York City sign Michael Rankine on loan (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
York City sign Michael Rankine on loan
10:22am Tuesday 12th February 2013 in Sport
STRIKER Michael Rankine today rejoined York City on loan from Aldershot.
The Doncaster-born forward, 28, is back at Bootham Crescent until the end of the npower League Two campaign.
Comments(86)
PhilTopping
says...
10:28am Tue 12 Feb 13
And let nobody tell me "don't judge a player until he plays for City". I've seen this fella play 40+ times, I know his game back to front, and he's a very very poor choice.
tips
says...
10:33am Tue 12 Feb 13
Welcome back Michael prove the knockers wrong and help keep this great club of ours where it belongs ....in the Football League.
paintitred
says...
10:37am Tue 12 Feb 13
who do you think we should sign.
that
A . Is affordable
B is Available
D is what we are looking for
some fans moan for the sake of it.
and in the real world with wage cap Rankine is more than likely all we can afford.
give the guy a chance . Can he do any worse that whats been on show in front of goal this season. i very much doubt it.
It too you just 6 minutes to stick the boot in. Some fan eh!
old_school_minsterman
says...
10:40am Tue 12 Feb 13
When he came on against York at BC a few weeks ago he won more headers in 15 minutes than any of York's front 6 did all game. Hopefully will add a plan B to our game!
Welcome back Ranks!
Fat Harry
says...
10:42am Tue 12 Feb 13
Might Rankine's signing indicate that Mills is willing to try a different formation?
Welcome back Ranks, hope it works out - for all our sakes!
YCFC115
says...
10:43am Tue 12 Feb 13
YCFC am byth
says...
10:46am Tue 12 Feb 13
Welcome back Michael!
We need to remember we are not owned by rich arabs and that Millsy is working under tight constraints that will always mean that some signings are a gamble and may not work out. Rankine will add some much needed beef and is very welcome!
York Manor
says...
10:48am Tue 12 Feb 13
Tug job
says...
10:49am Tue 12 Feb 13
PhilTopping wrote:Ha, ha, ha - typical! At least if we do go down you'll be able to say "told you so". Who do you realistically expect to sign? Come on, be proactive, rather than just moaning, name some names of strikers we can afford and who would want to come.
I'm sorry I can't support this transfer. He was nowhere near good enough for us last time, he's actually got worse since then. The thought of Rankine in a 433 makes me shudder. And let nobody tell me "don't judge a player until he plays for City". I've seen this fella play 40+ times, I know his game back to front, and he's a very very poor choice.
redbluelion
says...
10:56am Tue 12 Feb 13
OLD - HEAD
says...
11:10am Tue 12 Feb 13
jaycee
says...
11:13am Tue 12 Feb 13
RooBeck
says...
11:14am Tue 12 Feb 13
rogue84
says...
11:21am Tue 12 Feb 13
lets live in the real world. we've been saying for 6 months that we could do with a target man, and despite Ranks not being the best footballer on the planet, he is strong, physical, aggressive and he enjoyed playing for City in the time he was here. sometimes returning to a club can give you an extra 10-20% in effort (chris smith an ideal example from last season).
i'd throw him straight in for tonights game and give the Gills defence a real battle. get Walker and Blair down each side and it could prove effective. it's not like we've got any other option at the minute is it!?
ADAMCUTHBERT
says...
11:31am Tue 12 Feb 13
But if nothing else he frightens the life out of defenders when running in on goal! I wouldn't want to mark him!
old_school_minsterman
says...
11:31am Tue 12 Feb 13
rogue84 wrote:Spot on with this comment. It has been too easy for too long playing against York's frontline so now there is pace along with strength to contend with.
i'd love to know which players people think we should be signing? perhaps we should rock up to Port Vale with a £1mil bid for Tom Pope? oh but wait...we have no money and we can only make loan signings due to the transfer window being shut. lets live in the real world. we've been saying for 6 months that we could do with a target man, and despite Ranks not being the best footballer on the planet, he is strong, physical, aggressive and he enjoyed playing for City in the time he was here. sometimes returning to a club can give you an extra 10-20% in effort (chris smith an ideal example from last season). i'd throw him straight in for tonights game and give the Gills defence a real battle. get Walker and Blair down each side and it could prove effective. it's not like we've got any other option at the minute is it!?
Now Walker has a proper target man to play alongside what him start to score more goals from open play.
Maltkiln
says...
11:33am Tue 12 Feb 13
roobarb85
says...
11:33am Tue 12 Feb 13
1. Cliche but true - never go back to your old club: Smith and Bullock great examples of this.
2. MR wasn't great at scoring for us in the Conference - why would he be better now than then?
3. We've now got as a potential strike force two players who can't make the first team at Aldershot, who, last time I looked were one of the lowest-scoring teams in the league.
4. I don't understand all this 'we're skint' stuff. You mean worse off than Accrington/Morecambe
/Barnet/Rochdale to name but 4 who have much lower gates and have had no Wembley/Cup runs in the last few years ?
5. You might say 'If not MR then who.? Well I don't have a list of squad members off hand, but really, there's noone at Leeds/Bradford/Scunn
y/Donny/Hull etc that need a bit of first team game time?
Yes I really hope it all works out and yes get there and cheer 'em on...but really I'm baffled.
cityforthepremier
says...
11:37am Tue 12 Feb 13
He may not get lots of goals but get us more oportunities to score, if there's a centre forward out there that can score lots of goals out there he will be playing for big money at a higher level. This is a good signing within our budget. He will work his socks off to get a deal beyond this season you can guarantee that & that the type of player we need. Can't wait to hear "we all love Rankine!" Again, welcome & all the best Ranks!
class of 84
says...
11:49am Tue 12 Feb 13
Tug job
says...
11:51am Tue 12 Feb 13
roobarb85 wrote:Sigh:
This isn't being negative - it's being realistic. I hope it all works out - but I just can't see the logic in it.Yes a big unit up front - just this big unit ???? 1. Cliche but true - never go back to your old club: Smith and Bullock great examples of this. 2. MR wasn't great at scoring for us in the Conference - why would he be better now than then? 3. We've now got as a potential strike force two players who can't make the first team at Aldershot, who, last time I looked were one of the lowest-scoring teams in the league. 4. I don't understand all this 'we're skint' stuff. You mean worse off than Accrington/Morecambe /Barnet/Rochdale to name but 4 who have much lower gates and have had no Wembley/Cup runs in the last few years ? 5. You might say 'If not MR then who.? Well I don't have a list of squad members off hand, but really, there's noone at Leeds/Bradford/Scunn y/Donny/Hull etc that need a bit of first team game time? Yes I really hope it all works out and yes get there and cheer 'em on...but really I'm baffled.
1. There are plenty of examples of this working the other way, too, and players having great second spells with a club.
2. He has presence in the box, can win and hold the ball up to create for others -Walker has been asked to do this and has tried his best but he doesn't have the same physique
3. Potentially, yes, but unlikely to start together
4. Football finances haven't been solely dependent upon gates for at least a decade
5. It isn't only about who is available, it is also about who wants to come - players are not slaves, they have choice.
Sadly, will miss the match tonight as I'm working down in Cardiff but I shall be keeping my eye on the result. Here's hoping they win and, if they don't win, at least play well. COYR
Colin Pratt
says...
11:54am Tue 12 Feb 13
Southern Exile
says...
11:59am Tue 12 Feb 13
Tug job
says...
12:18pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Colin Pratt wrote:
Finally something different up front. A big problem for defenders which will hopefully free up Walker to do what he can do best. That Said, If Mills starts with the same personell as Wycome he needs his head looking at. Rankine and Walker have to start in a 4-4-2 tonight. But that just wont happen will it? Oh dear another night of misery in store no doubt. If the club did refunds on season tickets I'd happily bite their hand off, FACT.
rogue84
says...
12:24pm Tue 12 Feb 13
1. Smith is an example of how it DID work, he was excellent last season in the final few months.
2. Ranks scored a goal every 4 games for us, not the best, but certainly not awful...and the key thing during his spell was that both Brodie and Reed (albeit just for 4 months) were prolific when playing alongside him....we must hope Walker will be as well.
3. Using Aldershot's record doesn't really mean too much as all teams play differently in terms of formation and creativity etc.
4. Accrington are a good example, but they have been a settled league side for many years, they have adapted to the rigours of the division. however, they are below us in the league, as are Barnet. Rochdale were in L1 last season i believe so had bigger gate-receipts coming in. Remember we basically didn't make any money from the trips to Wembley, see the financial figures.
5. If we went to a local club and brought in a striker with no first team/league experience, people wouldn't be happy with that either.
p.s enjoying the fact that you've raised your opinions in this way, unlike some others who just charge in with the 'mills out' banner.
iandwightbenton
says...
12:34pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Walker needs this kind of help and Rankine is perfect and hard working.
Makes our lightweights look a little tougher too.
Watch out subway !!
YorkCityLuke
says...
12:36pm Tue 12 Feb 13
The_Baron89
says...
12:36pm Tue 12 Feb 13
rogue84 wrote:Pretty sure he means Jonathan Smith to be fair
roobarb85 i can see the reason for asking those questions, but in response... 1. Smith is an example of how it DID work, he was excellent last season in the final few months. 2. Ranks scored a goal every 4 games for us, not the best, but certainly not awful...and the key thing during his spell was that both Brodie and Reed (albeit just for 4 months) were prolific when playing alongside him....we must hope Walker will be as well. 3. Using Aldershot's record doesn't really mean too much as all teams play differently in terms of formation and creativity etc. 4. Accrington are a good example, but they have been a settled league side for many years, they have adapted to the rigours of the division. however, they are below us in the league, as are Barnet. Rochdale were in L1 last season i believe so had bigger gate-receipts coming in. Remember we basically didn't make any money from the trips to Wembley, see the financial figures. 5. If we went to a local club and brought in a striker with no first team/league experience, people wouldn't be happy with that either. p.s enjoying the fact that you've raised your opinions in this way, unlike some others who just charge in with the 'mills out' banner.
alimount
says...
12:37pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Finally, Gary is admitting he was wrong. This could be the catalyst for him to try a Plan B.
He didn't want Ranks, now he does. The worm has changed, get behind the team tonight.
Dortmun
says...
12:39pm Tue 12 Feb 13
On the down side he does not score a lot of goals, but if he has been brought back to play as I would hope in a 442 system as the main striker with walker playing off him I am sure he will create chances for Walker, Blair, Chambers etc. So all in all things look positive. IF WE PLAY 442.
rogue84
says...
12:40pm Tue 12 Feb 13
jimmy120883
says...
12:42pm Tue 12 Feb 13
If you look at when Brodie and Rankine played together i don't think Brodie would have got half the goals he did if it wasn't for Ranks with the flick ons and dragging defenders to create space for brodie so hopefully he's coming back to prove a point to the fans and Mills and we get the good side out of him for the remainder of the season.
PhilR@Strike
says...
12:56pm Tue 12 Feb 13
1968expat
says...
1:04pm Tue 12 Feb 13
roobarb85 wrote:Answer to your number 1 quote
This isn't being negative - it's being realistic. I hope it all works out - but I just can't see the logic in it.Yes a big unit up front - just this big unit ????
1. Cliche but true - never go back to your old club: Smith and Bullock great examples of this.
2. MR wasn't great at scoring for us in the Conference - why would he be better now than then?
3. We've now got as a potential strike force two players who can't make the first team at Aldershot, who, last time I looked were one of the lowest-scoring teams in the league.
4. I don't understand all this 'we're skint' stuff. You mean worse off than Accrington/Morecambe
/Barnet/Rochdale to name but 4 who have much lower gates and have had no Wembley/Cup runs in the last few years ?
5. You might say 'If not MR then who.? Well I don't have a list of squad members off hand, but really, there's noone at Leeds/Bradford/Scunn
y/Donny/Hull etc that need a bit of first team game time?
Yes I really hope it all works out and yes get there and cheer 'em on...but really I'm baffled.
PAUL AIMSON!!!!!!!!!
Phil, Leeds
says...
1:07pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Edsoni
says...
1:24pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Dortmun wrote:Agree with most of this except point 4.
Considering we have no money to spend on the tall strong premier league striker that a lot of people think we should get Rankine would appear a excellent choice. 1. He is tall. 2. He is strong. 3. He wins headers. 4. He can hold the ball. 5 He will keep defenders busy leaving space for others. 6 He knows the club well so should have no problems settling in.
On the down side he does not score a lot of goals, but if he has been brought back to play as I would hope in a 442 system as the main striker with walker playing off him I am sure he will create chances for Walker, Blair, Chambers etc. So all in all things look positive. IF WE PLAY 442.
Rankine is a kind of lower league Heskey - he doesn't score that many goals, he doesn't link play, but on his day he gives defenders so many problems that others should be able to benefit. Defensively at set pieces he is usually a benefit also.
The question is how many times will our games coincide with him on his day?
For me the big problem this quarter has been the isolation of the man at the front. We need our central attackers to be closer together whether they're coming from midfield (a la Lampard) or in the hole behind the point of the diamond. With Rankine, his relative lack of mobility may actually be a benefit as Mills takes a pragmatic approach to the run in. It looks like the spine of the team has been strengthened this week. And the squad has a much more experienced look about it.
The yellowbacks,doom mongers and those with personal agendas will no doubt be queuing to share their bile with us if it doesn't click straight away but we certainly cannot accuse the club of sitting on their hands.
IntelXXX
says...
1:34pm Tue 12 Feb 13
We don't have any control over who Mills brings in or what formation he plays. All I can say is he knows far more about managing a professional football team than we do.
I always said this season was going to be very very tough and I'm afraid we will be in a relegation dog fight there is no doubt about that.
oldmanvecrayke
says...
1:55pm Tue 12 Feb 13
openallhours
says...
2:05pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Phil, Leeds wrote:Totally agree and I think we've missed this type of player for quite a while. I've mentioned before that I'd happily have Rankine back so lets hope he shows us all what we've been missing.
Fantastic signing, exactly what we need and you know what you'll get from Ranks. Let's all give him a massive welcome back tonight.
big mobe
says...
2:19pm Tue 12 Feb 13
all I* can say is be carefull what you wish for!
joejamestom
says...
2:38pm Tue 12 Feb 13
GM has done something and got a bit of physical presence up front as we all thought was missing he just needs to adapt the tactics to suit the players he has just cannot be used as JW is.
Welcome back Ranks I hope you have a great end to the season with us. Cmon City!!!
pip007
says...
2:40pm Tue 12 Feb 13
YoRkIe59
says...
2:42pm Tue 12 Feb 13
tomwillo1
says...
2:43pm Tue 12 Feb 13
pip007
says...
2:46pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Southern Exile
says...
3:01pm Tue 12 Feb 13
pip007
says...
3:04pm Tue 12 Feb 13
The_Baron89
says...
3:10pm Tue 12 Feb 13
pip007 wrote:The window for loan deals has now opened. These players have been signed on loan until the end of the season.
I do have one question ... maybe someone can explain. How are we able to make signings after the transfer window has closed at the end of January?
pip007
says...
3:11pm Tue 12 Feb 13
The_Baron89 wrote:Thanks.
pip007 wrote:The window for loan deals has now opened. These players have been signed on loan until the end of the season.
I do have one question ... maybe someone can explain. How are we able to make signings after the transfer window has closed at the end of January?
Budgie
says...
3:33pm Tue 12 Feb 13
TerryYork
says...
4:09pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Badger43
says...
4:10pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Maltkiln
says...
4:12pm Tue 12 Feb 13
The_Baron89 wrote:Rankine is until the end of the season ... the Burton midfielder is just for a month !
pip007 wrote:The window for loan deals has now opened. These players have been signed on loan until the end of the season.
I do have one question ... maybe someone can explain. How are we able to make signings after the transfer window has closed at the end of January?
Maltkiln
says...
4:16pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Maltkiln wrote:I just checked this ... the Press state that McGrath is here until the end of the season, but minstermen.net states he is here on a one month loan ... which one is correct ?
The_Baron89 wrote:Rankine is until the end of the season ... the Burton midfielder is just for a month !
pip007 wrote:The window for loan deals has now opened. These players have been signed on loan until the end of the season.
I do have one question ... maybe someone can explain. How are we able to make signings after the transfer window has closed at the end of January?
arsene.about.york
says...
4:27pm Tue 12 Feb 13
tomwillo1 wrote:In that case, please explain to me why he can't get in the Aldershot team ? This is definitely a backward step, panic measure. We have re signed a player who, when he was here last time spent most of his time on his backside pleading with the ref for free kicks. Someone who, when offered a new contract at York turned it down and went off to sign for the mighty Aldershot and now when he can't get a game for them comes running back here. I can however see the logic in signing McGrath as he has a lot of experience and hopefully will add a bit of steel to our midfield. On tonight's match, if I were picking the team I would start with Rodman and McDaid in a 442 with Blair and Chambers given strict instructions to get forward and get some crosses in. However, now that Rankine is back you would assume he will play so he would take the place of McDaid.
IM DELIGHTED TO HAVE HIM BACK! JUST WHAT WE HAVE BEEN MISSING ALL SEASON, STRONG, GOOD IN THE AIR, CONSTANT THREAT, WORKS HARD AND MAKES DEFENDERS THINK. PEOPLE USED TO SLAG HIM OFF BUT I ALWAYS RATED HIM, TOP SIGNING! PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BEEN NEGATIVE!!! ROLL ON TONIGHT! COME ON CITY!!!
missionfromarry
says...
4:32pm Tue 12 Feb 13
haxbyreds
says...
4:40pm Tue 12 Feb 13
AB-
says...
4:48pm Tue 12 Feb 13
McGill will call an urgent Board meeting tomorrow and Mills and Co will be sacked on Thursday, Yipee
tips
says...
5:05pm Tue 12 Feb 13
AB-
says...
5:23pm Tue 12 Feb 13
bartsimmo
says...
5:28pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Southern Exile wrote:would have been better with Rankine and Reed through the middle!
How about 4-4-2 with Blair and Chambers out wide and Ranks and Walker through the middle...?
tips
says...
5:30pm Tue 12 Feb 13
bartsimmo
says...
5:31pm Tue 12 Feb 13
alimount wrote:It wasnt that Gary didnt want Ranks it was merely the fact we had a cash bid for him from a football league outfit and could not refuse the guy a chance in the league! I for one didnt want him to go first time round and certainly welcome him back now. Just a shame Reed is not in attendance as Walker must be due an injury, not that his presence would be missed anyway of late!
This signing can only be seen as a positive.
Finally, Gary is admitting he was wrong. This could be the catalyst for him to try a Plan B.
He didn't want Ranks, now he does. The worm has changed, get behind the team tonight.
duffy
says...
5:34pm Tue 12 Feb 13
bartsimmo
says...
5:35pm Tue 12 Feb 13
pip007 wrote:Quinn and Philips maybe???
Rankine and McDaid up front. Our own version of Heskey and Owen, Toshak and Keegan, and dare I say Walwyn and Byrne (OK, maybe not). Give Walker a rest, he's not delivering the goods.
bartsimmo
says...
5:40pm Tue 12 Feb 13
arsene.about.york wrote:He cant get in the Aldershot team for the same reason Reed couldnt get in our team. The manager was blind or down right stupid.
tomwillo1 wrote:In that case, please explain to me why he can't get in the Aldershot team ? This is definitely a backward step, panic measure. We have re signed a player who, when he was here last time spent most of his time on his backside pleading with the ref for free kicks. Someone who, when offered a new contract at York turned it down and went off to sign for the mighty Aldershot and now when he can't get a game for them comes running back here. I can however see the logic in signing McGrath as he has a lot of experience and hopefully will add a bit of steel to our midfield. On tonight's match, if I were picking the team I would start with Rodman and McDaid in a 442 with Blair and Chambers given strict instructions to get forward and get some crosses in. However, now that Rankine is back you would assume he will play so he would take the place of McDaid.
IM DELIGHTED TO HAVE HIM BACK! JUST WHAT WE HAVE BEEN MISSING ALL SEASON, STRONG, GOOD IN THE AIR, CONSTANT THREAT, WORKS HARD AND MAKES DEFENDERS THINK. PEOPLE USED TO SLAG HIM OFF BUT I ALWAYS RATED HIM, TOP SIGNING! PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BEEN NEGATIVE!!! ROLL ON TONIGHT! COME ON CITY!!!
bartsimmo
says...
5:43pm Tue 12 Feb 13
duffy wrote:To be honest Duffs when we signed Rodman I said we should have signed Rankine instead, I believe I was right too. Now we just need a brute at the back and one in midfield to stop us being bullied.
Sadly just another sign of how badly this season has gone downhill. Rankine was not even an ever present for us in the conference and can't hit a barn door from five yards and has cant get a game for a team below us in the league.Yes he has a physical presence which we do need but as stated elsewhere Mills has signed one hell of a lot of players and we look no better. Rankin might make an early impression as he often does but its more and more just a case of hanging on now, its obvious any ambition has gone well and truly out the window.
duffy
says...
5:43pm Tue 12 Feb 13
bartsimmo wrote:And the reason he was not an ever present for us at none league level often coming off the bench, was that manager blind ?
arsene.about.york wrote:He cant get in the Aldershot team for the same reason Reed couldnt get in our team. The manager was blind or down right stupid.
tomwillo1 wrote:In that case, please explain to me why he can't get in the Aldershot team ? This is definitely a backward step, panic measure. We have re signed a player who, when he was here last time spent most of his time on his backside pleading with the ref for free kicks. Someone who, when offered a new contract at York turned it down and went off to sign for the mighty Aldershot and now when he can't get a game for them comes running back here. I can however see the logic in signing McGrath as he has a lot of experience and hopefully will add a bit of steel to our midfield. On tonight's match, if I were picking the team I would start with Rodman and McDaid in a 442 with Blair and Chambers given strict instructions to get forward and get some crosses in. However, now that Rankine is back you would assume he will play so he would take the place of McDaid.
IM DELIGHTED TO HAVE HIM BACK! JUST WHAT WE HAVE BEEN MISSING ALL SEASON, STRONG, GOOD IN THE AIR, CONSTANT THREAT, WORKS HARD AND MAKES DEFENDERS THINK. PEOPLE USED TO SLAG HIM OFF BUT I ALWAYS RATED HIM, TOP SIGNING! PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BEEN NEGATIVE!!! ROLL ON TONIGHT! COME ON CITY!!!
cityforthepremier
says...
5:53pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Colin Pratt wrote:Good hopefully they will you won't be missed! Same old rubbish from you FACT zzzzzzz
Finally something different up front. A big problem for defenders which will hopefully free up Walker to do what he can do best. That Said, If Mills starts with the same personell as Wycome he needs his head looking at. Rankine and Walker have to start in a 4-4-2 tonight. But that just wont happen will it? Oh dear another night of misery in store no doubt. If the club did refunds on season tickets I'd happily bite their hand off, FACT.
Dortmun
says...
5:57pm Tue 12 Feb 13
duffy wrote:Obviously he was and still is by some of the previous signings he has made in the past.
bartsimmo wrote:And the reason he was not an ever present for us at none league level often coming off the bench, was that manager blind ?
arsene.about.york wrote:He cant get in the Aldershot team for the same reason Reed couldnt get in our team. The manager was blind or down right stupid.
tomwillo1 wrote:In that case, please explain to me why he can't get in the Aldershot team ? This is definitely a backward step, panic measure. We have re signed a player who, when he was here last time spent most of his time on his backside pleading with the ref for free kicks. Someone who, when offered a new contract at York turned it down and went off to sign for the mighty Aldershot and now when he can't get a game for them comes running back here. I can however see the logic in signing McGrath as he has a lot of experience and hopefully will add a bit of steel to our midfield. On tonight's match, if I were picking the team I would start with Rodman and McDaid in a 442 with Blair and Chambers given strict instructions to get forward and get some crosses in. However, now that Rankine is back you would assume he will play so he would take the place of McDaid.
IM DELIGHTED TO HAVE HIM BACK! JUST WHAT WE HAVE BEEN MISSING ALL SEASON, STRONG, GOOD IN THE AIR, CONSTANT THREAT, WORKS HARD AND MAKES DEFENDERS THINK. PEOPLE USED TO SLAG HIM OFF BUT I ALWAYS RATED HIM, TOP SIGNING! PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BEEN NEGATIVE!!! ROLL ON TONIGHT! COME ON CITY!!!
kirbylad
says...
6:21pm Tue 12 Feb 13
skilly
says...
6:35pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Dave 77
says...
6:41pm Tue 12 Feb 13
15 points should see us safe.
beeryjack5on
says...
6:50pm Tue 12 Feb 13
Dortmun wrote:Gentlemen,
duffy wrote:Obviously he was and still is by some of the previous signings he has made in the past.
bartsimmo wrote:And the reason he was not an ever present for us at none league level often coming off the bench, was that manager blind ?
arsene.about.york wrote:He cant get in the Aldershot team for the same reason Reed couldnt get in our team. The manager was blind or down right stupid.
tomwillo1 wrote:In that case, please explain to me why he can't get in the Aldershot team ? This is definitely a backward step, panic measure. We have re signed a player who, when he was here last time spent most of his time on his backside pleading with the ref for free kicks. Someone who, when offered a new contract at York turned it down and went off to sign for the mighty Aldershot and now when he can't get a game for them comes running back here. I can however see the logic in signing McGrath as he has a lot of experience and hopefully will add a bit of steel to our midfield. On tonight's match, if I were picking the team I would start with Rodman and McDaid in a 442 with Blair and Chambers given strict instructions to get forward and get some crosses in. However, now that Rankine is back you would assume he will play so he would take the place of McDaid.
IM DELIGHTED TO HAVE HIM BACK! JUST WHAT WE HAVE BEEN MISSING ALL SEASON, STRONG, GOOD IN THE AIR, CONSTANT THREAT, WORKS HARD AND MAKES DEFENDERS THINK. PEOPLE USED TO SLAG HIM OFF BUT I ALWAYS RATED HIM, TOP SIGNING! PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BEEN NEGATIVE!!! ROLL ON TONIGHT! COME ON CITY!!!
the manager has just done what the majority of you on here seem to have been asking for some time now.. Yet - still lots of moaning... What can he do to please some of you? To listen to the confidently outspoken comment that fills this medium up, everytime we have a bad day, or make a signing that doesn't immediately deliver the goods, it would appear that we have a limitless and as yet untapped pool of managerial talent just waiting to step in and solve our worries.... What is it? can't you take the salary drop?
To echo the sentiments of many on here, now is the time we need to get behind the club, the team, the manager, the directors, and as supporters, lets try to pull together as one. It was a long painful stay in the conference - I think I'm too old for another one..
IMO GM and the board have both come on in leaps and bounds in their respective time here, and whilst nobody is happy with some of the poorer decisions that with the benefit of hindsight are now quite plain to see, clearly the lessons learned from mistakes tend to stick longer. It is not long since the fans main worry was that GM would be snapped up by some aspiring Championship club. I dare say that without some of those naive errors, he may have left some time ago.
It's just one club, that we all care about, lets just be united in our support...
carterjason
says...
6:53pm Tue 12 Feb 13
come on city, lets go for it from the start fast pace get the crowd going. York to win 2-0 walker and matty.
Punk_Ian
says...
7:07pm Tue 12 Feb 13
beeryjack5on wrote:I couldn't of said it better beeryjack5on
Dortmun wrote:Gentlemen,
duffy wrote:Obviously he was and still is by some of the previous signings he has made in the past.
bartsimmo wrote:And the reason he was not an ever present for us at none league level often coming off the bench, was that manager blind ?
arsene.about.york wrote:He cant get in the Aldershot team for the same reason Reed couldnt get in our team. The manager was blind or down right stupid.
tomwillo1 wrote:In that case, please explain to me why he can't get in the Aldershot team ? This is definitely a backward step, panic measure. We have re signed a player who, when he was here last time spent most of his time on his backside pleading with the ref for free kicks. Someone who, when offered a new contract at York turned it down and went off to sign for the mighty Aldershot and now when he can't get a game for them comes running back here. I can however see the logic in signing McGrath as he has a lot of experience and hopefully will add a bit of steel to our midfield. On tonight's match, if I were picking the team I would start with Rodman and McDaid in a 442 with Blair and Chambers given strict instructions to get forward and get some crosses in. However, now that Rankine is back you would assume he will play so he would take the place of McDaid.
IM DELIGHTED TO HAVE HIM BACK! JUST WHAT WE HAVE BEEN MISSING ALL SEASON, STRONG, GOOD IN THE AIR, CONSTANT THREAT, WORKS HARD AND MAKES DEFENDERS THINK. PEOPLE USED TO SLAG HIM OFF BUT I ALWAYS RATED HIM, TOP SIGNING! PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BEEN NEGATIVE!!! ROLL ON TONIGHT! COME ON CITY!!!
the manager has just done what the majority of you on here seem to have been asking for some time now.. Yet - still lots of moaning... What can he do to please some of you? To listen to the confidently outspoken comment that fills this medium up, everytime we have a bad day, or make a signing that doesn't immediately deliver the goods, it would appear that we have a limitless and as yet untapped pool of managerial talent just waiting to step in and solve our worries.... What is it? can't you take the salary drop?
To echo the sentiments of many on here, now is the time we need to get behind the club, the team, the manager, the directors, and as supporters, lets try to pull together as one. It was a long painful stay in the conference - I think I'm too old for another one..
IMO GM and the board have both come on in leaps and bounds in their respective time here, and whilst nobody is happy with some of the poorer decisions that with the benefit of hindsight are now quite plain to see, clearly the lessons learned from mistakes tend to stick longer. It is not long since the fans main worry was that GM would be snapped up by some aspiring Championship club. I dare say that without some of those naive errors, he may have left some time ago.
It's just one club, that we all care about, lets just be united in our support...
lord_love_rocket
says...
7:21pm Tue 12 Feb 13
YorkCityLuke
says...
10:38pm Tue 12 Feb 13
duffy
says...
10:44pm Tue 12 Feb 13
swh1963
says...
11:09pm Tue 12 Feb 13
openallhours
says...
11:17pm Tue 12 Feb 13
YO1
says...
11:47pm Tue 12 Feb 13
openallhours wrote:Were the pies lukewarm and the hot chocolate too expensive too? Why do you bother going, you never seem to enjoy it!
That was a far better performance and the Longhurst did us proud. McGrath looked good and Rankine was a breath of fresh air. We also looked a lot more solid and we certainly didn't miss Calamity Smith at the back. The downsides were Challinor and Chambers. Both very wasteful and let the side down. Also, Rodman!!! What's he about. A very good point but within the bigger picture, we've dropped another 2 points at home.
openallhours
says...
12:08am Wed 13 Feb 13
YO1 wrote:The pie was very nice thanks but the tea could have had a bit more milk. You should perhaps note that the crowd was just over 2500 so clearly there are lots of fans who have become tired of Mills. I on the other hand attend as many games as I can because I 'enjoy' following York. What I don't enjoy is a manager who is out of touch with the supporters and out of touch on how to get the best from his squad of players.
openallhours wrote:Were the pies lukewarm and the hot chocolate too expensive too? Why do you bother going, you never seem to enjoy it!
That was a far better performance and the Longhurst did us proud. McGrath looked good and Rankine was a breath of fresh air. We also looked a lot more solid and we certainly didn't miss Calamity Smith at the back. The downsides were Challinor and Chambers. Both very wasteful and let the side down. Also, Rodman!!! What's he about. A very good point but within the bigger picture, we've dropped another 2 points at home.
tips
says...
12:12am Wed 13 Feb 13
Those that stayed away on a cold night missed a treat .OK so we didn't win but this was so encouraging . well done to the players who gave everything for the cause
york city fc
says...
12:34pm Wed 13 Feb 13

paintitred says...
10:27am Tue 12 Feb 13
welcome back michael