It has been very interesting following the debate and discussions around the proposed traffic management scheme at Blossom Street, and as we have reached the end of the public consultation period it is worth reflecting on Coun Galloway’s reassurance to York’s taxi drivers that the majority of respondents are opting for a scheme that would not involve the loss of a car lane (Cabbies highlight fury over traffic lane plan, The Press, March 24).

It is unfortunate that Coun Galloway chose to release details of the consultation before the closing date, but it does allow us to put some statistics into context. The majority of peak-time morning and afternoon traffic down and up Blossom Street is car (3,613) and bus (171 full buses), with bicycles at 493. If the ratio of these were to be translated into consultation responses then the majority would naturally be in favour of the least disruptive option.

To take the long view, the council is quite right to attempt to significantly improve facilities for pedestrians and cyclists. Car growth is not an option any more.

Unfortunately for councillors, some very tough decisions will have to be made that will not be popular.

Blossom Street has been identified as a “gateway street opportunity area” in the draft city centre area action plan, and it lies within York’s central area conservation area. Improvements to the road system will need to understand this, as well as effectively improving the lot of cyclists and pedestrians, if York is to meet all its ambitions and create exciting shared spaces for us all to use and enjoy.

Bob Sydes, historic environment consultant, Sydes Heritage Services, Ainsty Avenue, York.