Ryedale news RSS Feed


North Yorkshire police chiefs need to save £5m

POLICE chiefs in North Yorkshire have outlined plans to save £5 million next year as they face another huge cut in Government funding.

North Yorkshire Police’s budget for 2012/13 will be thrashed out at a meeting in York next week, with the force saying the fact its officer numbers are now lower than originally anticipated could allow it to cut £1.525 million from its costs.

The end of the “special priority payments” bonus scheme for officers is earmarked to save £886,000.

But the force also expects to face a £500,000 bill for policing the Olympics and £705,000 in the cost of agency staff to help it make changes amid funding cuts.

Next week’s North Yorkshire Police Authority meeting will be told the county is likely to have 1,411 officers in 2012/13, but this is set to fall to 1,300 by 2015/16, and 30 of those who remain would be student officers.

The report said the force made the £8.9 million in savings they needed to make this year but the “unavoidable reality has been the workforce needed to reduce”.

All officers who left went voluntarily, the report said.

At Monday’s meeting, the authority must also decide whether to accept a Government grant allowing the police precept on council tax bills across North Yorkshire to be frozen next year, or vote for a 3.135 per cent rise.

North Yorkshire Police’s grant from Westminster for 2012/13 will be £73.661 million – a £5.292 million year-on-year drop – although it will also receive £1.532 million from the Government because it did not increase its council tax precept for 2011/12.

Figures show the county’s police force budget proposals include saving £2.9 million on officer salaries and £390,000 on staff salaries, with no pay rises apart from a £250 award for employees earning less than £21,000.

However, rising overtime, premises and transport costs, as well as increases in fuel and power bills, are marked out as some of the main financial pressures on the force.

Comments(7)

Sillybillies says...
1:19pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Sack all the useless PCSOs, that should save around £3 million at least. Then take an axe to the ACPO ranks, the job would run far more efficiently without them.

Sillybillies says...
1:19pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Sack all the useless PCSOs, that should save around £3 million at least. Then take an axe to the ACPO ranks, the job would run far more efficiently without them.

Gyspsy Power says...
2:02pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Take the former CC's pension off him to cover the cost of his deceit in the investigation into nepotism.

R'Marcus says...
5:20pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Sillybillies wrote:
Sack all the useless PCSOs, that should save around £3 million at least. Then take an axe to the ACPO ranks, the job would run far more efficiently without them.
You right, Sillybillies.
The PCOs are a waste of space,time and money.
The ACPO ranks are also a waste of time and money.
Concentrate on REAL policing, with REAL police officers on the BEAT!
Than is wanted in this day and age!

C3PO=PCSO says...
6:20pm Wed 8 Feb 12

C3PO's provide a vital service to the public. Playing football in the street, catching lost cats and hassling street entertainers are important issues that need a firm hi-viz hand...

RooBeck says...
6:27pm Wed 8 Feb 12

In 2003, the then North Yorkshire Police Authority (chaired by the same person who controls todays set-up), raised the police precept of the council-tax, by a whacking and eye-watering 76%, so as to meet the egotism of the then Chief Constable, a Ms. Della Cannings and who herself was subsequently shown as a poseur by spending large amounts of tax-payers monies on a personal shower and a smoking gazebo at her ostentatious HQ. Many of yesterday's national newspapers ran the story of naming and shaming local authorities and subsiduary stand-alone authorities like the police, who propose council-tax hikes on, or just under, 3.5% so as to avoid a local referendum of voters and where their views over such proposed hikes would have to be sought. Disingenuous and un-democratic were the main descriptives of these authorities. Indeed, the Leader of NYCC, a John Weighell, has very recently stated in the local news and radio media, that any council-tax hike at this time is wrong and in pegging their's, his authority empathised with financially hard-pressed residents of this county. So, how on earth can this proposal be justified both in terms of it's actual need and the political statements from both national and local governments highlighting that any hike must be avoided?? Perhaps, the North Yorkshire district of Scarborough, and the stand-alone authorities of the City of York Council and the NYPolice Authority need reminding that council-tax payers are utterly sick of being continually "screwed" for more money, are sceptical in the extreme as to how it is to be spent and overall, with no tangible improvements to the service(s) they receive??

Sillybillies says...
11:04am Thu 9 Feb 12

C3PO=PCSO says...
6:20pm Wed 8 Feb 12

C3PO's provide a vital service to the public. Playing football in the street, catching lost cats and hassling street entertainers are important issues that need a firm hi-viz hand...

Utter rubbish, they are a useless waste of space, get rid of them all.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree