1,500 call on City of York Council to ‘bring back bins’

Linda Maggs and Lita Black with their petition  opposing the removal of rubbish bins in Dunnington Linda Maggs and Lita Black with their petition opposing the removal of rubbish bins in Dunnington

MORE than 1,500 people have signed two petitions calling for the return of York litter bins which were controversially taken away to cut costs.

In June City of York Council removed 349 bins – more than a third of the city’s total number – to save the authority £40,000 a year on collection rounds, although some have since been replaced.

However, calls for even more to be replaced have continued and a petition set up by Liberal Democrat campaigners in the Huntington and New Earswick ward, where 25 bins were removed, now has more than 1,000 signatures.

The Lib Dems say a more far-reaching rethink of the ruling Labour group’s decision is needed.

Resident Chris Twells, who helped organise the petition, said: “The response has been overwhelming - residents are angry the bins were removed without warning or consultation and are worried litter and dog mess in the area is increasing as a result.”

Lib Dem group leader Coun Carol Runciman , who represents Huntington and New Earswick, said: “While it is good that some bins have been returned, the council needs to go further.

“Bins should be returned where there is a demand to do so and where an increase in litter has been reported. I hope this petition will encourage Labour to get out of their Guildhall bubble and start listening to ordinary residents.”

Meanwhile, more than 500 people have signed a petition calling for several bins in Dunnington to be returned, with residents saying they are needed to maintain the village’s image after its recent gold award in the Yorkshire in Bloom competition.

Dunnington resident Linda Maggs, who has been involved in setting up the petition, said: “We do our best to help ourselves and work very hard to keep the village in fine condition, so we feel the least the council can do is replace three bins which are very well-used and support us in our endeavours.”

Coun David Levene, cabinet member for environmental services, said bins had been replaced where there were problems, such as near bus stops and schools.

But he said: “Tough choices are required and savings have to be made.

“We will be responsive where there is evidence of the need for bins and where very limited resources allow, but the Liberal Democrats could be more constructive in encouraging the responsible disposal of litter and dog waste.”

Comments(12)

iamspartacus says...
11:04am Thu 27 Sep 12

I want to know what the question was on the petition.

E.g. "Do you want your bins back?" would be too vague a petition question. Of course people would sign that petition.

Better to say: "The Government has reduced funding to local governments. As a result, City of York Council have had to make savings across the city. If you had a choice of prioritising services for the vulnerable or the number of bins, would you prioritise bins?"

LibDem says...
11:39am Thu 27 Sep 12

......or perhaps ask residents if they would rather sustain basic public services like litter bins, filling salt bins in winter etc or alternatively whether they would spend the money on buying new pantomime constumes, increasing Councillors pay, expanding "free" WiFi access and all the other projects that Labour are currently wasting money on in York.

magic cat says...
2:21pm Thu 27 Sep 12

Really cannot understand this Labour council - not content with taking away litter bins and doing away with barrowmen, they are now leaving unfilled salt bins out on the streets which will become just more litter bins which will not be emptied. A real kick in the teeth for those residents who like to keep their neighbourhood clean and tidy. I am afraid that blaming this on the government cuts is wearing a bith thin now!

PKH says...
2:40pm Thu 27 Sep 12

I hope the petition for Huntington and New Earswick is not the so called LibDem questionnaire, where the question on the bins only had one tick box, to ensure the answer the LibDems wanted.

jorvik says...
2:54pm Thu 27 Sep 12

LibDem wrote:
......or perhaps ask residents if they would rather sustain basic public services like litter bins, filling salt bins in winter etc or alternatively whether they would spend the money on buying new pantomime constumes, increasing Councillors pay, expanding "free" WiFi access and all the other projects that Labour are currently wasting money on in York.
You missed the waste of money spent on making South Bank a 20 mph zone or the money wasted by Red Sonja Crisp on her own personal quest to bring so called asylum seekers to York even though there's not enough housing for local people

iamspartacus says...
2:56pm Thu 27 Sep 12

PKH - it wouldn't surprise me. The last Lib Dems 'Focus' leaflet I received was rather selective in its content and seemed to forget anything that happened before May 2011!

Ichabod76 says...
4:20pm Thu 27 Sep 12

PKH wrote:
I hope the petition for Huntington and New Earswick is not the so called LibDem questionnaire, where the question on the bins only had one tick box, to ensure the answer the LibDems wanted.
not so sure you know the difference between a petition and a questionnaire !

Even AndyD says...
7:59pm Thu 27 Sep 12

Double standards by some on here is breathtaking. In relation to the 20mph zones, we can apparently be 'educated not to have accidents'. But with litter, we have no clue how to take our sweetie wrappers home with us, we need bins on every corner.

Sometimes you just have to smile. :-)

PKH says...
10:04pm Thu 27 Sep 12

Ichabod76 wrote:
PKH wrote:
I hope the petition for Huntington and New Earswick is not the so called LibDem questionnaire, where the question on the bins only had one tick box, to ensure the answer the LibDems wanted.
not so sure you know the difference between a petition and a questionnaire !
I know the difference, however the 'questionnaire' even though it was delivered with your name and address on it requested you to put your name and address on it, why? rather fishy I think.

PKH says...
10:06pm Thu 27 Sep 12

Even AndyD wrote:
Double standards by some on here is breathtaking. In relation to the 20mph zones, we can apparently be 'educated not to have accidents'. But with litter, we have no clue how to take our sweetie wrappers home with us, we need bins on every corner.

Sometimes you just have to smile. :-)
Have to agree with you.

Silver says...
10:27pm Thu 27 Sep 12

PKH wrote:
Even AndyD wrote:
Double standards by some on here is breathtaking. In relation to the 20mph zones, we can apparently be 'educated not to have accidents'. But with litter, we have no clue how to take our sweetie wrappers home with us, we need bins on every corner.

Sometimes you just have to smile. :-)
Have to agree with you.
Curses I can see a 20 mph sign but not a bin....yet I passed my driving test....

Magicman! says...
2:33am Fri 28 Sep 12

I don't understand how removing some bins but not all in an area saves money. The bins are already there, so no money needed to buy the things... and to empty the bins you need a council bloke in a transit with a cage on the back. If dunnington had 8 bins, for example, this bloke in the transit drives round each bin and empties the metal containers inside (no bin bags) - if dunnington then has the bins reduced to 3 that bloke in the transit still has to drive out to dunnington and empty the bins that are there - and so money is still spent on wages and fuel.

The only possible way I can think that it saves money is because it forces people to take litter elsewhere and so the council has less waste to send to landfill and less tax from our evil overlords in the EU who bought into the whole American-led "let's make up some global catastrophe in the making that us americans have the answer to, the answer somehow involving more taxes" spin-story.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree