The Fylingdales controversy referred to in The Press on 17th January 17 (Decision-makers do not deserve our trust, Soapbox) needs some clarification.

Fylingdales is primarily an RAF early warning station, staffed by the RAF. It also works closely with the US early warning missile system, which has three other stations in North America, which requires some American forces representation.

Menwith Hill RAF Base is an integral part of NATO's missile defence system. There are eight other similar stations situated throughout the world.

There are 26 other European countries who are members of NATO. The US provides the main technology for the listening devices, and naturally needs American company representatives who supply and maintain the devices which also have American forces operators.

It is true the Government announced changes to the functions of these places in a manner which avoided debate. Since this country is under an obligation to and as part of NATO, a debate would have probably not changed the decision.

Without the support of the American forces and finances, NATO and its connected organisations would not be effective.

The accusation about misleading recruitment drives, is just not true as demonstrated in previous letters.

The last two paragraphs of the letter are extremely desirable aspirations. Up to now experience of such practices have produced very few lasting results.

J Beisly, Osprey Close, York.