GORDON Campbell Thomas complains that City of York Council has failed to consider the ecological impact of developments such as Coppergate II and argues that this council's support for the development is against residents' interests and their quality of life (September 30).

However, as we demonstrated in the independent public inquiry, nothing could be further from the truth. In November 2000 the planning committee felt it was right in planning terms and the council believes it is right for the city centre economy and the long-term prosperity of York and its residents.

The council is committed to sustainable development - that is to balance the need for investment, jobs and services against the need to minimise the impact on the environment of developments which meet these needs.

In the years of debate over the Coppergate extension we tried to ensure these concerns would be met by the developers which is why, if the scheme is approved by the Government, it will include significant investment in green transport facilities such as cycling, walking and public transport as well as incorporating affordable housing and leisure facilities.

It also provides an extension of the grassed area and an improved setting for Clifford's Tower.

Furthermore, the council also has to consider the economic threat to York of "out of town" developments. These attract more than 90 per cent of visits by car, compared to half that in town centres.

Our ideas for the local plan will require large developments to incorporate public green space and, far from helping them to "pursue a quick buck", we are working with developers to ensure that York develops sustainably and that as many citizens as possible can share in that investment.

Roy Templeman,

Director,

Environment and development services, City of York Council,

St Leonard's Place, York.

Updated: 11:03 Monday, October 07, 2002