Support urged for anti-cuts campaign

YORK’S councillors are to be asked to give cross-party support to a city-led campaign demanding the Government halts “destructive” funding cuts for local authorities.

City of York Council leader James Alexander said “disproportionate” reductions in local authority funding from Westminster were harming vulnerable people.

He also claimed local government was being hit harder than other areas of the public sector.

Coun Alexander will table a motion at a council meeting tomorrow night asking opposition parties to join Labour in an “enough is enough” campaign, calling on the Government to reassess council funding.

He blamed “deficit panic” for councils being forced to make savings which outstripped those forced on other public services. He said any campaign would be “non-partisan” and parties who did not sign up would be guilty of shedding “crocodile tears” over cuts.

He said: “Parties must come together and say enough is enough. We have identified £41 million of savings since the last General Election and future savings will be required each year well into the next spending review period. Residents are unhappy at the way these cuts are hitting council services, and rightly so.

“We understand local government has to take its share of the pain, but we are doing far more than other areas of the public services. In 2015, there will be a 0.6 per cent reduction in public expenditure, yet for local government it will be 5.6 per cent. We invite other parties to join us so York can lead on a national campaign.”

• YORK looks likely to avoid the need for a referendum on its council tax rise for next year.

As reported by The Press, City of York Council leader James Alexander said the authority had budgeted for a two per cent rise in bills in 2013/14, despite the Government confirming it would set aside £450 million to help councils freeze levels.

Coun Alexander said not increasing tax bills would mean further cuts and affect services.

The Government’s plans mean any local authority which wants to raise council tax by more than two per cent will have to hold a referendum, giving residents the chance to veto it – but York’s plans would not make this necessary.

Coun Chris Steward, corporate services spokesman for the Conservative opposition group, said the Government offer rewarded councils which were “spending prudently and looking to make savings”.

Comments(11)

CHISSY1 says...
1:34pm Wed 10 Oct 12

"Overseas aid at the moment is approx £8.1 billion rising to £11.4 billion by 2014,might as well give them the £41 million that has been identified."

asd says...
1:52pm Wed 10 Oct 12

A revolution of sorts is needed in this country. Every major party supports the bankers, the so called city men who gamble, the obsession with index linking everything except tax and vat. They except DONATIONS from these societys, organsisations and companys for political gains. Its all currupt and who pay for these mistakes by these cretins? US, the little worker bee's supplying them with necture so they can get their rewards.

Elephant says...
3:19pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Proof that marxists can't spell.

CHISSY1 says...
3:24pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Elephant wrote:
Proof that marxists can't spell.
"Well spotted,i bet you feel better for that"

Elephant says...
3:35pm Wed 10 Oct 12

I do apologise. I should have gone after the absence of any form of valid argument in asd's post ... just the usual irrelevant banker bashing nonsense.

Elephant says...
3:55pm Wed 10 Oct 12

No doubt the populist claptrap will propel Mr Alexander into Westminster. Sadly the UK is still living well above its means and public spending has to adjust to what we can afford - most rational people realise that but don't have to take responsibility for balancing the books. That said, never let facts and reality stand in the way of a cushy job in Government.

powerwatt says...
4:33pm Wed 10 Oct 12

So why in that case is Alexander cutting more than the Government has said to and then borrowing even more to spend on his personal slush fund.

Maybe there would be more cross party support to stop Alexander having a say in anything.

Even AndyD says...
6:17pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Elephant wrote:
No doubt the populist claptrap will propel Mr Alexander into Westminster. Sadly the UK is still living well above its means and public spending has to adjust to what we can afford - most rational people realise that but don't have to take responsibility for balancing the books. That said, never let facts and reality stand in the way of a cushy job in Government.
The two views are not mutually exclusive. The books do need to be balanced and that includes controls on spending, but the financial services sector also needs to be more aggressively regulated. For years pensions and savings plans were regulated to within an inch of their lives, but lending was allowed to go unchecked. You could borrow £25,000 over the telephone!
Feel free to find flaws in my spelling.

Gary Gilmores Eyes says...
11:50am Thu 11 Oct 12

‘Coun Alexander said not increasing tax bills would mean further cuts and affect services.’

There is the threat!

However it also means that York City Council under the so called leadership of baby James Alexander can also waste further large amounts of council taxpayer’s money of poorly judged schemes and on consultant’s fees for abandoned projects.

The inevitable is on its way for York council taxpayers… A council tax rise in April irrespective of government advice!

I think James Alexander should resign over this.

Some commenters on here have just knocked ‘asd’ and called him a Marxist because he has stated that this country requires some form of revolution, it is they that are deluded.

It is already on the way and quicker than most people realize. When it does arrive in whatever form it is going to make the London riots look like a picnic.

We live in a country that lives unsustainably/on the verge of going bust/ extended fuel and food supplies and far too many as a population.

The funniest part is that most people think that the powers at be will sort it out and protect them….. No chance, look at what happened after/during the London riots – slow response, too little/too late.
The hurricane Katrina disaster shows also how ordinary people suffered as the state did not look after them.

The Swiss are now making full preparations in their armed forces for mass public uprisings/bad behavior from within the EU member states spreading over their borders, as the Swiss consider that the EU is very close to a huge meltdown of currency/markets and government.

The so called powers at be in this country and others within the EU are on the edge and are ignoring the very real situation that is hovering in the background.

Food prices are going up now due to poor harvest, fuel going up again due to taxation in the early new year. Something somewhere will pop!

Elephant says...
2:06pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Even AndyD wrote:
Elephant wrote:
No doubt the populist claptrap will propel Mr Alexander into Westminster. Sadly the UK is still living well above its means and public spending has to adjust to what we can afford - most rational people realise that but don't have to take responsibility for balancing the books. That said, never let facts and reality stand in the way of a cushy job in Government.
The two views are not mutually exclusive. The books do need to be balanced and that includes controls on spending, but the financial services sector also needs to be more aggressively regulated. For years pensions and savings plans were regulated to within an inch of their lives, but lending was allowed to go unchecked. You could borrow £25,000 over the telephone!
Feel free to find flaws in my spelling.
I agree, I was one of the few to point out the emperor's clothes of Gordon Brown's "End to Boom and Bust". The Labour boom was just borrow and spend on all levels - consumer, corporate and Government. I'm not saying previous governments were much better, but do take a look at this chart and spot where Labour took over: http://goo.gl/2jVfe.


Money was cheap post Sept-11 as central banks held interest rates artificially low to avoid a recession. They did the same in 2005. Nobody wanted the party to end and only a Government could have told everyone they had enough.

Jen204 says...
10:15pm Fri 12 Oct 12

The interesting thing is that I cannot find anything in this paper about the cuts to NHS services and the fact that GP surgeries could disappear. It is in the Northern Echo.
I have set up an epetition to have an enquiry into the links between government ministers and private healthcare companies. I hope as many of you as possible will sign it.
Look at the website The Green Benches for information on this.
The link to the petition is
http://epetitions.di
rect.gov.uk/petition
s/40126

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree