Corporate Services, said: “The Guildhall and associated spaces are a significant part of York’s cultural and civic history and we want to ensure that it can continue to play a key role in the city in the future.
“Independent assessment of the site confirms that significant development and modernisation of elements of the complex will be necessary to make the most of the buildings and riverside area for the future.”
The winning bid would have to take into account the Guildhall’s Grade II listed council chamber and its Grade I riverside committee rooms.
A recent report on the cultural and historic significance of the building said that the bombing of the Guildhall during the Second World War and subsequent rebuilding meant it was not a ‘pristine medieval’ site but acknowledged that the complex was of ‘national significance’.
According to other key findings the “do nothing option” does not exist because of the future cost to the council and the need to secure use for the Guildhall and ensure there is no long-term deterioration in condition.
Comments(11)
mickrick
says...
9:07am Tue 8 May 12
Ignatius Lumpopo
says...
10:54am Tue 8 May 12
YorkToff
says...
11:21am Tue 8 May 12
BL2
says...
12:12pm Tue 8 May 12
meme
says...
12:19pm Tue 8 May 12
How about opening up the underground walk to the river to the public as well
It has to be a hotel!!
pedalling paul
says...
12:46pm Tue 8 May 12
BL2 wrote:Or better still as undercover storage for posh bikes....!
A car park for posh cars? :-)
YorkToff
says...
2:56pm Tue 8 May 12
pedalling paul wrote:I'd have all bikes crushed and recycled into something useful - cars.
BL2 wrote:Or better still as undercover storage for posh bikes....!
A car park for posh cars? :-)
LibDem
says...
5:27pm Tue 8 May 12
The report talks only of ”a centre for creative / digital businesses”. However we appear to be getting one of those at the Bonding Warehouse site anyway.
Although the site, taken as a whole, does offer opportunities, anyone who has Google Earth will readily be able to see that access is a major problem with the only obvious “solution” being to demolish Lendal Cellars & the Post Office building (a rather well used facility).
Having an architectural competition smacks of desperation (and a staggering insensitivity to cost issues – the £35,000 they will be giving to RIBA and as prizes is equal to the cost of keeping facilities like the Beckfield Lane recycling centre open).
And at the end of the day all the Council will have will be a design plan. Still needing several millions in investment to bring it to a reality.
“Blue sky” thinking often produces “red ink” expenditure levels. Unless there is a comprehensive planning brief written then a competition could produce an impractical solution dogged by raised expectation levels.
The last competition of this sort organised by the Council resulted in the Parliament Street remodelling 25 years ago – fountain, cycle racks, splash palace and all.
And no “Common Hall Lane” will not be opened up as a public access. The roof level is too low and it’s flooded for some of the year. … nor is a hotel on the site very likely now; the Judges Lodgings – which does have some car parking space – has struggled recently at a nearby location.
The Council should retain the Guildhall as its democratic base and let out spare space there – and at its Station Rise HQ – on a commercial basis to help pay for maintenance costs.
pedalling paul
says...
8:01am Wed 9 May 12
Nowt wrong with lots of cycle racks LibDem.
sperare e coraggio
says...
7:23am Thu 10 May 12
It is an act of desperation by an administration with no money and no ideas.
The solution is to find a suitable use for the building - one that pays! Not try to remodel the architecture - which can't be done anyway because it is Listed as being of special architectural and historical interest.
The competition will waste £35,000 and produce nothing of any practical or affordable use.
twigger says...
8:41am Tue 8 May 12