Community stadium news RSS Feed


Coppergate and Castle Piccadilly shops plan ‘would help keep retailers’

THE owners of a York shopping centre say its proposed £20 million revamp could prevent retailers turning their backs on the city.

LaSalle UK Ventures Fund, which owns the Coppergate Centre and land earmarked for the £200 million Castle Piccadilly development, warned this week that it would abandon its plans and sell the sites if an expansion of Monks Cross Shopping Park and a neighbouring scheme including John Lewis and Marks & Spencer stores are approved.

Monks Cross Shopping Park Trust, whose plans involve fitting mezzanine floors to existing shops and attracting anchor stores, said the scheme would create more than 300 full-time jobs and “safeguard” current staff.

“We want to offer a high-quality shopping experience and our proposals will help us achieve this,” said a spokesman.

“Monks Cross Shopping Park provides retailers with units to meet modern shopping requirements which cannot be met within York city centre. The proposed changes are designed to ensure the success of the shopping park is sustained.”

Comments(16)

Justinheaven says...
10:24am Sat 4 Feb 12

they have talked about the Coppergate/Piccadill
y development for years and years

Torycouncil2015 says...
10:27am Sat 4 Feb 12

The soone they sell it to someone with real plans for the city centre the better. They've tried to get the council and people Of York over a barrell and it has back fired spectacularly

Malcolm says...
1:21pm Sat 4 Feb 12

I'm a *resident* of York and I endorse the Monks Cross development scheme.

BigJon says...
1:58pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Their 'proposed' £20 million revamp? Has anyone seen anything of these proposals in the last few years? Seems they're quite happy sitting on the land and doing nothing as long as it holds it's value but as soon as any competition arises they spit their dummy out. Maybe if they'd actually done some 'proposing' then they'd have have a leg to stand on....

speaks99 says...
3:20pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Exactly to all the points above. Had they made some moves in the past, Oh, I don't know, 20years(??) Then they could have been taken a little seriously. To pipe up now, when the proposed development threatens to devalue their land, smacks of desperation. The council must not be held to blackmail over this.

Eric Bartholomew says...
3:29pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Le Salle...snooze you lose

speaks99 says...
3:32pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Besides - where is the evidence that retailers are turning their backs on the city? Headline grabbing, self publicising, blackmailing. Just a few words to describe La Salle.

R'Marcus says...
3:40pm Sat 4 Feb 12

There is a place for Monks Cross and the city centre development!
More shops means competition for the shoppers, and this will good for all parties!

Sarah York says...
4:13pm Sat 4 Feb 12

R'Marcus wrote:
There is a place for Monks Cross and the city centre development!
More shops means competition for the shoppers, and this will good for all parties!
Well exactly plus no one's saying it's 'either or'. LaSalle, rather than utterly embarrassing themselves and holding OUR City at ransom, could actually start coming up with ideas for the land they have than just sitting on In and using it as nothing but a bargaining chip for themselves. Anyone who nods and agrees with this bit of blackmail clearly doesn't have the best interests of York at hand whether they do want the monks cross development to go ahead or not. Shocking actions from LaSalle.

roskoboskovic says...
6:26pm Sat 4 Feb 12

they ve had more than 20 years to do something and because of their prevarication it has all backfired.just admit it lasalle you gambled and lost so its time to sell to a real developer.

Sawday2 says...
6:33pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Let them sell it. Whoever buys will probably develop the land not leave it untouched awaiting land prices to rise like La Salle has been doing.

Even AndyD says...
7:36pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Time for Press complaints commission. One sided reporting here - a developer doesn't like competition, well what do you know! Yet we see more column inches than the death of Diana. Ditto Adam Sinclair and his vested interest brigade. Would love to see who the main advertisers are with the Press, suspect we might see some interesting links.

mickrick says...
8:08pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Richard wants to go out on a high.
Swansong comes to mind..........mind you he has lost a lot of weight and the new glasses suit him.

Magicman! says...
9:36pm Sat 4 Feb 12

if a piccadilly shops plan would help to keep retailler in York, then why wasn't it built at least 10 years ago?
As has been said, there is a place for both an expanded Coppergate/Piccadill
y centre AND an enlarged Monks Cross, just as the Traffod Centre and Manchester's Arndale Centre compliment each other - and both work together to attract crowds of shoppers... something which York is missing out on to other cities along the tracks (Leeds, Sheffield, Newcastle, Manchester)

TerryYork says...
11:58pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Why isn't the Press investigating the follow, noted perviously??

" LaSalle’s UK ventures Fund is listed as dormant according to companycheck.co.uk. The site also reveals that the company has only one listed director, a Mister Sunil Patel. A quick check on Google shows that according to company-director-che

ck.co.uk Mister Patel has listed directorships of 85 companies! Two of those companies sound vaguely familiar. The first, Lasalle UK ventures property UK1, is listed as, ‘in administration.’ The second, Lasalle UK ventures property UK2, is listed as dissolved."

Come on York Press. INVESTIGATE THIS!

TerryYork says...
12:07am Sun 5 Feb 12

Even AndyD wrote:
Time for Press complaints commission. One sided reporting here - a developer doesn't like competition, well what do you know! Yet we see more column inches than the death of Diana. Ditto Adam Sinclair and his vested interest brigade. Would love to see who the main advertisers are with the Press, suspect we might see some interesting links.
I agree with this. Terrible one-sided reporting from the Press. I again ask why they didn't utilise a basic amount of journalism on the above before giving this ghost company free advertising.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree