ON February 10 this year the York Press reported that Lee Robert Waring, 41, was unable to attend a court hearing at which a judge made a serious crime prevention order (SCPO) against a co-defendant. Waring, who was self-isolating in prison, was likely to face a similar order, the court heard.
We reported that Waring was serving six years and eight months for conspiracy to supply cocaine and a further offence. We were mistaken in reporting that the further offence was possessing indecent images of children, whereas in fact it was possessing extreme pornography not involving children. We are glad to put the record straight.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article