'Safety-compliant' netting fitted at Yearsley Pool (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
'Safety-compliant' netting fitted at Yearsley Pool
9:23am Wednesday 3rd October 2012 in News
By Mike Laycock, Chief reporter
York’s Yearsley Pool
NETTING has been put up on the balcony at an historic York swimming pool after fears were raised that a child might climb through railings.
The temporary, “safety-compliant” netting has been used at Yearsley Pool to make the balcony area useable, said Simon Luck, City of York Council’s site manager at the pool.
He said the safety of all pool users was of paramount importance. “Immediately after a customer reported that their child had tried to climb through the balcony railings, we arranged a health and safety audit, temporarily closed the balconies and installed the temporary, fire-resistant and safety-compliant netting to make the area useable,” he said.
“The balcony areas are important spaces and we are assessing and costing permanent safety solutions which are also in keeping with this Edwardian facility.”
The netting was drawn to the attention of The Press by reader Liz Wilson, of The Village, Osbaldwick, who said she had been surprised by what she had seen on visiting the pool on Monday with some friends.
“My friends and I were surprised to see the whole of the balcony festooned in white mesh fastened to the rails with black ties,” she said.
“No, it wasn’t a special occasion. A lady had complained that her toddler was in danger of putting her head through the 145mm space between the rails.
“Health and safety had to be called in and, at a cost of more than £700, the mesh was put all round the rails.
“Surely in these days of cutbacks, this was a desperate step to take. Would a large notice not have sufficed? This Edwardian swimming pool was built in 1908, and I wonder just how many heads have had to be extricated from the rails in more than 100 years.”
Comments(7)
AngryandFrustrated
says...
9:50am Wed 3 Oct 12
TONY THE TORCHE wrote:LOL!!
Better drain the water in case someone drowns.
To be fair to the Council, I feel sorry for them in these circumstances and I do feel that Ms Wilson is being unfair and overly critical of them on this occasion. A parent had clearly complained/drawn to the attention of the Council that her child had tried to get thru' the railings. Qhite frankly, my view is that said parent should not be allowing her child to do such a thing and should accept responsibility for her childs actions.
Alas, society no longer takes that view and is always looking for someone or something to blame for an unfortunate event. Had the Council not taken the action they had, and a child had got thru' the railings, or had seriously injured him/her self, then the papers would be full of "the Council were warned that this could happen and did nothing". In those circumstances, it would cost us taxpayers a lot more than £700 to resolve the issue.
Pete the Brickie
says...
9:56am Wed 3 Oct 12
Simon Luck, City of York Council’s site manager at the pool said.
The safety of all pool users was of paramount importance. “Immediately after a customer reported that their child had tried to climb through the balcony railings, we arranged a health and safety audit, temporarily closed the balconies and installed the temporary, fire-resistant and safety-compliant netting to make the area useable,” he said.
I'm all for Health and Safety but let's face it this area has been perfectly "usable" since the pool was constructed in 1908. Yes a child "might" manage to fit through the gap, but you have to consider the likelyhood of them doing so, the fact none have since six years prior to world war one would put my mind at rest to be honest. Some of my builders are able to fit through the maximum permitable gap between guardrails on modern scaffolds, luckily the same sense of self preservation found in toddlers allows them to make the judgement not to do so and prevents them falling to the ground below.
Neither do said construction employees have the additional safeguard of being watched closely by their mother, this should remain as effective a control measure as it seems to have been since King Edward VII reigned and a plastic sign asking all children to be closely supervised would cover the council.
Smiler
says...
6:04pm Wed 3 Oct 12
It's H&S gone mad.......
another easier way to have dealt with it would be to ban anyone not able to supervise their children from using the pool.
Magicman!
says...
11:59pm Wed 3 Oct 12
paintitred
says...
11:40am Thu 4 Oct 12
untill some child manages to escape a parents attention and gets through through the railings and falls to the concrete floor below. A expensive fine and claim follows. Then we will get people posting "where was the fencing to stop that happening" and more tax payers money gone blar blar blar
Guido_Fawkes
says...
9:33pm Fri 5 Oct 12
I'm at Yearsley Pool regularly and I'm always seeing parents with small children who they're supposed to be looking after, arsing about on ipads/laptops/mobile
d oblivious to what their little darlings are up to, and with no consideration of others
TONY THE TORCHE says...
9:32am Wed 3 Oct 12