Top Gun pilots create a buzz (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Jet fighter planes over York create a buzz
8:23am Saturday 20th October 2012 in News
By Richard Catton, richard.catton@thepress.co.uk
IT WAS all eyes to the sky in York as two American jet fighters roared over the city during morning rush hour.
The fighter planes appeared to circle an area in the west of the city yesterday at about 9.30am, prompting readers to contact The Press and also ask questions on social networking web sites to speculate what the planes were and what they were doing.
One person posted on Twitter “just seen and heard two Tornado-type planes having a fly about over York, they made a right blooming racket”, while another writer said they “almost spilled their tea” as the jets roared over.
Robin Rawson, from Heworth, said: “They were making quite a racket. I think they were Typhoons. They seemed to be flying towards each other and one of them seemed to be going very slowly.
“I thought if something horrendous happens there was going to be a disaster over York.
“I’m not sure how high they were flying but they were below cloud level.”
The mystery was solved by a spokesman from RAF Linton-on-Ouse, who said the two planes were American F-15s, but that they were not flying below the permitted height.
He said: “They were two American F-15s from Lakenheath in Suffolk.They were about 6,000 to 10,000 feet over The vale of York and the North Sea.They aren’t using afterburners, but they are noisy.”
As well as the British military, RAF Lakenheath is also home to the American 48th Fighter, also known as Liberty Wing.
Comments(70)
Sawday2
says...
8:43am Sat 20 Oct 12
How very English. Brilliant!
roskoboskovic
says...
8:58am Sat 20 Oct 12
whitehorse
says...
9:02am Sat 20 Oct 12
Even AndyD
says...
9:04am Sat 20 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople
says...
9:40am Sat 20 Oct 12
Mister Sheen
says...
10:39am Sat 20 Oct 12
YSTClinguist
says...
11:15am Sat 20 Oct 12
baileyuk
says...
11:16am Sat 20 Oct 12
clairemw
says...
11:20am Sat 20 Oct 12
clairemw
says...
11:21am Sat 20 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople
says...
11:53am Sat 20 Oct 12
l all this winging when the spit fire, hurricane and lancaster flew metres above the city mid year! and i know what had the most unreliable engines. one of those had 100times the chance of failing than the modern military planes flying now.
Still at least we know who the anti american people we have on here. 1 question. nationality?
goatman
says...
11:59am Sat 20 Oct 12
I suppose that's as good as we get now that the Elvington Air Show is no more.
Protography
says...
12:02pm Sat 20 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople
says...
12:02pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Mister Sheen wrote:Flight engineer speaking above every 1. He Knows the stalling speed of a F15 and as he had his radar gun out could tell they were close to stalling. even though distance greatly restricts a persons ability to tell speed. not heard any 1 saying they got such a good view either especially with the fog. i was lucky that there was a clearing and just saw them high up. Another person also said they needed there binoclulars.
They were well below the cloud for the duration - how else would people have got such a good view of them! Not bothered about the noise but they were engaged in manoeuvres that involved flying towards each other to within relatively close distances of each other! Also, they weren't flying all that fast and gave the impression that they could run the risk of stalling. All this over a heavily-populated area! Military equivalent of 'joy-riding' in my view.
good job we all have our own views and not just the 1 person telling us what they believe we should all think.
You could be a politician........
Mister Sheen
says...
12:54pm Sat 20 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople wrote:Graduate physicist, actually. One that has seen Top Gun four times!
Mister Sheen wrote:Flight engineer speaking above every 1. He Knows the stalling speed of a F15 and as he had his radar gun out could tell they were close to stalling. even though distance greatly restricts a persons ability to tell speed. not heard any 1 saying they got such a good view either especially with the fog. i was lucky that there was a clearing and just saw them high up. Another person also said they needed there binoclulars.
They were well below the cloud for the duration - how else would people have got such a good view of them! Not bothered about the noise but they were engaged in manoeuvres that involved flying towards each other to within relatively close distances of each other! Also, they weren't flying all that fast and gave the impression that they could run the risk of stalling. All this over a heavily-populated area! Military equivalent of 'joy-riding' in my view.
good job we all have our own views and not just the 1 person telling us what they believe we should all think.
You could be a politician........
Mister Sheen
says...
12:56pm Sat 20 Oct 12
baileyuk
says...
1:03pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Mister Sheen
says...
1:06pm Sat 20 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople wrote:'(La?)st time a military plane crashed over a city in England?' - I don't recall either! Probably down to the fact that they're not supposed to prat about over a densely populated area, unlike the two yesterday!
it seems we have a bunch of misserys on this web site. st time a military plane crashed over a city in england? st time an airliner crashed over a city? bet it is more! one off. i have been hearing these super load planes flying over for the last 6 months. so its not just american planes then is it. and it has always been the smae level of noise. the difference this time was i could see them for the first time as i had a cloud clearing. and in the west of york where i live they were high enough up to be classed as 6-10k ft.
l all this winging when the spit fire, hurricane and lancaster flew metres above the city mid year! and i know what had the most unreliable engines. one of those had 100times the chance of failing than the modern military planes flying now.
Still at least we know who the anti american people we have on here. 1 question. nationality?
Buzz Light-year
says...
1:07pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
USAFkid
says...
1:15pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Remember, these guys aren't Tom Cruise Top Gun idiots, they're serious professionals who work and train and must keep up extensive flying hours. It's just a bit alarming for people who aren't used to it. I was just happy to see a reminder of home.
Mister Sheen
says...
1:27pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Buzz Light-year wrote:Not likely! Plane wreckage might come in through the roof!
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
capt spaulding
says...
1:32pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Buzz Light-year wrote:Thought you would have been up there with them Buzz , infinity and beyond .
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
Mister Sheen
says...
1:33pm Sat 20 Oct 12
capt spaulding wrote:And we all know what happened to him when he tried to fly............!
Buzz Light-year wrote:Thought you would have been up there with them Buzz , infinity and beyond .
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
bob the builder
says...
1:49pm Sat 20 Oct 12
lowbeam
says...
2:42pm Sat 20 Oct 12
What is all the fuss about? They need to train..I can remember back in the late 70's been 'buzzed' by A10's up in Rosedale,and we were in a car!
Jazzper
says...
3:06pm Sat 20 Oct 12
lowbeam wrote:I agree, makes you wonder what lengths some people will go to...what a fuss about nowt! over and done with in less than 10mins. But I for one enjoyed watching them while it lasted.
I watched them for 5,6 mins at Exhibition Square,they were not actualy above the city but further over,Rufforth Tockwith way.
What is all the fuss about? They need to train..I can remember back in the late 70's been 'buzzed' by A10's up in Rosedale,and we were in a car!
voiceofnormalpeople
says...
3:51pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Mister Sheen wrote:Better go and hide under a rock then. But what if the rock is to heavy? or what if its not big enough.
Buzz Light-year wrote:Not likely! Plane wreckage might come in through the roof!
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
80 knots, took you long enough to look that up.
And i don't believe any military air craft are allowed to pratt around.
ps Did you have a set of points in the sky to judge the speed the aircraft flew between them? and to think all the special equiptment needed to be able to tell the speed an air craft is flying... maybe you could offer your services and save them millions in wasted technology.
Mister Sheen
says...
4:28pm Sat 20 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople wrote:Style sounds familiar - is that you, Chissy ??
Mister Sheen wrote:Better go and hide under a rock then. But what if the rock is to heavy? or what if its not big enough.
Buzz Light-year wrote:Not likely! Plane wreckage might come in through the roof!
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
80 knots, took you long enough to look that up.
And i don't believe any military air craft are allowed to pratt around.
ps Did you have a set of points in the sky to judge the speed the aircraft flew between them? and to think all the special equiptment needed to be able to tell the speed an air craft is flying... maybe you could offer your services and save them millions in wasted technology.
baileyuk
says...
4:39pm Sat 20 Oct 12
goatman
says...
5:34pm Sat 20 Oct 12
.co.uk/news/9563243.
The_day_a_jet_crashe
d_in_hospital___s_gr
ounds/r/?ref=rss
ouseswimmer
says...
6:50pm Sat 20 Oct 12
Mister Sheen wrote:As any fool knows Top Gun used F-14's these were F-15's!
voiceofnormalpeople wrote:Graduate physicist, actually. One that has seen Top Gun four times!Mister Sheen wrote: They were well below the cloud for the duration - how else would people have got such a good view of them! Not bothered about the noise but they were engaged in manoeuvres that involved flying towards each other to within relatively close distances of each other! Also, they weren't flying all that fast and gave the impression that they could run the risk of stalling. All this over a heavily-populated area! Military equivalent of 'joy-riding' in my view.Flight engineer speaking above every 1. He Knows the stalling speed of a F15 and as he had his radar gun out could tell they were close to stalling. even though distance greatly restricts a persons ability to tell speed. not heard any 1 saying they got such a good view either especially with the fog. i was lucky that there was a clearing and just saw them high up. Another person also said they needed there binoclulars. good job we all have our own views and not just the 1 person telling us what they believe we should all think. You could be a politician........
rtj888
says...
6:56pm Sat 20 Oct 12
spottycow
says...
7:06pm Sat 20 Oct 12
muckybutt
says...
8:23pm Sat 20 Oct 12
These chaps have a job to do for starters regardless of whether they are American or British, they are there as part of the safety net for the UK from terrorists or the Russians...yes the Russians do still try it on with their spy planes.
You moan about the noise and the height they were flying at ! you want to try living up in the Wolds near Driffield, they as well as the RAF Typhoons regularly dog fight over here, making a terriffic din, yes windows rattle but houses ? come on dont talk garbage. Height wise over here they regularly go over at 500Ft their legal minimum height to fly in peace time over populated areas....if they did that over York then you would have something to moan about, so do us a favour you whingers....shut up !!
ReginaldBiscuit
says...
9:16pm Sat 20 Oct 12
jumbojet
says...
10:42pm Sat 20 Oct 12
pedalling paul
says...
11:05pm Sat 20 Oct 12
piaggio1
says...
11:50pm Sat 20 Oct 12
please tell me this guy,s comments were made up!!
what a absolute wimp
Lineker's Lad
says...
9:05am Sun 21 Oct 12
I'm really quite upset by this, whatever it is.
voiceofnormalpeople
says...
10:30am Sun 21 Oct 12
pedalling paul wrote:I thought you put that vibration device on your seat yourself?
The vibration almost made me fall off my bike.......!
voiceofnormalpeople
says...
10:31am Sun 21 Oct 12
jumbojet wrote:I think this coment is the total load of nonsense.
What a load of total nonsense from various members of this forum. If you are going to comment you really should know what you are talking about. The USAF or the RAF should not be playing games around the City of York, they have basically the whole of Yorkshire as an area of intense aviation activity, and they should NOT be playing games within the glide area of a large population. Totally out of order and someone needs a kick right up the aspect ratio, including RAF spokespersons who tell us who the idiots were, they should be controlling them. Chaos.
Mister Sheen
says...
10:46am Sun 21 Oct 12
ReginaldBiscuit wrote:Ha ha, now I KNOW who you are Squadron Leader!!
You could have some fun with these guys. You can trigger the Missile Approach Warning system on this particular type of aircraft quite easily by fooling the SAM sensors. The 2K12 Kub's used to carry spoofers to give enemy pilots 'winking sphincters'.
Mister Sheen
says...
10:49am Sun 21 Oct 12
piaggio1 wrote:Actually, he's 6'2 and built like a brick exterior lavatory! And a rocker.......;o)
Robin Rawson??
please tell me this guy,s comments were made up!!
what a absolute wimp
Mister Sheen
says...
1:09pm Sun 21 Oct 12
Scarlet Pimpernel
says...
1:50pm Sun 21 Oct 12
@cllrtraceysl tweeted,
#noiseoveryork. Close flying over York. Do they realise over city centre
Does she realise that they follow flight paths and don't get lost ? Not everyone loses their sense of direction like York Council and the directionless labour councillors directing York to decay and disaster !
Scarlet Pimpernel
says...
1:55pm Sun 21 Oct 12
pedalling paul wrote:This explains why the phone lines to the RAF and USAF were blocked yesterday after your post......... everyone in York was requesting an increase of this activity, to coincide with your daily cycling times ;-)
The vibration almost made me fall off my bike.......!
Next time, you might not keep your balance ?
imk
says...
2:47pm Sun 21 Oct 12
Buzz Light-year
says...
3:52pm Sun 21 Oct 12
Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:Wait...
@cllrtraceysl tweeted, #noiseoveryork. Close flying over York. Do they realise over city centreDoes she realise that they follow flight paths and don't get lost ? Not everyone loses their sense of direction like York Council and the directionless labour councillors directing York to decay and disaster !
Copy and pasting councillors' tweets from Twitter to here?
Stalking much?
Acting out personal grudges much?
This story has nothing whatsoever in any way conceivable to do any council policy ever yet Scarlet Pimpernel feels it worth the time and effort to follow TSL on Twitter and re-post her thoughts here so he can mock her and *again* spam another unrelated thread with his policy dogma.
No wonder they block emails.
Bet no-one was surprised when the blocked email story broke. This facility has been victim of Pimpernel's constant spamming for years.
Why would the council inbox be any different?
This story is about jet planes. Big noisy jet planes flying in the sky.
VicMeldrew
says...
5:44pm Sun 21 Oct 12
Silver
says...
9:20pm Sun 21 Oct 12
It would definitely have dislodged the stuck lorry on micklegate LOL
piaggio1
says...
10:42pm Sun 21 Oct 12
piaggio&co
pontedera
italia s.p.a
Davroshasissues
says...
7:04am Mon 22 Oct 12
I was at the Blackpool airshow recently where a Typhoon was doing stunts at about 600 feet above the Irish sea, trust me, that's noisy!!!
gasheroo
says...
9:18am Mon 22 Oct 12
Mister Sheen
says...
9:29am Mon 22 Oct 12
I've got no problem whatsoever with the noise, flying low, practicing aerial ballet-dancing (couldn't really call it dogfighting unless they were in WW1 bi-planes!) - it's all dead-exciting to watch! - but could they please find a bit of airspace well away from heavily-populated ground and, in particular, not over me mam's house!! E.g. scottish highlands, north sea etc.
yorkie71
says...
11:26am Mon 22 Oct 12
6:56pm Sat 20 Oct 12
anyone spot the apache attack helicopter taking off from fulford barracks yesterday aft?”
YES its was great and low enough to see the gun details as they passed our house and followed the river south, I think I was more excited than the kids, although we are quite used to helicopters in Fulford !
deathwatch
says...
12:02pm Mon 22 Oct 12
voiceofnormalpeople wrote:Hey, don't forget: 'Mr Sheen' has "seen Top Gun FOUR times" so he's obviously an expert! Plus he can tell the speed of an aircraft by looking at it from the ground with the naked eye. He probably knows how much fuel they have and the colour of the pilot's eyes...
Mister Sheen wrote:Better go and hide under a rock then. But what if the rock is to heavy? or what if its not big enough.
Buzz Light-year wrote:Not likely! Plane wreckage might come in through the roof!
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
80 knots, took you long enough to look that up.
And i don't believe any military air craft are allowed to pratt around.
ps Did you have a set of points in the sky to judge the speed the aircraft flew between them? and to think all the special equiptment needed to be able to tell the speed an air craft is flying... maybe you could offer your services and save them millions in wasted technology.
Jeez, people are suddenly experts and have nothing else to whine about. I wonder if they wrote to Hitler in WWII to complain about the racket and the 'vibrations' making them 'spill their tea', during the bombing raids? Pathetic bunch of NIMBY's! Enjoy the free show you whinging old dicks!!!
Mister Sheen
says...
12:35pm Mon 22 Oct 12
deathwatch wrote:I was being 'ironic'. I'm not old, nor called Richard, either.
voiceofnormalpeople wrote:Hey, don't forget: 'Mr Sheen' has "seen Top Gun FOUR times" so he's obviously an expert! Plus he can tell the speed of an aircraft by looking at it from the ground with the naked eye. He probably knows how much fuel they have and the colour of the pilot's eyes...
Mister Sheen wrote:Better go and hide under a rock then. But what if the rock is to heavy? or what if its not big enough.
Buzz Light-year wrote:Not likely! Plane wreckage might come in through the roof!
They were very loud but it was worth it because for once we got to see them.
Quite a sight.
All this whining about "what if something happened" is tedious and stupid.
What if the number 4 bus misses a turn and ploughs into your house?
What if the train derails?
What if the minster falls down?
What if the barista accidentally puts liquid nitrogen into your latte?
What if Jim'll is still alive?
What if Brad Bell wins the lottery while in jail and buy Heroin Foods and opens a street drinkers palace there?
For those people who are worried - stay indoors, switch on the TV and await further instruction. Do nothing else in the meantime.
80 knots, took you long enough to look that up.
And i don't believe any military air craft are allowed to pratt around.
ps Did you have a set of points in the sky to judge the speed the aircraft flew between them? and to think all the special equiptment needed to be able to tell the speed an air craft is flying... maybe you could offer your services and save them millions in wasted technology.
Jeez, people are suddenly experts and have nothing else to whine about. I wonder if they wrote to Hitler in WWII to complain about the racket and the 'vibrations' making them 'spill their tea', during the bombing raids? Pathetic bunch of NIMBY's! Enjoy the free show you whinging old dicks!!!
Coriolanus
says...
12:51pm Mon 22 Oct 12
Lotus Eater
says...
4:35pm Mon 22 Oct 12
Davroshasissues wrote:Your colleague was not far off in that he was only one F-number off, but an F-16 is really quite a different beast from an F-15. They're much smaller, have only one engine and make far less noise. The F-15 is clearly distinguished by its twin engines, twin tailfins and huge wings.
I saw these perfectly clearly whilst on a break at work, my colleague thought they were F16's, so not far off. It was amazing to see such piloting skills, and if i'm honest, I was a little jealous that i wasn't up there...
I was at the Blackpool airshow recently where a Typhoon was doing stunts at about 600 feet above the Irish sea, trust me, that's noisy!!!
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. I've seen F-15s quite a few times over York in the last 2-3 years and it's always pretty awe-inspiring.
However, that RAF spokesman was clearly talking out of his rear-end. That pic clearly shows they were using afterburners.
the_boy_03
says...
2:02am Tue 23 Oct 12
They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines.
If anyone has ever seen the afterburners kick in on an F15 or a Tornado etc then the "flames" from the jets are about 10 feet behind it in a solid glow.
I would imagine that the RAF would know their height better than someone stood on the ground looking up trying to judge the height of the cloud.
They would be tracked on radar and would be talking to a ground controller as it is controlled airspace.
It's not the first time it's happened IIRC it was in the afternon last time they flew round the city.
There's probably a nice picture of an F 15 over York haging on someones wall now.
Perhaps next time they can phone ahead so we can make sure all hot beverages are placed safely down in the interests of H & S.
Mister Sheen
says...
10:32am Tue 23 Oct 12
Do F-15's have a reverse gear?!
Lotus Eater
says...
11:58am Tue 23 Oct 12
the_boy_03 wrote:"They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
looking at the photo I would suggest the RAF spokesman was correct.
They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines.
If anyone has ever seen the afterburners kick in on an F15 or a Tornado etc then the "flames" from the jets are about 10 feet behind it in a solid glow.
I would imagine that the RAF would know their height better than someone stood on the ground looking up trying to judge the height of the cloud.
They would be tracked on radar and would be talking to a ground controller as it is controlled airspace.
It's not the first time it's happened IIRC it was in the afternon last time they flew round the city.
There's probably a nice picture of an F 15 over York haging on someones wall now.
Perhaps next time they can phone ahead so we can make sure all hot beverages are placed safely down in the interests of H & S.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines."
No. Just, no.
In the first picture (the one with the single aircraft), the aircraft is flying away from the camera. They are afterburners.
akuma
says...
12:58pm Wed 24 Oct 12
As to the comment about the afterburners, you shouldn't mistake the jets coming from the engines as the plane beating at afterburner power.
Those flames can be visible only 80% power, and especially if they are flying low in thick oxygen.
Were the planes at full afterburner that low the trailing jets would be significantly larger.
mg1974
says...
4:59pm Wed 24 Oct 12
Lotus Eater wrote:Given that in the first picture the nose is closest to the camera and the twin tails furthest away, behind the wings then it cannot be flying away from the camera... No, just no!
the_boy_03 wrote:"They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
looking at the photo I would suggest the RAF spokesman was correct.
They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines.
If anyone has ever seen the afterburners kick in on an F15 or a Tornado etc then the "flames" from the jets are about 10 feet behind it in a solid glow.
I would imagine that the RAF would know their height better than someone stood on the ground looking up trying to judge the height of the cloud.
They would be tracked on radar and would be talking to a ground controller as it is controlled airspace.
It's not the first time it's happened IIRC it was in the afternon last time they flew round the city.
There's probably a nice picture of an F 15 over York haging on someones wall now.
Perhaps next time they can phone ahead so we can make sure all hot beverages are placed safely down in the interests of H & S.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines."
No. Just, no.
In the first picture (the one with the single aircraft), the aircraft is flying away from the camera. They are afterburners.
Buzz Light-year
says...
6:20pm Wed 24 Oct 12
It's easy to see the plane both coming toward and going away from the camera.
Guess the jury is out on that one.
modokojoco
says...
7:00pm Wed 24 Oct 12
Coriolanus wrote:Photos are not montages. Taken with Lumix FZ150 burst mode....and I did want to be a fighter pilot!
Tremendous pieces of kit. Surely the second photo is a montage or the photographer's reactions are so good he ought to be a fighter pilot. Congrats if its the real thing. Is it?
Have some others if people are interested
Jimbo of York
says...
7:01pm Wed 24 Oct 12
mg1974 wrote:The first photo clearly shows the F-15 going AWAY from the camera in a shallow climb, approximately 30-35 degrees nose up. As such the throttles would need to be increased, however it is not using afterburners as there would be two very bright cones of flame behind it.
Lotus Eater wrote:Given that in the first picture the nose is closest to the camera and the twin tails furthest away, behind the wings then it cannot be flying away from the camera... No, just no!
the_boy_03 wrote:"They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
looking at the photo I would suggest the RAF spokesman was correct.
They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines.
If anyone has ever seen the afterburners kick in on an F15 or a Tornado etc then the "flames" from the jets are about 10 feet behind it in a solid glow.
I would imagine that the RAF would know their height better than someone stood on the ground looking up trying to judge the height of the cloud.
They would be tracked on radar and would be talking to a ground controller as it is controlled airspace.
It's not the first time it's happened IIRC it was in the afternon last time they flew round the city.
There's probably a nice picture of an F 15 over York haging on someones wall now.
Perhaps next time they can phone ahead so we can make sure all hot beverages are placed safely down in the interests of H & S.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines."
No. Just, no.
In the first picture (the one with the single aircraft), the aircraft is flying away from the camera. They are afterburners.
Anyone who thinks this is coming towards the camera clearly needs to visit Spec Savers (other opticians are available.)
I used to live near Stockton on the Forest and they used to come over that part of York regularly, brilliant sight and sound.
Lotus Eater
says...
5:07pm Thu 25 Oct 12
mg1974 wrote:Yes, just yes!
Lotus Eater wrote:Given that in the first picture the nose is closest to the camera and the twin tails furthest away, behind the wings then it cannot be flying away from the camera... No, just no!
the_boy_03 wrote:"They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
looking at the photo I would suggest the RAF spokesman was correct.
They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines.
If anyone has ever seen the afterburners kick in on an F15 or a Tornado etc then the "flames" from the jets are about 10 feet behind it in a solid glow.
I would imagine that the RAF would know their height better than someone stood on the ground looking up trying to judge the height of the cloud.
They would be tracked on radar and would be talking to a ground controller as it is controlled airspace.
It's not the first time it's happened IIRC it was in the afternon last time they flew round the city.
There's probably a nice picture of an F 15 over York haging on someones wall now.
Perhaps next time they can phone ahead so we can make sure all hot beverages are placed safely down in the interests of H & S.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines."
No. Just, no.
In the first picture (the one with the single aircraft), the aircraft is flying away from the camera. They are afterburners.
I can see why you might think that the nose is closest - the brain is easily tricked - but if it was facing the way you said it is, then you wouldn't see the glow from the engines, and the auxilliary wing mounted fuel tank would not appear to be mounted above the wing.
Really, you need to take a closer look.
modokojoco
says...
11:51am Fri 26 Oct 12
Lotus Eater wrote:have just sent additional photos in. Sun was coming from the left in the picture sent. Picture 3 shows sun glistening on the canopy therefore imho the plane is flying away from the camera
mg1974 wrote:Yes, just yes!
Lotus Eater wrote:Given that in the first picture the nose is closest to the camera and the twin tails furthest away, behind the wings then it cannot be flying away from the camera... No, just no!
the_boy_03 wrote:"They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
looking at the photo I would suggest the RAF spokesman was correct.
They look like anti collision lights to me on the side of the aircraft.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines.
If anyone has ever seen the afterburners kick in on an F15 or a Tornado etc then the "flames" from the jets are about 10 feet behind it in a solid glow.
I would imagine that the RAF would know their height better than someone stood on the ground looking up trying to judge the height of the cloud.
They would be tracked on radar and would be talking to a ground controller as it is controlled airspace.
It's not the first time it's happened IIRC it was in the afternon last time they flew round the city.
There's probably a nice picture of an F 15 over York haging on someones wall now.
Perhaps next time they can phone ahead so we can make sure all hot beverages are placed safely down in the interests of H & S.
The aircraft is flying towards the camera so you are unable to see the engines."
No. Just, no.
In the first picture (the one with the single aircraft), the aircraft is flying away from the camera. They are afterburners.
I can see why you might think that the nose is closest - the brain is easily tricked - but if it was facing the way you said it is, then you wouldn't see the glow from the engines, and the auxilliary wing mounted fuel tank would not appear to be mounted above the wing.
Really, you need to take a closer look.
Dennis.Dart says...
8:35am Sat 20 Oct 12
and RAF Leeming the odd use at Church fenton, after all these chaps are training for their jobs how eles would you expect a fighter pilot to train, stop moaning and admire them
#support our troops