Salt bins ‘could be left unfilled’ (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Salt bins in York ‘could be left unfilled’
8:54am Tuesday 9th October 2012 in News
By Mark Stead, Political Reporter
Not enough cash to fill salt bins
PLANS to leave almost half of York’s salt bins empty this winter will have a “significant” impact on residents, according to councillors who are trying to force council bosses into a rethink.
City of York Council will only automatically fill 199 of the city’s 369 bins – which are used to store salt used to clear footpaths in icy weather – following a review of its winter maintenance policy, saying it does not have the money to stock the remaining 170.
These will be left in place so contingency cash can be used to fill them if the weather is severe. Parish councils have met the suggestion they could meet the salt bill themselves – following changes to the ward committee funding system - with reluctance.
Liberal Democrat councillors Keith Aspden, Nigel Ayre and Ann Reid have now called in the plans for further scrutiny, saying the money necessary to stock all 369 bins could be found from elsewhere in the council’s budget.
The issue will be discussed next week at a meeting of the authority’s corporate and scrutiny management committee, which will decide whether to stick with the original decision or refer it back to the cabinet. A report on the call-in said the Lib Dem councillors claimed: “In bad weather, this cut will have a significant and detrimental impact.
“Residents will not know which salt bins are full and which are empty until they need to use them. Leaving the bins out empty is likely to lead to a further deterioration in their condition and make it harder to bring them back into use.”
They also claimed it was “irrational” not to pay for 170 bins to be stocked before a review of their locations, due to be held next year, was completed. In a report on the revised winter maintenance policy, officials said parish councils felt asking them to pay for salt stocks would be “double taxation” and place their “already tight finances” under increased strain.
The council’s ruling Labour group has said money will be available from its highways budget to fill 199 bins, and keeping the other 170 in position meant supplies would be available, paid for through the authority’s contingency budget, if the weather warranted it.
It said a review of salt bin provision after this winter would include a public consultation exercise and would be aimed at developing a “more transparent and logical distribution of bins for those areas which most need them”.
Comments(20)
Micklegate
says...
9:07am Tue 9 Oct 12
mrcharly wrote:I don't know if you have no idea what the story i about or you are just James Alexander, or both.
Seems sensible to me. People just nick the salt for their own use; leaving the bins in place means the council can fill them if the winter is as bad as 2010/11
They are not being left due to the danger people will 'nick the salt' it is to save money and force (mainly rural) residents to pay their taxes and then have to ay again t refill their own bins.
The cost of refilling all the bins is peanuts (about 1% of the money wasted on the pulled LDF or 25% of the cost of 'free' wi-fi for the city centre), sadly this is being done by Labou for purely cynical, political reasons and they are putting lives at risk.
HPSauce
says...
9:07am Tue 9 Oct 12
"Leaving the bins out empty is likely to lead to a further deterioration in their condition and make it harder to bring them back into use."
Exactly how hard is it to "bring a bin back to use". Honestly. Good cause spoiled by dumb logic.
UsernameNotAvailable
says...
9:08am Tue 9 Oct 12
meme
says...
9:16am Tue 9 Oct 12
Why cannot in this day of the big society neighbourhoods get together and clear their own pavements?
Its not such a big deal for fitter residents to clear snow from more than their own front path
Rather than complain lets work together
Who knows it may even foster a community spirit or is that too much to ask?
Even AndyD
says...
9:21am Tue 9 Oct 12
Makes me laugh, these are the same people who would be crying 'waste of money' if the decision were the other way round. Comment on the facts not the politics. Union Terrace - now there was a shambolic of work, or the Beckfield Lne tip closure, but this just seems common sense.
Oaklands Resident
says...
9:36am Tue 9 Oct 12
Salt has got wet and is now solidified making them unusable
In periods of poor weather - remember 2 winters ago - the Council struggled to get round all the bins to replenish them. Talk of bringing the wrecked bins back into use if the winter is bad is frankly naive.
As for people clearing snow themselves. Yes to a point, but we are talking here about salt to clear ICE. These are the “self help” bins that are an essential part of that process.
If you look at which bins will be filled and which will be abandoned, you find that vast stretches of the City will have no bins while others will have many. For the sake of a few thousand pounds it is a barking mad economy.
I hope that people go to the meeting on Monday and make their views known.
…..And yes it is a higher priority than providing "free" WiFi access in the Museum Gardens (the taxpayer’s bill for which is over £30,000)
Micklegate
says...
9:44am Tue 9 Oct 12
Even AndyD wrote:'if the weather warrants it' - can you give me the criteria for that cut off? No as there are not any it's highly subjective and they expect parish councils to pay to refill them.
Hang on - they will fill the empty bins if the weather warrants it. So those of you complaining want bins full of salt for what reason, precisely? Makes me laugh, these are the same people who would be crying 'waste of money' if the decision were the other way round. Comment on the facts not the politics. Union Terrace - now there was a shambolic of work, or the Beckfield Lne tip closure, but this just seems common sense.
As for people criticising 'would be crying waste of money', this is a cut in years before they have been refilled so can you give examples of residents/Press web posters etc declaring it a waste of money? No because they haven't, it's a basic council service.
Silver
says...
9:57am Tue 9 Oct 12
Pete the Brickie
says...
10:11am Tue 9 Oct 12
Even AndyD wrote:Sorry but this council are the one making politics out of the issue, the bins would be filled with exactly the same level of funding if we had a government in power which James Alexander supported in my opinion.
Hang on - they will fill the empty bins if the weather warrants it. So those of you complaining want bins full of salt for what reason, precisely?
Makes me laugh, these are the same people who would be crying 'waste of money' if the decision were the other way round. Comment on the facts not the politics. Union Terrace - now there was a shambolic of work, or the Beckfield Lne tip closure, but this just seems common sense.
Ignatius Lumpopo
says...
10:41am Tue 9 Oct 12
Candy Cupcake
says...
10:50am Tue 9 Oct 12
perplexed
says...
11:01am Tue 9 Oct 12
Micklegate wrote:Of course, it would be great if all the salt bins were filled over the winter period. However, to equate such a move with 'putting lives at risk' appears to be a cynical political move on behalf of Micklegate rather than the other way round.
mrcharly wrote:I don't know if you have no idea what the story i about or you are just James Alexander, or both.
Seems sensible to me. People just nick the salt for their own use; leaving the bins in place means the council can fill them if the winter is as bad as 2010/11
They are not being left due to the danger people will 'nick the salt' it is to save money and force (mainly rural) residents to pay their taxes and then have to ay again t refill their own bins.
The cost of refilling all the bins is peanuts (about 1% of the money wasted on the pulled LDF or 25% of the cost of 'free' wi-fi for the city centre), sadly this is being done by Labou for purely cynical, political reasons and they are putting lives at risk.
Closing Hospital wards and restricting access to diagnostic services for the sick, would I suggest truly put lives at risk!
Even AndyD
says...
11:04am Tue 9 Oct 12
Micklegate wrote:Cut off is probably similar to those used to send gritters out. I personally don't know what they are, but I'm sure they exist.
Even AndyD wrote:'if the weather warrants it' - can you give me the criteria for that cut off? No as there are not any it's highly subjective and they expect parish councils to pay to refill them.
Hang on - they will fill the empty bins if the weather warrants it. So those of you complaining want bins full of salt for what reason, precisely? Makes me laugh, these are the same people who would be crying 'waste of money' if the decision were the other way round. Comment on the facts not the politics. Union Terrace - now there was a shambolic of work, or the Beckfield Lne tip closure, but this just seems common sense.
As for people criticising 'would be crying waste of money', this is a cut in years before they have been refilled so can you give examples of residents/Press web posters etc declaring it a waste of money? No because they haven't, it's a basic council service.
All I'm saying it too many posters on here have a political agenda, which masks their view of facts. Or put it another way, Micklegate, give me one example of a post you've made supporting a council decision in the last 12 months. Just one where you have posted. I vote Labour but think the Beckfield Lane tip and Union Terr. debacle were bad decisions (although one was reversed). I am even supportive of the AH brigade and their complaints. Like I say - its about issues, not which flag you insist on waving in the face of all evidence. This is how governments get away with so much - their hard core non-thinking supporters let them do what they want simply because the hate the 'other lot'. Political opinion isn't an off the peg coat you wear, it shouldn't bypass the brain.
tobefair
says...
11:05am Tue 9 Oct 12
Even AndyD
says...
11:08am Tue 9 Oct 12
Even AndyD
says...
11:23am Tue 9 Oct 12
Pete the Brickie wrote:Fair enough - I think they are all out to political point score. Never miss an opportunity, if they spent as much time providing services/policy as they did ensuring they are elected next time round - we'd all be in a far better state, nationally and locally.
Even AndyD wrote:Sorry but this council are the one making politics out of the issue, the bins would be filled with exactly the same level of funding if we had a government in power which James Alexander supported in my opinion.
Hang on - they will fill the empty bins if the weather warrants it. So those of you complaining want bins full of salt for what reason, precisely?
Makes me laugh, these are the same people who would be crying 'waste of money' if the decision were the other way round. Comment on the facts not the politics. Union Terrace - now there was a shambolic of work, or the Beckfield Lne tip closure, but this just seems common sense.
Micklegate
says...
11:52am Tue 9 Oct 12
Even AndyD wrote:I don't have details of posts when I have supported the council, but I didn't make the claim you did. I do support many things the council does. As for 'I'm sure they exist' on the criteria why not check? Give the council a ring and ask at what point they plan on refilling the bins? Or go on twitter and ask Kersten or James?
Micklegate wrote:Cut off is probably similar to those used to send gritters out. I personally don't know what they are, but I'm sure they exist. All I'm saying it too many posters on here have a political agenda, which masks their view of facts. Or put it another way, Micklegate, give me one example of a post you've made supporting a council decision in the last 12 months. Just one where you have posted. I vote Labour but think the Beckfield Lane tip and Union Terr. debacle were bad decisions (although one was reversed). I am even supportive of the AH brigade and their complaints. Like I say - its about issues, not which flag you insist on waving in the face of all evidence. This is how governments get away with so much - their hard core non-thinking supporters let them do what they want simply because the hate the 'other lot'. Political opinion isn't an off the peg coat you wear, it shouldn't bypass the brain.Even AndyD wrote: Hang on - they will fill the empty bins if the weather warrants it. So those of you complaining want bins full of salt for what reason, precisely? Makes me laugh, these are the same people who would be crying 'waste of money' if the decision were the other way round. Comment on the facts not the politics. Union Terrace - now there was a shambolic of work, or the Beckfield Lne tip closure, but this just seems common sense.'if the weather warrants it' - can you give me the criteria for that cut off? No as there are not any it's highly subjective and they expect parish councils to pay to refill them. As for people criticising 'would be crying waste of money', this is a cut in years before they have been refilled so can you give examples of residents/Press web posters etc declaring it a waste of money? No because they haven't, it's a basic council service.
bob the builder
says...
9:50pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Magicman!
says...
3:45am Wed 10 Oct 12
As for using the salt, as far as I understand the law it is OK to use salt from these bins to make an access route for members of the public carrying out a service such as postmen, meter readers, etc to get from the road to your door. 'Access Route' means just wide enough for somebody to walk along, not completely clearing your entire driveway. In addition to this, where footpaths are not cleared I believe every resident who is fit and able to do so should take responsibility for clearing the public footpath outside their house using salt from the bins. In years gone by I've filled up on salt and then spread it halfway down the road on the footpaths.
mrcharly says...
8:56am Tue 9 Oct 12