Simon Atkinson, of Thornton-le-Dale, hits out as free transport withdrawn for son Joseph, 12

Parents and children in Thornton-le-Dale who are angry about the decision to withdraw free school transport. From left, Molly and Paul Tiffany, Simon and Joseph Atkinson, Jo Edmond  and Jack and Annette Bowers Parents and children in Thornton-le-Dale who are angry about the decision to withdraw free school transport. From left, Molly and Paul Tiffany, Simon and Joseph Atkinson, Jo Edmond and Jack and Annette Bowers

A FATHER says he is ‘outraged’ after being told by county council officials that his son’s home to school transport is to be withdrawn as the family live 49 metres over the qualifying distance.

Businessman Simon Atkinson received a letter last week indicating that 12-year-old Joseph’s eligibility for free transport to Lady Lumley’s School would be withdrawn from the end of the autumn term.

Following a routine check, an assessor, who walked from the Atkinsons’ home in Thornton-le-Dale to the school, found the distance to be 2.9602 miles – the qualifying distance is three miles.

The assessor concluded that the route through Pickering , Thornton-le-Dale and on the A170 was safe to be walked for a child aged 11-plus, accompanied if necessary.

Mr Atkinson, who has since set up a Facebook page and online petition to campaign against the decision, said the county council had gone ‘barmy’.

“It is absolutely disgusting to expect a boy Joseph’s age to walk to Pickering and back along the roadside through an open stretch of countryside where there is no proper path or street lighting,” he said.

“Last weekend it took my family seven minutes to cross the road and then we had to run across. From a safety aspect this just beggars belief.”

Mr Atkinson said he was not the type of person to go against official policy but felt children should not be expected to walk alongside a road which has seen four serious and seven minor accidents during the last three years.

“If that is the policy then so be it but if that is the case a pedestrian crossing and street lighting is needed along with better footpaths,” he said.

“Whatever the outcome there is no way my children will be walking along that road to school – it just isn’t safe.”

Comments have been left on Facebook from local people and others living further afield.

One supporter said: “The part of the A170 they were expected to walk on and cross is also a blackspot for accidents. How dare North Yorkshire County Council try to put children at risk.”

While another added: “It is a disgrace, how much do these people get paid to decide that you live X amount of yards out of catchment, if the rest of Thornton-le-Dale get a pass then the whole village should – behind you all the way.”

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire County Council said the home to school transport policy for pupils of secondary school age was that free transport was provided if the walking distance, measured by the nearest available route, is three miles or more from the pupil’s home address to the normal or nearest school.

“Following a routine check, it has come to light that the distance from the family home to Lady Lumley’s School has recently been walked and measured using a calibrated Tru-meter and has been verified as 2.9602 miles using the school entrance accessed via First Avenue,” they said.

“As the measurement is under the qualifying distance, Joseph will not longer qualify for assistance with transport unless the family is in receipt of the relevant low income benefits. The decision has been made in line with the county council’s home to school transport policy.”

Comments(10)

Stevie D says...
8:37am Thu 19 Jul 12

There are regular buses between Thornton le Dale and Pickering – if the family decide it's too far and too dangerous to walk (or cycle?), he could pay to use one of those buses instead.

Like it or not, the government has set these rules as the minimum standards, there has to be a cut-off point somewhere, and when councils have had their funding cut every which way, it's no surprise that they cut services to the absolute minimum. Staunchly Tory councils seem to be the worst for this.

Capt. Dobie says...
9:02am Thu 19 Jul 12

"Staunchly Tory councils seem to be the worst for this".

WHAT is the point of that statement? It's only because the previous administration spent beyond their means, we all know this and they even admitted it, so the new administration have to make up the deficit.

Personnally, I think it is Bureaucratic nonsense when there clearly is a risk from a dangerous road, an over-zealous NYCC employee has taken sharp-pencil planning to a jobsworth level. A blind-eye turned would've been discrete. Incidentally, do the buses charge NYCC per coach, or per child, if it is per coach, what is the fuss about?

Pedant's Corner; Isn't it actually 64m rather than 49m (mixing units tut tut; 1 mile = 1609.34m) and shouldn't it be 'under' 3 miles? Saying 'XXm over the distance' implies that persons living >3miles from the school don't get transport...or is it me?

Anyone for coffee?

PG Haxby says...
9:14am Thu 19 Jul 12

The council should have the disgression to make exceptions where a route is under 3 miles but along a dangerous road. Surely its a small impact if the bus is stopping nearby for local children anyway and he waits at the same stop.

Grumpy Old Man says...
12:01pm Thu 19 Jul 12

In the dim and distant past I was refused a bus pass by York City Council despite cycling more than four miles to school. Their reason? As the crow flies it was less than three miles- provided I swam the Ouse with my bike? Bureaucracy never changes!

lezyork1966 says...
3:30pm Thu 19 Jul 12

he is a teenager, wheres his bike?

Hicarrumba says...
4:00pm Thu 19 Jul 12

3 miles, used to do that for a paper round

R'Marcus says...
5:05pm Thu 19 Jul 12

Well, as a teenager he must have plenty of energy, so he can run or bike it to school.
There again, his parents can give him a lift to school it is is inclement.
Stop moaning.

York1900 says...
1:25am Fri 20 Jul 12

what is the problem they have just to pay the bus fair
It i just another benefit cut that the Tories beleave in you vote for the Tories you have to take the cuts they come up with
The benefit cuts never look like they are going to hit you but then they do
this is what a lot of people do not understand a few changes in the rules and enforcing the rules to the letter of the law make it possible for the government to make big savings

Magicman! says...
2:12am Fri 20 Jul 12

I had to pay a bus fare to go to and from school.... even when using the actual school bus. This was in the late 90's to early 2000's - and about a year in after Firstbus started running the show I had a driver knock on my head as he took exception to me using a £2 coin to pay a 60p bus fare. We took up the issue with the company who then fired the driver, we didn't go and have a moan in the press about it!
But then again all i had to do was walk down Huntington Road, not on the actual carriageway of the unlit A170.

The Riverman says...
2:16pm Fri 20 Jul 12

Petty officialdom to the nth degree from the Council that reorganised the school transport contracts last April so that two vehicles are sent to Levisham each morning & afternoon, and two vehicles to David Lane, Lockton (to the same house!)

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree