ENVIRONMENT Agency bosses cling to their claim they “saved” 1,000 properties by opening the flood barrier.
Their argument is that with the barrier in place and no pumps operating, there would effectively have been a dam across the Foss causing a huge back-up of Foss water.
But those 600 who were sacrificed are not convinced this action was warranted or unavoidable.
Isn’t it the responsibility of flood control managers to have contingency plans in place to quickly obtain back-up pumps if urgently needed? And is it also not incumbent upon them to periodically test and practice a manual lifting of the flood gate in the event of power failure?
All of these prudent actions were seemingly ignored in the ever-changing excuses and statements put out by the EA.
Many people are convinced this was not a failure of the installation itself but a failure of people paid to ensure it works correctly at the most critical times.
Matthew Laverack, Lord Mayors Walk, York
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel