Project to research and celebrate King Richard III

A portrait of Richard III A portrait of Richard III

A PROJECT to “research, celebrate and commemorate” Richard III in York has begun as the debate over where his remains should be buried rumbles on.

The monarch’s 500-year-old skeleton was identified earlier this month after it was uncovered during an archaeological dig at a council car park in Leicester last year.

Campaigners have been calling for his remains to be reburied in York, as he had wished, instead of in Leicester Cathedral, as currently planned.

Now City of York Council, York Minster, the University of York, York Museums Trust, the Richard III Society and the king’s descendants have attended a meeting to discuss how to build on the “extraordinary levels of public interest”.

It was decided a project should be organised to research and celebrate the Yorkist king.

A council spokesman said it would research and develop public awareness of the life and times of Richard’s reign, as well as celebrating the man and monarch in a manner similar to the York 800 programme of community involvement.

Kersten England, the city council’s chief executive, said: “Systematically working through the wealth of myths and hard evidence surrounding Richard will give us a firm knowledge base on which to build a programme of public involvement and celebration – with which we hope to include the people of Leicester – to keep alive the life and times of this remarkable man and monarch.”

Among the research sources available to academics will be House Books from the city’s archives and finds like the Middleham Jewel displayed at the Yorkshire Museum.

Buildings which may be used to illustrate the life and times of late 15th-century England could include Monk Bar – now a museum dedicated to Richard III – the Guildhall, where the last Plantagenet king dined, Barley Hall and York Minster.

A spokesperson for the Richard III Society said: “The society fully supports this venture which builds on its long promotion of the special relationship between the city and the king.”

Vanessa Roe, 16th great-niece of Richard III, said: “We wish to keep the impact and memory of the king alive.

“Adding to the existing body of research and celebrating his life is something I hope many, many people across the world will join us in, will enjoy and will continue to do so for generations to come.”

Comments(10)

metoo says...
9:12am Thu 7 Mar 13

who is paying the cost

CHISSY1 says...
9:25am Thu 7 Mar 13

"Here we go again".

Garrowby Turnoff says...
9:28am Thu 7 Mar 13

Wonder what will happen if we discover we're fussing about having the remains of someone similar to Fred West buried in York Minster?

Zetkin says...
9:50am Thu 7 Mar 13

Garrowby Turnoff wrote:
Wonder what will happen if we discover we're fussing about having the remains of someone similar to Fred West buried in York Minster?
Richard III was certainly no angel, but then again no monarch ever has been.

Every royal family that's murdered, fought, cheated, raped, and thieved its way to the throne has enough skeletons rattling in its closet to provide the foundations for every car park in the country.

somedetailsaremissingorincorrect says...
9:51am Thu 7 Mar 13

This is fair enough: there is no harm in pursuing proper historical research, as opposed to the baseless assertions and emotive romanticized nonsense that has driven the 'bring Richard to York' crowd. The involvement of the University of York and York Museums Trust gives some assurance that things will be properly done. This project also gives the campaigners the chance to ensure that when they lose their ridiculous fight they can lose gracefully and York can salvage something from the whole embarrassing farrago.

(Note to York Press: please stop calling them 'the king's descendants', they are nothing of the kind. Richard had no children and thus has no descendants.)

somedetailsaremissingorincorrect says...
10:03am Thu 7 Mar 13


MikeForbes says...
10:24am Thu 7 Mar 13

Direct descendants of the siblings of an individual are known in law as that individual's 'collateral descendants'. So, a great nephew/niece is actually a descendant. This classification can be used to describe all those who have recently been quoted in the press (including the above).

Stroppiness says...
10:41am Thu 7 Mar 13

Here we go again - I agree with the first comments in repeect of cost etc - if the powers that be want to do this, fair enough. However, not one penny of local tax payers money should go into this at a time when front line services for the elderly and vulnerable are being cut.

We have more chance of being on the next mission to Mars than we do of prising the remains away from Leicester, due to the great greedy corporate gravy train. Leicester funded the search and Leicester found the body, in Leicester. York Minster don't want the body. That must be an end to the saga over the remains.

I have no problem with private funds being used to fund research into Richard's life etc. However, If A & E try to hijack this and use local tax payers money to embark on a doomed campaign to bring the body to York then they need locking in a box and burying in the hole they dug Richard out of!

Prob says...
12:42pm Thu 7 Mar 13

"The monarch’s 500-year-old skeleton was identified earlier this month"

No it wasn't! Stop re-using old articles lazily.

Woody G Mellor says...
3:17pm Thu 7 Mar 13

I hope the entire project is paid for using "local tax payers money".

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree