- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@yorkpress
Follow us on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
The Press, York
Like us on Facebook
Tories would turn York miserable (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Tories would turn York miserable
8:20am Thursday 6th December 2012 in Letters By Reader's letter
COUN PAUL DOUGHTY’S letter of December 5 shows yet again why the Conservatives can’t be trusted to run the city.
Like their friends in government, they simply do not understand the nature of public investment. The return on arts spending, according to the Government’s own figures, is around £4 for every £1 of public money spent.
A floating arts centre would attract more people (including local residents) to the river, a part of the city that is often neglected, and they will spend money in shops, cafés and hotels as a result.
Where private funding needs topping up to make a project happen, that’s a sensible use of money. If the Tories had their way, we would cut everything, making York a dull and miserable place for locals and visitors alike.
You have only to look at the state of the economy, after two and half a years of Tory inspired cuts, to see the results of this Gradgrind approach.
Patrick Kelly, East Mount Road, York.
Comments(10)
Silver
says...
8:16pm Thu 6 Dec 12
Buzz Light-year wrote:Well to George Orwell's 1984....so we will have to learn newspeak to speak of JA
Indeed. Arts and culture are important factors in the general feeling of well-being in a country.
We already have so many generic mainstream bars (our old Arts Centre is now one of them) we need something that gives back.
Interestingly the author here refers to a letter we weren't allowed to comment on. A quick read of this website shows comments are now being disallowed on any story or letter involving the council leader James Alexander or his policies.
I'm a little disappointed that The Press is ceding to demands to shut down debate, questions and valid counterpoint.
I remember when Mr Alexander used to be an accessible, open councillor, he used to post on here, comprehensively and helpfully, to answer criticisms and questions.
Now it seems no comment at all is allowed.
Where have we seen that before in history?
capt spaulding
says...
8:20pm Thu 6 Dec 12
The writing is on the wall as far as Buzz and Capt Spaulding are concerned we are going to be banned from these colums very shortly for the very reasons you have outlined.
I dont think we will be marched off to some secret place yet but our man seems to be heading that way.
Buzz Light-year
says...
9:15pm Thu 6 Dec 12
Scarlet Pimpernel
says...
10:11pm Thu 6 Dec 12
Buzz Light-year wrote:Alexander has become a law unto himself, and actions like this will be his undoing...... !!!
Indeed. Arts and culture are important factors in the general feeling of well-being in a country.
We already have so many generic mainstream bars (our old Arts Centre is now one of them) we need something that gives back.
Interestingly the author here refers to a letter we weren't allowed to comment on. A quick read of this website shows comments are now being disallowed on any story or letter involving the council leader James Alexander or his policies.
I'm a little disappointed that The Press is ceding to demands to shut down debate, questions and valid counterpoint.
I remember when Mr Alexander used to be an accessible, open councillor, he used to post on here, comprehensively and helpfully, to answer criticisms and questions.
Now it seems no comment at all is allowed.
Where have we seen that before in history?
Magicman!
says...
3:15am Fri 7 Dec 12
".... bus lane" ... "in" .... "middle of"..... "nowhere"....
Oaklands Resident
says...
8:14am Fri 7 Dec 12
If you want to fund projects like this yourselves or via voluntary appeals then fine. Go ahead.
However, if you want taxpayers money, then traditionally there have been some hoops that you have to jump through to earn the right to take money out of my pocket.
First you have to demonstrate that there is a need for additional arts space in the City. Such an analysis needs to be publicly available. You haven’t done this.
Secondly, if you can establish the need, you must demonstrate that public funding is needed to take the project forward. You haven’t done this.
Thirdly you must publish the reasons why an old floating barge is a preferable location to the re-use of one of York’s empty buildings. You haven’t done this.
Finally, you must then convince us that not only can the funding be raised to buy and modify the barge, but also that you have a robust business plan, covering at least 5 years, that will address maintenance and day to day expenditure. You haven’t done this.
All this information needs to be published before you try to convince us that establishing a few part time bar person jobs is worth sacrificing the livelihoods of dozens of real public service workers, who face the dole under Alexander’s borrow and spend policies.
Bring back annual Council elections!
capt spaulding
says...
9:29am Fri 7 Dec 12
Oaklands Resident wrote:Annual council elections would prevent the damage being inflicted on us by the present council and its egotistical leader.
Time for arts barge apologists to get the message.
If you want to fund projects like this yourselves or via voluntary appeals then fine. Go ahead.
However, if you want taxpayers money, then traditionally there have been some hoops that you have to jump through to earn the right to take money out of my pocket.
First you have to demonstrate that there is a need for additional arts space in the City. Such an analysis needs to be publicly available. You haven’t done this.
Secondly, if you can establish the need, you must demonstrate that public funding is needed to take the project forward. You haven’t done this.
Thirdly you must publish the reasons why an old floating barge is a preferable location to the re-use of one of York’s empty buildings. You haven’t done this.
Finally, you must then convince us that not only can the funding be raised to buy and modify the barge, but also that you have a robust business plan, covering at least 5 years, that will address maintenance and day to day expenditure. You haven’t done this.
All this information needs to be published before you try to convince us that establishing a few part time bar person jobs is worth sacrificing the livelihoods of dozens of real public service workers, who face the dole under Alexander’s borrow and spend policies.
Bring back annual Council elections!
Definately the way forward.
Sillybillies
says...
3:23pm Fri 7 Dec 12
Bring back annual Council elections!
You can't bring back what we've never had, and as for the council, we've had Labour in the past and what a corrupt mess they were. Then the LibDems were tried and what a disappointment Galloway, Waller & Co were. Now it's the New Labour liars, isn't Calamity "I've no plans to visit the Philippines" James wonderful?
I'd be very happy to let the Conservatives have a go, it would be difficult for them to be worse than the other two.
Oaklands Resident
says...
4:54pm Fri 7 Dec 12
Having a proportion of the Council re-elected each year wouldn't guarantee that any particular party was successful, but it would give electors a chance to give a regular verdict on current performance.
Buzz Light-year says...
1:15pm Thu 6 Dec 12
We already have so many generic mainstream bars (our old Arts Centre is now one of them) we need something that gives back.
Interestingly the author here refers to a letter we weren't allowed to comment on. A quick read of this website shows comments are now being disallowed on any story or letter involving the council leader James Alexander or his policies.
I'm a little disappointed that The Press is ceding to demands to shut down debate, questions and valid counterpoint.
I remember when Mr Alexander used to be an accessible, open councillor, he used to post on here, comprehensively and helpfully, to answer criticisms and questions.
Now it seems no comment at all is allowed.
Where have we seen that before in history?