Petition blow in Allerton Park incinerator fight

A 10,000-NAME petition opposing a £1.4 billion waste incinerator between York and Harrogate will not be considered when the plans go under the spotlight later this month.

The proposals for the Allerton Waste Recovery Park, next to the A1(M), will be debated by North Yorkshire County Council’s planning committee on October 30 and have been recommended for approval by planners.

The plant at Allerton Park Quarry would be operated by AmeyCespa through a 25-year contract with the county council and City of York Council, who say it would slash their waste bills and landfill tax payments. It would deal with up to 320,000 tonnes of rubbish a year and be able to heat more than 40,000 homes.

But opponents say the scheme is outdated, too expensive and will harm the environment and hit recycling rates. A report by Vicky Perkin, the county council’s head of planning services, has now said the authority cannot give “any weight” to a petition containing 10,000 signatures calling for the proposals to be blocked when they go before the committee, because it was handed in before the planning application was submitted.

The report said although it is “inevitable” the plant – whose chimney would be 70m high – will have an impact on the surrounding countryside and does not comply with some planning policies, this did not “outweigh the need for the development” and its “public benefits”.

“This is a controversial proposal of major scale and complexity,” it said.

“There is a clear and compelling need for the delivery of new infrastructure to enable the diversion of residual waste away from landfill. The renewable and low-carbon energy which would be generated is a substantial benefit of the proposal.”

AmeyCespa would be required to carry out conservation, repair and maintenance work in nearby Allerton Park and its gardens and draw up a plan for its future protection, pay the county council £839,500 to enhance and strengthen the local landscape, and contribute £128,791 for improvements at the A59/A168 junction.

Among the objectors are a group of nine local parish councils, as well as Harrogate Borough Council, Boroughbridge and Knaresborough Town Councils, the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Friends of the Earth and North Yorkshire Waste Action Group. English Heritage, Natural England, the Environment Agency and Yorkshire Wildlife Trust are among the organisations which have not raised objections.

Comments(7)

FieryJack says...
1:02pm Thu 18 Oct 12

desperate stuff. These are supposed to be public servants

goodfellow says...
1:08pm Thu 18 Oct 12

They are public servants doing their job in a fair, dispassionate and professional manner. Just because you don’t like the recommendation does not make it wrong.

GeoffBeacon says...
1:09pm Thu 18 Oct 12

“There is a clear and compelling need for the delivery of new infrastructure to enable the diversion of residual waste away from landfill."

Landfill tax is the reason we are asked to "recycle" bottles. Bottles are heavy and add considerably to the landfill tax. Grinding them down to reform them into new bottles in furnaces doesn't save enough CO2 to justify recycling. We need returnable bottles that are reused.

"The renewable and low-carbon energy which would be generated is a substantial benefit of the proposal.”

I have heard that schemes such as this will be banned under European regulations because they simply throw away the heat from flue gasses after the electricity has been generated. Do I draw the conclusion that while this scheme is better than landfill, it will not be up to the standard that will be demanded by new EU law?

FossLad says...
1:48pm Thu 18 Oct 12

How ridiculous. Can't they just pass the petition back, and then give it in again !!!

greenmonkey says...
4:21pm Thu 18 Oct 12

Do I draw the conclusion that while this scheme is better than landfill, it will not be up to the standard that will be demanded by new EU law?
That is what happened to the Sheffield incinerator in the early 90's - failed the new lower emissions limits £1m spent to upgrade still wasnt enough, shut down for 2 years while they built another one at cost of over £30m, funded by the whole collection service being handed over to a contract with Biffa. Result is they had paper recycling collection once a month, only recently got any other recyclates collected on the doorstep.

greenmonkey says...
4:25pm Thu 18 Oct 12

"It would deal with up to 320,000 tonnes of rubbish a year and be able to heat more than 40,000 homes" - er except there are only one or two very large homes nearby to heat. Most homes burn the gas to heat them rather than using electricity which will be generated by this plant.

FieryJack says...
8:01am Fri 19 Oct 12

How is it fair to disregard the wishes of so many voters just like that? There has been almost minimal consultation from the start, while NYCC and York have spent taxpayers' money strapping themselves to a deal that means they will lose money and face if it falls through, despite the weight of opposition and the power of arguments against. AmeyCespa have played them

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree