Community stadium consultants cost £420k

Outside consultants have been paid more than £420,000 over three years for work they have carried out on the planned new stadium for York Outside consultants have been paid more than £420,000 over three years for work they have carried out on the planned new stadium for York

THE BILL for consultants and legal firms working on York’s community stadium project has topped £420,000 in three years.

External firms were paid £146,377 of public money as the project to build a 6,000-seat home for York City FC and York City Knights at Monks Cross took shape, according to figures obtained by The Press from City of York Council ’s annual accounts.

It followed the £132,322 sanctioned by the authority for outside consultancy and legal guidance in 2009/10 and the £145,000 spent the following year.

The council said the complexity of the project, which it is hoped will see the new ground ready for the start of the 2014/15 football and rugby league seasons, meant outside help was needed and it had ensured “value for money”.

Proposals for the stadium and a neighbouring retail development including John Lewis, Marks & Spencer and Next stores, were approved in May, despite opponents claiming the shopping scheme would force city-centre businesses to close.

Among the firms enlisted by the council in 2011/12 were construction consultants Gardiner & Theobald, who were paid £32,508, Leeds law firm Walker Morris (£26,902) and stadium consultancy company Five Lines (£26,638).

Conservative group leader Coun Ian Gillies , a long-standing critic of the amount of public spending on the project, said: “Despite all the promises to reduce consultancy payments, the administration continues to borrow money and increase the spend on consultants.

“Council officers need to be accountable for actions, and to have the necessary expertise to take decisions and be responsible and accountable for those decisions, not to default to outside consultation.”

Neil Taylor, the council’s interim director of city and environmental services, said: “There are times when it is necessary to utilise external expertise, when we do not have the expertise internally or to ensure that the delivery of our services continues during unexpected short-term peaks in demand, and this is always subject to the proper procurement processes.”

He said the project was “one of the largest and most complex” in the council’s history, and the “specialist” nature of much of the work meant it could only be carried out externally. He said: “All funds allocated to this project so far have been approved by full council.”

Comments(12)

The Great Buda says...
9:06am Mon 3 Sep 12

Nothing compared to the money the Tax payer will get back from this in rent.

Investment = reward.

Gary Gilmores Eyes says...
9:19am Mon 3 Sep 12

‘The Great Buda says... 9:06am Mon 3 Sep 12
Nothing compared to the money the Tax payer will get back from this in rent.

Investment = reward.’


That’s not strictly true.
Not all private investments lead to profit.
Not all government monetary investments lead to profit/better services for the public.
Not all monies invested into businesses lead to profit.
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/List_of_bus
iness_failures

Even AndyD says...
9:31am Mon 3 Sep 12

Presumably, before the Freedom of Information Act, journalists used to have to work. Must have been terrible for them.....

Woody G Mellor says...
9:41am Mon 3 Sep 12

Yet another lame feature from The Press trying to get a rise out of the "I'm a tax payer" brigade. Yawn.

meme says...
9:53am Mon 3 Sep 12

The footie club is a business its not council owned and the new community stadium is to be used by football and rugby clubs with seperate buildings providing the so called community infrastrucure
Why should tax payers support private enterprise other than for the political needs of JA and co?

Woody G Mellor says...
10:21am Mon 3 Sep 12

meme wrote:
The footie club is a business its not council owned and the new community stadium is to be used by football and rugby clubs with seperate buildings providing the so called community infrastrucure
Why should tax payers support private enterprise other than for the political needs of JA and co?
1.

The Great Buda says...
11:43am Mon 3 Sep 12

meme wrote:
The footie club is a business its not council owned and the new community stadium is to be used by football and rugby clubs with seperate buildings providing the so called community infrastrucure
Why should tax payers support private enterprise other than for the political needs of JA and co?
You took a big bite on that bit of bait didn't you.

meme says...
1:26pm Mon 3 Sep 12

Yes I did!!
I want the club to prosper etc but am not happy about £420K of our money going to it for political reasons when its a private business especially when the current politicians are so inept.
Supporters have their views and good for them but others have no interest in footie yet we foot the bill
We all know this is never going to make money in fact I predict future headlines along lines of 'community stadium defecit!! etc. Such is life but I still cannot work out why its cost the york ratepayers so much Why did the develpers not pay? Or are our council so inept the idea never crossed their minds?

Even AndyD says...
5:02pm Mon 3 Sep 12

Private money goes to businesses all the time, Meme. School dinner providers, medical supplies and not to mention the £1billion which bailed our banks out! All taxpayer cash.

Good job you don't live in Eastleigh Borough area, their council have just spent £40m acquiring and developing Hampshire cricket ground. You'd explode!

Community stadium, mate - for which YCFC will pay rent.

PKH says...
5:29pm Mon 3 Sep 12

meme wrote:
The footie club is a business its not council owned and the new community stadium is to be used by football and rugby clubs with seperate buildings providing the so called community infrastrucure
Why should tax payers support private enterprise other than for the political needs of JA and co?
A lot of the money was spent under the LibDem watch, the figure is for over three years so why just single Labour out?????

nearlyman says...
7:27pm Mon 3 Sep 12

....................
.....'.'Legal Guidance''..........
......Do we not have a council legal department with people capable of guiding the council in these matters.............
...if not.... why not ??

jgycfc says...
1:42am Tue 4 Sep 12

I bet Gillies is glad to get back in the paper. JA et al stealing his limelight with their internal collapse. Er I mean ejecting of rotten apples. er, I mean everything is tickerty-boo .

I'd rather they spent that on consultants than use their own impeccable-track-rec
ord staff on public finances, public building work type behaviours. it would be hidden wooden dollars and a shambles of a scrapped scheme at the end otherwise... #justsaying

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree