City of York Council’s £245k bill for Allerton Park incinerator consultation work

CONSULTANTS were paid £245,000 by council chiefs in York last year to work on plans for a controversial waste incinerator in the North Yorkshire countryside.

City of York Council footed the six-figure bill for legal and professional advice and other costs as part of its role in proposals for the £1.4 billion Allerton Waste Recovery Park, planned for a quarry site next to the A1(M) between York and Harrogate.

The project is a joint venture between the authority and North Yorkshire County Council, who say it will provide the solution to their waste problems and reduce the amounts they have to pay in landfill tax, as well as producing enough energy to power thousands of homes.

If approved by the county council, the incinerator would be operated by AmeyCespa through a 25-year-deal, which is backed by £65 million in private finance initiative funding.

The York council’s accounts for 2011/12 have shown £245,171 was spent on “professional fees” during the year, on top of the £400,940.76 paid out to consultants the year before.

Campaigners who claim the incinerator is outdated, too expensive and will damage the environment claimed public money was being wasted on the scheme, which is expected to be debated by county councillors before the end of the year.

The expenditure represents York’s share of the annual project costs, for which it was invoiced by the county council.

A spokeswoman said it related to fees for legal matters, mineral surveys, technical, procurement and planning advice, land costs and “miscellaneous” expenses, such as employee costs, travel expenses, printing and stationery.

“When North Yorkshire County Council entered into a commercial agreement for the provision of a long-term waste management service contract with AmeyCespa, City of York Council entered a joint waste management agreement with the county council,” she said.

“Under the agreement, City of York Council pays 25 per cent of costs incurred. The professional costs relate to technical advice not available within the council.”

Richard Lane, of the York Residents Against Incineration action group, said: “If the incinerator was a sane and sustainable solution, it would be worth the money, but given that this is obsolete technology, it cannot be justified.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg and costs will keep going up and up. No alternatives have ever been costed, and this expenditure is unjustifiable in this economic climate.”

Comments(6)

monkeyhanger says...
9:57am Mon 8 Oct 12

245k,that could have payed for some salt to fill salt bins.

long distance depressive says...
10:35am Mon 8 Oct 12

Consultancy work eh!? what exactly does all that money do? Whenever there is a project there is a huge consultancy fee involved, it drags on (presumably costing more in consultancy fees) and doesn't necessarily offer the best outcome anyway.

R'Marcus says...
3:26pm Mon 8 Oct 12

Well done, York Council!
You have wasted OUR money, yet again.
Soon you will asking us to believe that the council budget empty, and want us to top up the budget!
Get real.

NOXIOUS-SMOKESTACK says...
3:32pm Mon 8 Oct 12

FEE – MERCHANTS ! Deep into the York City Taxpayer's Money Trough .... Once more …. A Whopping £245,000.00 of FEES on top of the previous Whopping £400,000.00 Consultancy FEE Bill, on top of the Colossal £5.4 Million, in FEES paid out by NYCC (on behalf of the unsuspecting Taxpayers of North Yorkshire). And not a brick laid, on this White Elephant. NYCC & YCC Bureaucrats & Politician’s really know how to Blow Taxpayer's money.

York1900 says...
6:42am Tue 9 Oct 12

What gets me is they all ways want to build these things were they can not be used to there full effect if they are going to build a incinerator it should be built some were all the energy can be recovered by generating electricity and a district heating system this would give a full return on the plant


.

FieryJack says...
8:06am Tue 9 Oct 12

That would mean in their own backyard York - York council have got a zero incineration policy, yet are happy to vote to stick one elsewhere. Nice!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree