Community stadium news RSS Feed


Community stadium firm could also be in charge of leisure centres

THE company chosen to run York’s community stadium could also be put in charge of the city’s other council-owned leisure facilities.

Officers at City of York Council are set to be asked to start the search for a firm to operate and maintain the proposed new home for York City FC and York City Knights at Monks Cross.

The authority’s cabinet member for leisure, culture and social inclusion, Coun Sonja Crisp, will also decide next week whether a contract for running the stadium and the neighbouring Waterworld pool should include responsibility for operating Energise leisure centre and Yearsley Swimming Pool, with the aim of cutting costs and unlocking extra investment.

Oakgate (Monks Cross) Ltd’s outline planning application for the 6,000-seater venue on the site of the existing Huntington Stadium, as well as a retail complex boasting John Lewis and Marks & Spencer stores, is set to go before the council’s planning committee within weeks. A full business case for the stadium’s operation will be presented to the authority’s cabinet in March.

A report by Charlie Croft, the council’s assistant director for communities and culture, and stadium project manager Tim Atkins, said the procurement process, if approved, would identify a preferred bidder - which it said could be a social enterprise - by next January, and the contract would begin next April.

“There is a need for an investment strategy for the city’s leisure facilities to ensure their long-term sustainability,” said the report.

“This is particularly the case with the facilities at the Huntington Stadium site – Waterword, Courtneys gym and the stadium – where there has been limited investment over the last 14 years.

“A unique opportunity exists to secure this much-needed investment by including the operation of the city’s leisure facilities – Energise and Yearsley – as part of a community leisure contract.”

The report said appointing a company purely to run the stadium would not be “commercially desirable”, but the chosen contractor could bring in specialists to concentrate on operating the venue or allow City or the Knights to do it.

Comments(9)

Abstemious says...
10:44am Wed 4 Jan 12

Just nipping out to buy shares in UK Entertainment Online Ltd

The Great Buda says...
11:22am Wed 4 Jan 12

Interesting comments on the Radio just now from Alexander. The same market research that recommended the closure of the Union Terrace Car Park is the same one that City Centre traders are now saying is proof that Monks Cross the second coming will destroy the City Centre. Yet they said it was flawed and out of touch not that long ago.

Talk about having your cake and eating it!

Even AndyD says...
12:12pm Wed 4 Jan 12

York Chamber of Commerce is full of double-standards in my opinion. Against Coppergate II one minute, for it the next. Adam Sinclair against out of town retail, but owns China China at MacArthur Glen. Cross over and conflicts of interest re Civic Trusts - it all just stinks to high heaven. Time this lot were ignored and not given any more column inches.

duffy says...
12:45pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Even AndyD wrote:
York Chamber of Commerce is full of double-standards in my opinion. Against Coppergate II one minute, for it the next. Adam Sinclair against out of town retail, but owns China China at MacArthur Glen. Cross over and conflicts of interest re Civic Trusts - it all just stinks to high heaven. Time this lot were ignored and not given any more column inches.
Never underestimate the power of greed and self interest.

1localtrader says...
1:08pm Wed 4 Jan 12

sounds promising to me, hopefully this will include looking at the outrageous subsidy needed to keep yearsley pool open, its diabolical, I can imagine the whine if YCFC or the Knights asked for a fraction of that subsidy

Mike Warwick says...
3:20pm Wed 4 Jan 12

Let's hope that the cost of watching sport is affordable. With shareholders to support I fear that we are in for a nasty surprise.

LibDem says...
3:36pm Wed 4 Jan 12

The Press article fails to mention that the Council hopes to attract a tender from a "not for profit" social enterprise company like Greenwich Leisure Limited (GLL) who have run the existing Huntington facilities for the last 12 months.

Companies like this plough back any profits into additional or modernised leisure facilities in the area.

Mike Warwick says...
8:59am Thu 5 Jan 12

How much have they ploughed back in?

LibDem says...
4:22pm Thu 5 Jan 12

Mike Warwick wrote:
How much have they ploughed back in?
The Council gets around £160,000 a year in rent for the Huntington stadium and Waterworld.
GLL haven't been operating in the City long enough to have gerated much in the way of a surplus (nor would they be likely to after having paid that kind of rent!).

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree