MP Nigel Adams wades into flooding debate

York Press: Nigel Adams Nigel Adams

A NORTH Yorkshire MP has said victims of flooding deserve help rather than higher insurance premiums.

Visiting residents of Tadcaster and Kirkby Wharf, who suffered flooding in 2012, Nigel Adams, MP for Selby and Ainsty, urged the Government to take action.

Nigel Adams MP for Selby and Ainsty said: “It is bad enough to be flooded, people who are victims of flooding should be helped rather than be faced with increased premiums or no insurance at all.

“While we have been very lucky locally this year because we have not suffered any major flooding it is important to make sure that we are protected for the future. Flood prevention is complex and expensive because the water has to go somewhere. Action has to be taken all year round to ensure that rivers are kept clear and flood banks are maintained in good order.”

Mr Adams said a number of his constituents who were flooded in 2012 have found their insurance premiums have increased or their insurers have said they will no longer offer cover, and said a number of schemes could help protect properties.

He said: “I would encourage any community that has suffered from flooding in the past to set up a Flood Group and to engage with the Environment Agency and with North Yorkshire County Council to get problems addressed and prevention measures in place. Prevention is better than cure.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:10am Mon 24 Feb 14

myselby says...

Perhaps Mr Adams would like to lobby for the flood defences in Selby Barlby to be completed- Selby and Barlby are still at risk .
Perhaps Mr Adams would like to lobby for the flood defences in Selby Barlby to be completed- Selby and Barlby are still at risk . myselby
  • Score: 4

11:13am Mon 24 Feb 14

aa42john says...

I do not see why high-risk people should have their insurance subsidised. They are generally property-owners with considerable wealth.

If there is a subsidy, it should go to the poor, not the rich.

(Apparently one reason for the recent floods is that the Tories have removed the requirement that maize farmers restrict rapid runoff from their fields. Yet these farmer still get an EU subsidy!)
I do not see why high-risk people should have their insurance subsidised. They are generally property-owners with considerable wealth. If there is a subsidy, it should go to the poor, not the rich. (Apparently one reason for the recent floods is that the Tories have removed the requirement that maize farmers restrict rapid runoff from their fields. Yet these farmer still get an EU subsidy!) aa42john
  • Score: 3

12:33pm Mon 24 Feb 14

myselby says...

I fear that the flooding insurance subsidy is rather like Bankers bonuses, the rich get them and the poor pay for them. If you choose to live in a riverside property then you should expect to get your feet wet occasionally. I have friends who live by the river in York and accept that the cellar and ground floor is at risk but are happy to put up with this for the benefits of riverside living.
I fear that the flooding insurance subsidy is rather like Bankers bonuses, the rich get them and the poor pay for them. If you choose to live in a riverside property then you should expect to get your feet wet occasionally. I have friends who live by the river in York and accept that the cellar and ground floor is at risk but are happy to put up with this for the benefits of riverside living. myselby
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree