Car park body identified as king

Lecturer Jo Appleby, who led the exhumation of the remains, speaking at Leicester University after tests established that a skeleton is that of King Richard III Lecturer Jo Appleby, who led the exhumation of the remains, speaking at Leicester University after tests established that a skeleton is that of King Richard III

The body of a man found buried beneath a council car park is almost certainly that of the last Plantagenet King Richard III, according to academics.

The remains, undisturbed less than a metre (3.3 feet) below ground on the site of an old friary in Leicester for more than 500 years, will now be interred in the city's cathedral.

DNA recovered from the remains, radio-carbon dating, battlefield wounds found on the skeleton and the link between what was found during the dig and what was mentioned in documentary sources from the period combined to allow Leicester University academics to conclude the identity was "beyond reasonable doubt".

King Richard, the last of the country's Plantagenet monarchs, was cut down at the decisive and bloody Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, ending the Wars of the Roses and leaving Henry VII as the new king and first of the Tudor dynasty. At the time it was recorded that King Richard had been buried in Grey Friars, a friary in the city following the battle.

Four years ago, a fundraising drive kick-started by the Richard III Society embarked on a push to finally uncover the truth of his final resting place, by making an archaeological dig on the site of the friary - a modern-day city council car park.

Archaeologists from the University of Leicester recovered a body - which showed signs of battle injuries including 10 separate wounds, and scoliosis (a curvature) of the spine, in tune with unflattering historic accounts claiming the king was hunch-backed.

Following extensive tests, Richard Buckley, dig project leader, said: "It is the academic conclusion that beyond reasonable doubt, the individual exhumed at Grey Friars in September 2011 is King Richard III - the last Plantagenet King of England."

Significant weight was placed on the DNA evidence, linking Richard III to a living descendant Michael Ibsen - through the female line of Anne of York.

Studies of the bones revealed the body of the man was aged late 20s to late 30s, with the king killed when he was 32, while radio-carbon dating revealed the male had died in the second half of the 15th, or early 16th century, which is consistent with the dates of the Wars of the Roses. Further study showed the remains to be those of a man standing 5ft 8in (1.73m), with what academics called an "unusually slender build" for a male.

The male had 10 wounds covering his body, but among these were two principal head wounds which were likely to have killed him - one delivered by sword and the other likely to have come from a long-handled polearm, thought to be a halberd. More gruesome, however, was evidence of "humiliation" injuries, including several head wounds - part of the skull was sliced away - a cut to the ribcage and a pelvic wound likely caused by an upward thrust of a weapon, through the buttock.

Comments(30)

wellnow says...
1:52pm Mon 4 Feb 13

What one very famous monarch.surely a york minster or a westminster abbey burial would be more fitting.

wellnow says...
1:53pm Mon 4 Feb 13

What one very famous monarch.surely a york minster or a westminster abbey burial would be more fitting.

morriarty says...
1:54pm Mon 4 Feb 13

The humiliation wounds highlight why it is totally wrong to rebury him in Leicester. Come on Yorkshire, let's campaign to bring him home to York for reburial, where he was respected and loved.

morriarty says...
1:55pm Mon 4 Feb 13

The humiliation wounds highlight why it is totally wrong to rebury him in Leicester. Come on Yorkshire, let's campaign to bring him home to York for reburial, where he was respected and loved.

redbluelion says...
2:04pm Mon 4 Feb 13

should be a fitting state funeral for him he was the king after all and died doing battle for that we need to pay our respect to a king who was also a hero fighting for his beloved england.

Mullarkian says...
2:35pm Mon 4 Feb 13

Why York Minster? Bury him with his son Edward Prince of Wales in Sheriff Hutton church.

ysb45 says...
2:42pm Mon 4 Feb 13

How strange that I am being censored because, apparently, my comments have upset some people. Oh shucks, I forgot; I now live in the USA where freedom of speech reigns. I have been here for over 30 years and have continued to read the press until now. Socialism is not so good. Do people really care about old bones. I always thought it was offensive to violate a grave. Obviously not! BAH HUMBUG!

Firedrake says...
4:45pm Mon 4 Feb 13

What on earth has this to do with socialism, ysb45?

Firedrake says...
4:45pm Mon 4 Feb 13

What on earth has this to do with socialism, ysb45?

R'Marcus says...
5:10pm Mon 4 Feb 13

morriarty wrote:
The humiliation wounds highlight why it is totally wrong to rebury him in Leicester. Come on Yorkshire, let's campaign to bring him home to York for reburial, where he was respected and loved.
I totally agree, Morriaty.
Bring the King, Richard III, home to York.
Re-bury his remains in the Minster.
Than would be a befitting final resting place for the monarch.

R'Marcus says...
5:10pm Mon 4 Feb 13

morriarty wrote:
The humiliation wounds highlight why it is totally wrong to rebury him in Leicester. Come on Yorkshire, let's campaign to bring him home to York for reburial, where he was respected and loved.
I totally agree, Morriaty.
Bring the King, Richard III, home to York.
Re-bury his remains in the Minster.
Than would be a befitting final resting place for the monarch.

bloodaxe says...
5:18pm Mon 4 Feb 13

ysb45 wrote:
How strange that I am being censored because, apparently, my comments have upset some people. Oh shucks, I forgot; I now live in the USA where freedom of speech reigns. I have been here for over 30 years and have continued to read the press until now. Socialism is not so good. Do people really care about old bones. I always thought it was offensive to violate a grave. Obviously not! BAH HUMBUG!
Socialism ? Grow up.

bloodaxe says...
5:18pm Mon 4 Feb 13

ysb45 wrote:
How strange that I am being censored because, apparently, my comments have upset some people. Oh shucks, I forgot; I now live in the USA where freedom of speech reigns. I have been here for over 30 years and have continued to read the press until now. Socialism is not so good. Do people really care about old bones. I always thought it was offensive to violate a grave. Obviously not! BAH HUMBUG!
Socialism ? Grow up.

bloodaxe says...
5:19pm Mon 4 Feb 13

ysb45 wrote:
How strange that I am being censored because, apparently, my comments have upset some people. Oh shucks, I forgot; I now live in the USA where freedom of speech reigns. I have been here for over 30 years and have continued to read the press until now. Socialism is not so good. Do people really care about old bones. I always thought it was offensive to violate a grave. Obviously not! BAH HUMBUG!
Socialism ? Grow up.

bloodaxe says...
5:19pm Mon 4 Feb 13

ysb45 wrote:
How strange that I am being censored because, apparently, my comments have upset some people. Oh shucks, I forgot; I now live in the USA where freedom of speech reigns. I have been here for over 30 years and have continued to read the press until now. Socialism is not so good. Do people really care about old bones. I always thought it was offensive to violate a grave. Obviously not! BAH HUMBUG!
Socialism ? Grow up.

ysb45 says...
5:28pm Mon 4 Feb 13

That reminds me of the old country where, apparently, it is offensive to have an opinion.
bloodaxe - I think you do not even know that you have a socialist government. And you tell me to "Grow Up". Check it out. Adults know that Britain is a Socialist country. So, what conclusion do you reach from that. GROW UP - What, and be like you, cetainly NOT.

Seadog says...
5:52pm Mon 4 Feb 13

What!? Most Socialists I know don't even regard Blair and Brown as Socialists ... never mind Cameron and Osborne et al!!!!

In any case, what the heck has the political colour of the UK government got to do with this news story?

Seadog says...
5:54pm Mon 4 Feb 13

Er ... my comment was directed at ysb45; not Bloodaxe

ysb45 says...
6:08pm Mon 4 Feb 13

This will be my last comment on this subject. To those who are not aware that Britain is Socialist, check out the following link. http://money.howstuf
fworks.com/socialism
5.html
I did not write the article, it just states what brand of government that Britain has chosen. Oh, by the way, I am from Tang Hall, a pretty rough spot when I was growing up. It has served me well. Seadog - you have obviously not been following the conversation.

Seadog says...
6:12pm Mon 4 Feb 13

Tang Hall begins a few yards from my house and I know it well. Not that rough really! Maybe it's changed.

bloodaxe says...
6:14pm Mon 4 Feb 13

Sorry for multiple posts. Blame the website.

RingoStarr says...
6:14pm Mon 4 Feb 13

ysb45 wrote:
This will be my last comment on this subject. To those who are not aware that Britain is Socialist, check out the following link. http://money.howstuf

fworks.com/socialism

5.html
I did not write the article, it just states what brand of government that Britain has chosen. Oh, by the way, I am from Tang Hall, a pretty rough spot when I was growing up. It has served me well. Seadog - you have obviously not been following the conversation.
"This will be my last comment on this subject"

HOORAY!

AdrianlovesYorkMinster says...
8:37pm Mon 4 Feb 13

I feel strongly that Richard III's remains should be brought to York and reburied in the Minster. We haven't got too many royal personages buried at York and it would, in part at least, be the fulfilment of his wishes.

stonegate52 says...
8:47pm Mon 4 Feb 13

Not so fast, Leicester Cathedral - Richard III was a Catholic!

Historians argue endlessly about whether Richard III was a hero or a villain, but what can be said with confidence is that he was a Catholic.
If it is established that the remains recently disinterred from a Leicester car park are indeed those of the last Plantagenet king, then a final resting-place should be in a Catholic church.
Given that Richard was first buried at the church of the Greyfriars in Leicester it would make perfect sense to place his tomb in the nearest Franciscan friary.
This turns out to be the Franciscan parish of Our Lady and St Edward in Nottingham, a small modern friary with a brick church built in the 1950s.
It's the last place once might expect to find a royal tomb but then, maybe that's a good reason for Richard to be there.
Another thought is Westminster Cathedral, which has plenty of cardinals' tombs, but no monarchs.
Richard's tomb would be a great tourist attraction and it would be conveniently close to Westminster Abbey - and the final resting-place of the man who deposed him, Henry Tudor, who became Henry VII.
History has been far kinder to Henry than Richard, proving the maxim that it is indeed the victors who determine the record.
Henry's claim to the throne was much weaker, something he shrewdly addressed by marrying Elizabeth of York.
Had Richard prevailed at the Battle of Bosworth Field, there would have been no Henry VII, therefore no Henry VIII and no Reformation.
England today might still be a Catholic country.
There is some evidence of Richard's piety. It is said that he endowed a college for 100 priests in York, though he did not live to complete the project.
He was also a generous benefactor of York Minster.
Leicester Cathedral is laying claim to be the site for Richard's tomb since the Greyfriars' church falls within its parish. Leicester's Dean, also points out that it has the only cathedral memorial to King Richard.
On the cathedral website, she states that if the identity of the remains is confirmed 'Leicester Cathedral will continue to work with the Royal Household, and with the Richard III Society, to ensure that his remains are treated with dignity and respect and are reburied with the appropriate rites and ceremonies of the Church.'
The 'appropriate' rites would surely be a Catholic funeral with a full Pontifical Requiem Mass, and only a Catholic church will do for Richard's tomb.

stonegate52 says...
8:56pm Mon 4 Feb 13

Not so fast, Leicester Cathedral or York Minster - King Richard III was a Roman Catholic!

Historians argue endlessly about whether Richard III was a hero or a villain, but what can be said with confidence is that he was a Roman Catholic.
If it is established that the remains recently disinterred from a Leicester car park are indeed those of the last Plantagenet king, then a final resting-place should be in a Roman Catholic church.
The 'appropriate' rites would surely be a Catholic funeral with a full Pontifical Requiem Mass, and only a Catholic church will do for King Richard III's tomb.

YoRkIe59 says...
9:42pm Mon 4 Feb 13

why the heck would we want to bury him in Nottinghamshire,he was a Yorkshire king and should be buried in Yorkshire not least as was mentioned it would be a great tourist attraction what connection did he have with notts?.Also i would have to respectfully disagree with the comment that had Richard won the battle of Bosworth there would have been no reformation,how do you come to that conclusion Henry the eighth was basically still a catholic to his death his issues with the catholic church being of a more personal nature than any reformist ideals.And the reformation still happened in plenty of countries nothing to do with England and the influence of the tudors,i rather think even if Richard the thirds line had prevailed at whatever point sooner or later the reformation would have happened in England just the same.Merely my opinion of course.

walkdengirl says...
9:55pm Mon 4 Feb 13

He should be brought back and buried in York Minster amongst his people

AdrianlovesYorkMinster says...
10:16pm Mon 4 Feb 13

I think the Reformation would happened with or without Henry VIII. He was merely the accident which precipitated it in England at the time. Trust me, I've read enough 16th Century history to know! Arguments as to whether Richard III's remains should be reinterred in an Anglican or RC have been rendered largely redundant by the present day ecumenical context and the excellent relationship between the two churches. My understanding is that Richard III wanted a chantry chapel establishing for him at York Minster. Whilst that wouldn't be possible nowadays, there's no reason why (subject to appropriate faculty jurisdiction) he shouldn't be reinterred at York and a fitting memorial provided. The ceremony could be a dignified Anglican one but with medieval elements to it and I don't see any reason why, subject to the Dean & Chapter's consent, there shouldn't be Roman Catholic participation.

Omega Point says...
12:43am Tue 5 Feb 13

So not Leicester Cathedral but York.
Snobbery at it's ugliest, grow up

AdrianlovesYorkMinster says...
9:17am Tue 5 Feb 13

With respect I don't think snobbery comes into it. There are sound historical grounds for burying the remains in York. Leicester Cathedral is a modern 'parish church' cathedral which has scant claim to remains beyond the accident of them currently lying within its parish.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree