Business news RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


National Railway Museum's £21 million facelift scrapped

The Great Hall at the National Railway Museum The Great Hall at the National Railway Museum

A £21 MILLION pound project to transform the Great Hall at York’s National Railway Museum (NRM) has been abandoned in the wake of Government cuts.

Bosses at the museum in Leeman Road said they had taken the “sad” decision that the NRM+ scheme was no longer viable after an application for £7 million from the Regional Growth Fund was turned down earlier this month.

The project had been set to tell the spectacular story of how railways have shaped lives and the modern world through new multimedia and multi-sensory displays.

There would also have been greater access to the collection and improved visitor facilities, and the work was expected to increase visitor numbers to 1.15 million per year and boost the regional economy by £25 million.

But there was at least some good news for railway buffs with the announcement that, because of the cancellation of the scheme, the iconic Mallard locomotive would be coming back to the NRM before the end of the year, instead of 2013, when NRM+ had been due to finish.

A spokeswoman said yesterday that the growth fund bid had been made to compensate for the loss of two grants of £5 million, from Yorkshire Forward and the Department of Culture Media and Sport.

She said the museum had received the tentative agreement of the Heritage Lottery Fund to provide match-funding of £10 million if the growth fund bid was successful, but that was now lost as well.

She said, after assessing the impact, the museum realised there was no chance in the current climate of closing the significant funding gap.

The £1.8 million in funding which had already been secured from private and public sources would now go to other work.

She said: “We have other exciting projects in the offing, including the recently begun redevelopment of the museum’s city entrance and shop, and refurbishment of Station Hall.

“Moreover, we are in a position to make some minor but significant adjustments to the Great Hall, making use of vehicles which were restored in anticipation of NRM+ being successfully delivered.”

She said Mallard, which left the NRM last year for Locomotion, the National Railway Museum at Shildon, County Durham, would be the star attraction in an exhibition at a museum in Nuremberg, Germany, marking the 75th anniversary of Germany’s short ownership of the world-speed crown, before returning to York in November.

Steve Davies, NRM director, said: “We’re very excited that Mallard is going to fly the flag for British engineering in Germany, at an event run by our international partner, the DB Museum.

“It should be a fascinating journey – Mallard will leave her current home, the National Railway Museum in Shildon, by road, and then will travel by ship to a German port. Once there, she will travel along the tracks hauled by a DB locomotive, accompanied by the NRM’s expert engineers and observed by hundreds of rail fans.”

Meanwhile, the museum is looking forward to bumper crowds over the two bank holiday weekends.

Its spokeswoman said: “We’re definitely hoping for an increase in visitor numbers, come rain or shine.”

The Press - Comment

Every cloud has a silver lining

IT IS desperately disappointing that the National Railway Museum has had to abandon a multi-million pound project to transform its Great Hall.

The scheme, which would have seen the hall revamped with multimedia and multisensory displays that told the story of how the railways have shaped the modern world, is yet another victim of Government cuts.

The museum decided to pull the plug after its bid for £7 million from the Regional Growth Fund was turned down. As a result, it also lost all hope of securing £10 million of match funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund.

Museum bosses estimated that if the scheme had gone ahead, it would have increased visitor numbers to 1.15 million a year – and would have boosted the regional economy by £25 million.

This, then, is a genuinely damaging blow to this city’s and this region’s attempts to recover from the recession.

In one sense, however, it is perhaps understandable. At a time of deep public spending cuts, when across the country vital services for vulnerable people are being slashed to the bone, there might have been a few raised eyebrows in some quarters at so much Government money being spent on a museum.

And there is a silver lining to this news. Because the revamp of the Great Hall will not now be going ahead, the iconic Mallard will return to York two years earlier than it would otherwise have done. The National Railway Museum remains, meanwhile, one of the world’s truly great museums: a fantastic family day out, as well as an inspiring record of the way the railways made us what we are today. York is lucky to have it.

What do you think? - Click to comment

Comments(17)

telos says...
11:39am Fri 22 Apr 11

it is very disappointing to see that the revamp is not going to happen. cutting too far and too fast is going to drag this country backwards not move us forwards. the sooner this rediculous government are removed the better. how long before we are using a horse and cart to get about, leaving those majestic old steam engines looking like future stsate of the art technology.

rogue84 says...
12:40pm Fri 22 Apr 11

this revamp was a must for the NRM which is beginning to look quite dated inside and really could have done with a face-lift to include more interactive displays for the kids and a few more hands-on areas.
this is the country's national museum, it should be allowed to continue as such with the backing of the government.

marvell says...
12:44pm Fri 22 Apr 11

It's good to see that The Press has taken a balanced view of this sad news unlike "telos". When will people actually wake up to the crippling debt this country faces instead of making stupid anti-government comments. We are paying £100 million per day in interest so hard cuts are essential. For all those who believe Labour would be any different - firstly they landed us in this mess and secondly their proposed cuts are 90% of the current ones anyway so virtually no different.

Even AndyD says...
1:28pm Fri 22 Apr 11

Glad to see the Mallard is coming back to where it belongs. I guess the cuts just have to be seen as temporary, hopefully further improvements will happen at some stage.
Maybe time to review the 'free' entrance fees, at least for non-residents. Although I'm guessing that the NRM get grants because of this policy.

telos says...
2:12pm Fri 22 Apr 11

labour would be different because they would not cut as deep as quickly, therefore allowing growth. as a nation, we have only just recently finished paying off america for the ww2 debt. debt is a fact of life. it should not be used as an excuse or scare tactics for rediculous cuts to protect the upper classes.

Even AndyD says...
2:23pm Fri 22 Apr 11

The debts are pretty immense and unsustainable this time though, Telos. Something does need to be done, but I agree about ideology - even the Thatcher government had a more progressive (fairer) pack back ratio in the 1980s than this mob. Is it 4:1 in terms of cuts to taxation, this time, if I recall correctly? Thatcher was 2:2. No doubt the poor are being hit and rich tax dodgers supported.

Vic Mellons says...
2:42pm Fri 22 Apr 11

Another victim of Gordonomics

Roganjoshman says...
7:27pm Fri 22 Apr 11

Why doesn't The National Rail Museum Charge eh eh eh. I can't understand that. All these Yanks and Chinese people snapping away with their cameras? Charge anybody without a British pasport £10 entry and that is still DIRT CHEAP. There you go - within 5 years there is your 21 Million!!!!!

yorkshirelad says...
7:28pm Fri 22 Apr 11

Gordonomics... oh yeah.... we just didn't notice that Gordon was also in charge of Greece, Ireland, USA, Portugal, Italy,Spain, Iceland......

Carry on with the spin that it's all Labour's fault, but really, only fools would believe that.

Of course any party in government would have to rein back after the worldwide recession. But the recession is providing cover for ideologically led extremism from this government. Why else would the public sector face an onslaught while the bankers are hardly touched?

Watch this space... this may be partly to deal with the deficit but perhaps mainly it's to fund pre-election tax cuts for big business and high earners. The same old Tories....

petethefeet says...
10:00pm Fri 22 Apr 11

yorkshirelad wrote:
Gordonomics... oh yeah.... we just didn't notice that Gordon was also in charge of Greece, Ireland, USA, Portugal, Italy,Spain, Iceland...... Carry on with the spin that it's all Labour's fault, but really, only fools would believe that. Of course any party in government would have to rein back after the worldwide recession. But the recession is providing cover for ideologically led extremism from this government. Why else would the public sector face an onslaught while the bankers are hardly touched? Watch this space... this may be partly to deal with the deficit but perhaps mainly it's to fund pre-election tax cuts for big business and high earners. The same old Tories....
Yorkshirelad. I dunno how old you are but i got married in 1975. That was just before Dennis Healey had to go cap-in-hand to the IMF for money. Nobody would lend money to us owing to huge budget deficit and therefore he had no choice. As a result, vat on 'luxury' goods was raised from 8% to 25% and that is what I paid on my sofa, fridge, freezer, etc, etc.....The current fiscal restraint means that we have kept our AAA rating. Accordingly, we are only paying about 3.1% on one trillion pounds of debt. This contrasts with 6% for Ireland and 12% for Greece.
The slight on Gordon is well-deserved. You can vote for all the spend that you want but the truth is that 'excess' doesn't work. Economists reckon that a government should spend 37% of GDP in the good times rising to 43% in the bad times. Unfortunately, labour was spending 43% in the good times and this has given us nowhere to move. We can only borrow for a short while, for the reasons given above. We cannot raise taxes (much) further as we incur the law of diminishing returns (the revenue stated that the rise to a top-rate of 50% should raise 9 billion but the outcome will be only 2 billion in reality). So, the only answer is cuts. The skill is to get the right cuts and I would tender that this is low-priority spend?
Now. I've detailed my analysis of the situation with supporting evidense. How about you try doing the same without the socio-political bias?

Maquis says...
1:36am Sat 23 Apr 11

The revamp was a "would be nice" not an "essential" therefore it can be put off until the financial situation is better. Those millions will now not need to be borrowed, and will not cost us even more in interest.
Once the economy is back on track, we can afford to spend on the "would be nice" projects, until then it can wait.

Frodo Baggins says...
10:54am Sat 23 Apr 11

Maquis wrote:
The revamp was a "would be nice" not an "essential" therefore it can be put off until the financial situation is better. Those millions will now not need to be borrowed, and will not cost us even more in interest. Once the economy is back on track, we can afford to spend on the "would be nice" projects, until then it can wait.
Can't this also be applied to the new coucil offices but aren'tn the libdums proceeding with that waste of £42m?

Maquis says...
5:26pm Sat 23 Apr 11

Frodo Baggins wrote:
Maquis wrote:
The revamp was a "would be nice" not an "essential" therefore it can be put off until the financial situation is better. Those millions will now not need to be borrowed, and will not cost us even more in interest. Once the economy is back on track, we can afford to spend on the "would be nice" projects, until then it can wait.
Can't this also be applied to the new coucil offices but aren'tn the libdums proceeding with that waste of £42m?
Absolutely, and the alterations to the library entrance and so many other projects that have cost millions to both the council tax payers and the treasury in general,

pedalling paul says...
9:15am Sun 24 Apr 11

Even AndyD wrote:
Glad to see the Mallard is coming back to where it belongs. I guess the cuts just have to be seen as temporary, hopefully further improvements will happen at some stage. Maybe time to review the 'free' entrance fees, at least for non-residents. Although I'm guessing that the NRM get grants because of this policy.
Mallard will return earlier than previously planned from Shildon to the NRM, but is making a detour via the German Rail Museum at Nuremberg, for an anniversary celebration of their their fastest-ever steam loco. It reached 124.5 mph and held the world record for a short while until Mallard pipped it by reaching 126 mph.

Garrowby Turnoff says...
11:27am Sun 24 Apr 11

There should be free entrance into the NRM for anyone wearing an anorak.

Standard 4MT says...
7:57pm Sun 24 Apr 11

IMHO a good thing.
The general waste of money this museum throws around is ridiculous.
It should start spending as if living in the real world.
I stopped going as were many others if this disaster proceeded.
Why do you think the visitor figures keep going down at York museum?
Its become crap!!

beechgrover says...
12:58pm Mon 25 Apr 11

NRM could get excellent value for a mere pittance of (say) £100,000 by cleaning up the buildings it owns opposite the Leeman Road entrance, cleaning up the pavements and tunnel on the approaches to the museum, and employing a cleaner to keep it nice for a couple of years.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree