News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


News coverage for York, Ryedale, East Yorkshire, Harrogate and Selby.

Popular topics: Community Stadium | York Wheel | Germany Beck | ftr | Queen's visit


Disease killed soldiers from Oliver Cromwell’s army discovered in Fishergate


ARCHAEOLOGISTS have revealed how they discovered more than they bargained for when a York excavation unearthed the remains of a “forgotten” army’s soldiers.

The site at the junction of Kent Street and Fawcett Street, on which a medieval church was once housed, was the final resting place of 113 members of Oliver Cromwell’s Parliamentary force who fought during the gruelling Civil War siege of the city more than 350 years ago.

And the team which found the ten mass graves where the 11th century church of All Saints’ in Fishergate used to stand have now told the story of how they discovered the warriors, stripped of all their clothing and possessions.

In a report by archaeological experts Lauren McIntyre and Graham Bruce in the latest edition of Current Archaeology magazine, they revealed the 2007 dig concluded the soldiers were not killed fighting, but probably by disease, and that they never expected to make such a find.

The excavation found the skeletons tightly packed and neatly arranged in parallel rows, with most laid face-down in the dirt or on their side, but no buckles, buttons or jewellery were discovered.

In total, the graves contained 113 sets of remains, with at least 87 of them being male and most being aged between 35 and 49.

“The skeletons are likely to represent a military group who all died within a short period,” said the authors of the article.

“It is highly unlikely these men were killed in combat or as a result of violence. Considering the length of the siege and the number of men involved, it is very likely this group of people were killed by highly infectious disease.

“These mass graves are likely to contain the remains of Oliver Cromwell’s victorious army, responsible for the Royalists’ defeat at the Battle of Marston Moor and the shifting of control in the north of England.”

The report said the excavation was “valuable and fascinating” and “continues to generate interest”. The skeletons are being kept for analysis at the University of Sheffield’s archaeology department.

Comments(6)

Caecilius says...
5:39pm Thu 19 Aug 10

Except that Oliver Cromwell didn't command any of the three armies that were besieging York and that fought the Royalists on Marston Moor. He commanded the cavalry of the Eastern Association's army, which was led by the Earl of Manchester. They weren't positioned in the Fishergate area, either: they were on the north side of the city. The soldiers facing this part of the city walls were from the Yorkshire army commanded by Lord Fairfax and his son, Sir Thomas. So, if these are Civil War burials (and that seems to be based entirely on guesswork, as no artefacts were found and no mention is made of any other evidence that might help to date them), it's unlikely they were ever under Cromwell's command.

Expat Bob says...
12:29am Fri 20 Aug 10

A fascinating time in and around the City of York. Its nice to know there are people who know so much and find it as interesting as I do. Many years ago I read a book called, “The Long and Great Siege of York” written by a guy named Shakespeare. (Not William) I can’t remember anything about the writer now but it was certainly an excellent read. Now this article has reminded me I will look the book up again. York has so much History you can still see the signs of but so many don’t know what they are.
Hope this thread continues it will be good to get more information.

Saracen says...
8:09am Fri 20 Aug 10

i totally agree with caecillus. Bearing in mind the limitations of a press report, there does seem a tendency for modern archaelogists to put 2 and 2 together and make 5.
Diseased persons were often buried outside the walls and without any evidence could simply be one of the common infections which were commonplace in medieval communities.
They of course could equally be Royalist or just ordinary townsfolk who suffered severe privations during the siege. Jumping to attractive and heafline grabbing conclusions tends to be a sign of the times sadly.

T. Scaife says...
11:15am Fri 20 Aug 10

Caecilius wrote:
Except that Oliver Cromwell didn't command any of the three armies that were besieging York and that fought the Royalists on Marston Moor. He commanded the cavalry of the Eastern Association's army, which was led by the Earl of Manchester. They weren't positioned in the Fishergate area, either: they were on the north side of the city. The soldiers facing this part of the city walls were from the Yorkshire army commanded by Lord Fairfax and his son, Sir Thomas. So, if these are Civil War burials (and that seems to be based entirely on guesswork, as no artefacts were found and no mention is made of any other evidence that might help to date them), it's unlikely they were ever under Cromwell's command.
The report does not say Cromwell himself besieged York.

Cromwell later got rid of the ineffective military leaders including Manchester who had been a childhood friend of King Charles.

The New Model Army was formed and crushed the Royalists at the Battle of Naseby in 1645.

The reason the bodies are likely to be Cromwells Ironsides is that during the siege the Parliamentarians sufferred true hardship and disease while the Royalist army within Yorks defences did not. Also the age of the bodies was between 35 and 49 with no elderly or children which kind of rules out the Royalists and six women were buried too who could have been wives, chefs or prostitutes in the Roundhead army.

York only surrendered two weeks after the Ironsides defeated Prince Rupert at the Battle of Marston Moor, where Cromwells cavalry played a decisive part - incidentally it was Prince Rupert who coined the phrase Cromwells ironsides after his defeat at Marston Moor.

The commander of the Royalist army in York, the Marquis of Newcastle, abandoned King Charles and ran away in disgrace to the Netherlands with his tail between his legs after the surrender of York on the 16th of July 1644.

sheps lad says...
8:27pm Fri 20 Aug 10

Amazing what you can find out on Google!!

T. Scaife says...
12:40pm Sat 21 Aug 10

sheps lad wrote:
Amazing what you can find out on Google!!
Not everyone is obviously as well informed as your good self.

The fountain of knowledge is like a bottomless well in that it is never-ending.

Grains of learning are passed on in so many differing formats. Most people acquire knowledge from snippets of TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, gossip, teachers and now the greatest fountain of available knowledge - the Internet which opens up access to 'superior' minds and thousands of years of information hitherto unavailable to the masses.

It does not matter from where it comes, the important thing is that knowledge is freely available and spread around.

So don't knock it - you should try it sometime.


Forgotten men from Oliver Cromwell’s besieging forces, found in a mass grave in York. Picture courtesy of On-Site Archaeology Forgotten men from Oliver Cromwell’s besieging forces, found in a mass grave in York. Picture courtesy of On-Site Archaeology

Forgotten men from Oliver Cromwell’s besieging forces, found in a mass grave in York. Picture courtesy of On-Site Archaeology

Forgotten men from Oliver Cromwell’s besieging forces, found in a mass grave in York. Picture courtesy of On-Site Archaeology



Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses