Bid to cut amount of affordable housing in Terry’s scheme

The former Terry’s factory The former Terry’s factory

THE owners of the former Terry’s chocolate factory site in York have made a bid to cut the amount of affordable housing to be included in its redevelopment.

The Bishopthorpe Road landmark was earmarked for a £185 million transformation including hundreds of homes, hotels, shops, bars and restaurants, but the firm behind the project put the site up for sale earlier this year after the proposals stalled.

GHT Developments LLP has now applied to City of York Council for permission to reduce the affordable housing levels within the scheme from 30.3 per cent – the amount required under an agreement known as a “Section 106” when planning approval was granted in 2010 – to 25 per cent.

This would mean 68 of its 271 properties being low-cost, rather than the initial 82. York-based Grantside, which is part of GHT Developments, bought the former factory for £26 million in 2006, but 27 of the site’s 33 acres were put on the market in March.

Although property firm Savills, which is handling the sale, has said there has been interest from potential buyers from throughout the UK, no deal has yet been struck.

The Terry’s redevelopment is expected to create more than 2,700 jobs, with Grantside’s original planning application being controversially turned down by the council in 2008 before a revised scheme was approved 18 months later.

GHT’s request for less affordable housing will go before the authority’s planning committee next Thursday.

“We are being flexible with the Section 106 requirements on this and other sites, recognising the changed economic position and site value since the original planning permission,” said Coun Dave Merrett, cabinet member for transport, planning and sustainability.

“It’s important for York’s economy, the construction industry, local building workers and suppliers and for those in housing need, to bring sites forward for development as soon as possible.

‘‘However, the decision itself is that of the planning committee, which will take the whole of the application into account in reaching its decision.”

A report by officials on GHT’s application said it was “reasonable” and has recommended lowering the affordable housing levels for the site, saying 25 per cent was in line with the council’s targets for developments on brownfield land.

Comments(12)

meme says...
9:04am Fri 19 Oct 12

I cannot see a 25% target being achieved and still making a profit
The origianl owners have lost a fortune/York has gained nothing and a site rots all thanks to our pathetic york planning system

pedalling paul says...
9:08am Fri 19 Oct 12

Of course we don't currently have an LDF in place to help resist watering down of proposals.....

Could someone with greater wisdom than myself tell us to what extent York's Planning rules reflect national legislation.

pedalling paul says...
9:09am Fri 19 Oct 12

Of course we don't currently have an LDF in place to help resist watering down of proposals.....

Could someone with greater wisdom than myself tell us to what extent York's Planning rules reflect national legislation.

capt spaulding says...
10:15am Fri 19 Oct 12

Someone with greater wisdom than Peddling Paul step forward.

capt spaulding says...
12:01pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Try not to get killed in the rush

meme says...
12:59pm Fri 19 Oct 12

I am suprised they are going for 25% as central Governemnt now recognise affordable is not affordable to developers andf I suspect they would get away with 5/10% at appeal. But perhaps that's the target anyway? York need to wake up and realise their policies are in total disarray and they are going to be shot down in flames v soon
York should take this offer with open arms or get even less when its appealled

Scarlet Pimpernel says...
1:05pm Fri 19 Oct 12

pedalling paul wrote:
Of course we don't currently have an LDF in place to help resist watering down of proposals..... Could someone with greater wisdom than myself tell us to what extent York's Planning rules reflect national legislation.
The problem with York Council is it's application of the rules/guidelines to it's policies.

For example, on affordable housing. When the last government allowed councils to set their own AH targets, they did say that the targets should be based on need and on what is deliverable (viable). Leeds and York had the same need at 40%, and before it became the councils discretion to set the AH target, both Leeds and York had a 25% target. After the rule change, Leeds retained their's at 25%, whilst York doubled their's to 50%. No prizes for guessing who's housing numbers went into decline (in 2005) ? They still are in decline now whilst in most places they have stabilised.

This is how York Council killed housebuilding in York, and the only way to get things moving in a meaningful way is to slash the current 25% and 35% targets to 10%. Without this stimuli, York will not hit it's targets by a long chalk.

Scarlet Pimpernel says...
1:11pm Fri 19 Oct 12

BTW, Leeds city centre now has a target of 5%, and its urban 'inner' areas have a 15% target. I understand that there are schemes underway in their city centre as a result of the 5% target.

York Council take note !

pedalling paul says...
1:44pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Ho ho ho...two rose to the bait, and one gave a sensible response. Thank you Scarlet Pimpernel.

eurosteve says...
8:36pm Fri 19 Oct 12

affordable housing ruins these developments and should be totally removed , why would anybody pay top money for a property like this knowing that the one next door will be sold or rented to some total undesirable as is the case at the place opposite Tesco on Tad rd where there are travellers living and their horrible kids out up to no good until all hours.
Affordable housing should be built in the type of area that these people belong in and certainly not in locations like this.

bob the builder says...
9:12pm Fri 19 Oct 12

eurosteve wrote:
affordable housing ruins these developments and should be totally removed , why would anybody pay top money for a property like this knowing that the one next door will be sold or rented to some total undesirable as is the case at the place opposite Tesco on Tad rd where there are travellers living and their horrible kids out up to no good until all hours.
Affordable housing should be built in the type of area that these people belong in and certainly not in locations like this.
As far as I'm concerned if keeping the higher percentage of affordable housing stops developers building in York that is a positive thing, slowing the increase in traffic, overcrowding in schools, waiting for doctors and dentists. If you want social housing, central government should start to pay and build purpose built estates, with medical, educational and police facilities on them. Don't make our homes lose value and become no-go areas by mixing in social housing on the cheap.

piaggio1 says...
11:28pm Fri 19 Oct 12

as is the case at the place opposite Tesco on Tad rd where there are travellers living and their horrible kids out up to no good until all hours.

strange that>often wondered how the hell some up there can afford a brand new house on a once nice site,when i say nice i mean for where it is ???

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree