Childminders tell York MP Julian Sturdy of their deregulation fears

Julian Sturdy, MP for outer York, at Moorlands nature reserve with children and their childminders Julian Sturdy, MP for outer York, at Moorlands nature reserve with children and their childminders

CHILDMINDERS from York are lobbying against possible new Government rules which they say could put children’s safety at risk.

The York North Childminders met local MP Julian Sturdy yesterday to air their concerns and he has agreed to pass them on to the Government.

Education Secretary Michael Gove has commissioned work on the feasibility of alternative systems, but the news has prompted fears that roles, qualifications or inspection systems could change.

Members of the York group, which consists of about 15 childminders from around Rawcliffe and Clifton Moor , say they fear that if childminders are deregulated, then there would be fewer checks on people caring for young children.

Amanda Brigham, from the York group, said: “If this were to go ahead, the safety and development of children in the early years sector would be severely compromised.”

She said: “If we were deregulated, you would not need insurance and you would not need to be Ofsted-registered. It would mean anyone could work with children without checks.”

She said childminders should not be seen as a cheaper or less professional form of care, simply because they worked at home.

Speaking after the meeting, Mr Sturdy said: “The safety and wellbeing of local children must always be paramount and parents need assurance that their child will receive quality care, whether this is provided by a childminder or nursery.

“I firmly believe that we also need to strike the right balance so that childcare providers are not restricted by unnecessary red tape. As such, I will be writing to Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Education, to request that his Department works hand in hand with professions from the sector for the long-term benefit of parents, childminders and children.”

He said like countless parents across York, he appreciated the “tremendous skills and contribution” childminders could make and said it was a privilege to meet the York group.

Comments(10)

keeks says...
1:31pm Sat 18 Aug 12

would you be happy to leave your child with someone who has not had a check done on themselves or their home!
We wouldn't leave our dogs with just anyone!!!!!
Madness!

Sue333 says...
8:25pm Sat 18 Aug 12

Ofsted are useless. I'm a childminder but I would hope parents would check for themselves whether they think I'm suitable, not rely on Ofsted's box-ticking. Surely no-one relies on what Ofsted say. I certainly wouldn't if I were choosing a childminder. My first inspector couldn't even find my house, in spite of the fact the number is on it twice. Would you really trust the judgement of someone like that? I invite parents into my home as many times as they want, and provide references. There's no reason insurance couldn't be provided for unregistered childminders. I would hesitate to trust someone who thought an Ofsted grading had any value (and mine is good, so no sour grapes! I just know it's not related to how good a childminder is). I know an 'outstanding' childminder who can barely speak English and doesn';t put warm clothes on the children in her care in the winter. But there are no boxes on ofsted's form for real life things like that.

RoseD says...
11:19am Sun 19 Aug 12

All good points Sue333. Parent(s) working to keep in control of debt, bills and such are anxious to save money. Its an employer's economy, so no sense trying to get a wage increase. Both ends of the life spectrum need quality care, and neither end is affordable. Safety and comfort (and love and respect) cannot be measured equally. My daughter was in a "high quality" place and yet isolated, allowed to fall, and bullied when she didnt want a nap. Her next provider was wonderful, a sweet natured bundle of kindness who had her potty trained in a day or so, and whom Em still recalls with fondness. Sadly we then went to the famous pre-school where, you guessed it, Em was isolated....

Guy Fawkes says...
6:23pm Sun 19 Aug 12

What we have here is a vested interest group campaigning against the loss of their monopoly, pure and simple. The same thing happened a few years ago when the big trade unions all supported the call for a new law that would have made it illegal to carry out DIY maintenance and repairs on the electrical wiring in your home. Of course, qualified electricians would have stood to make a lot of money doing jobs that anyone with a screwdriver and a modicum of common sense could have done perfectly safely if the law had been passed (thankfully it wasn't). Likewise, these childminders would like us to believe that if we entrust our kids to anyone who does not have the qualification they have spent time and money obtaining, the floodgates will be opened to hordes of Ian Huntley types waiting to do their worst.

The desire by professions of all sorts to operate within a legally enforced closed shop is as old as the hills. Every time you have Granny looking after your kids for free, that's £20 an hour or so that they kiss goodbye to. So it's not surprising that outlawing Granny from doing the job is on their agenda. Such calls for big government regulation should therefore be resisted like mad except in the small minority of cases where independent evidence makes a convincing case that regulation achieves more good than harm.

old_geezer says...
9:18am Mon 20 Aug 12

I accept that special interest groups plead their own case. And that box-ticking instead of experienced judgement is a curse of our age. But Guy Fawkes strikes me as amazingly optimistic in face of the evidence that human nature always includes its quota (varying in different contexts) of greed, laziness and criminality.

Zetkin says...
2:20pm Mon 20 Aug 12

Of course the deregulation is proposed by Michael Gove, the same man who's started talking about derergulating schools by allowing unqualified teachers in.

Will you all be satisfied then with references and an open invitation to visit, or would you prefer the people teaching your kids to A-level actually have some qualifications in their subject?

I share the childmiders' concerns - state regulation is certainly far from perfect, but at least it's an obstacle in the way of unscrupulous profiteers and paedophiles taking control of the nurseries.

piaggio1 says...
10:56pm Mon 20 Aug 12

who had her potty trained in a day or so??

erm! should,nt YOU have done that. i take it YOU are the parent??

Silver says...
11:06pm Mon 20 Aug 12

If someone is willing to take a job that supports the family whilst both parents take jobs and does it for an affordable wage and then does a great job. Yes these jobs are useful so long as proper checks are in place. Not gonna bore people with the obvious but some people will be better at this then others perhaps we need a star rating and something like a crb check. Those who the law deems safe and then the results parents rate on their ability. I had a nanny as a kid whilst my parents worked during the summer holiday and went to clubs during the summer school holidays to keep me safe and I bet every parent in employment wants the security of knowing their children are safe and happy lets not lose that

dlmcstay says...
4:35pm Wed 22 Aug 12

@Guy Fawkes.... £20 per hour?!? Can you please advise me where in your world childminders are charging £20 per hour?? I'm a York childminder (in fact i'm one of the childminders pictured in the above article) and I charge £3.60 per hour....You might also be interested to know that under current OFSTED regulation, grandparents are perfectly entitled to care for their grandchildren so I hardly think we live in fear of losing all our income to pensioners just yet! Your state that we are a vested interest group primarily concerned about losing our "monopoly" in the childcare market (?!?). Your statement is completely and utterly inaccurate. Our concerns, if you are at all interested, first and foremost are to do with the risk that de-regulation poses to children where home based childcare no longer requires any parameters or checks or boundaries. Where no qualification or training is required to become a childcare provider, where ongoing risk assessments or investment in a child's learning or development is no longer required. De-regulation would significantly lower the quality of the current standard required from childminders by OFSTED (a standard that is equal to the standard expected in nurseries or any other early years setting) and would subsequently diminish the high profile and reputation of those of us who have worked hard and continue to work hard every day to provide high quality childcare. These are our concerns and they are real and valid, and have nothing to do with losing out on huge earning potential!!

Flower's says...
9:10am Fri 24 Aug 12

Why in the world would you not want your child to go to a safe vetted regulated person? Children are our most precious possession... Yet some would leave them with "just anybody" providing its cheap enough!! Nice one! They might be cheap but not neccessarly cheerful...children can very easily be scared for life...
@ £20 per hour ??!!?? ** (note to self.. I must give myself a MASSIVE pay rise :0) )

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree