Fifth Avenue traffic plan set for approval

Simon Moss, chairman of Tang Hall Residents Association, who is unhappy about traffic plans for Derwenthorpe Simon Moss, chairman of Tang Hall Residents Association, who is unhappy about traffic plans for Derwenthorpe

EXTRA vehicles look set to be allowed along a York street to reach a major housing development despite residents’ objections.

Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust wants to be abe to increase the amount of traffic going to and from the 540-home Derwenthorpe site through Fifth Avenue, Tang Hall , and City of York Council planning officers are recommending approval for their bid.

Officers say the road is relatively wide with grassed verges and houses set back behind front gardens, and the proposed extra traffic along the road is unlikely to lead to an adverse impact on residents’ day-to-day living conditions.

“The impact on noise and disturbance is unlikely to cause significant additional harm to the living conditions of existing residents so as to warrant refusal,” says a report to a planning committee meeting next week.

The Press has reported previously how the trust wants Fifth Avenue to be used for vehicles going to and from 277 properties, instead of 185 homes, as was originally proposed. But it will also reduce the number of homes reached through Osbaldwick Village from 105 to 64, and the number reached through the Meadlands estate from 125 dwellings to 74.

The Tang Hall Residents Association has opposed the changes, claiming the area was being made a “scapegoat” and the report to councillors says eight letters of objection have been received from Fifth Avenue residents.

They claimed the road already has traffic problems and the proposal would overburden it to appease Osbaldwick and Meadlands residents.

They said it was unfair for local residents to bear the brunt of traffic from Derwenthorpe, and also raised concerns about poor visibility at the Fifth Avenue/Tang Hall Lane junction.

Officers said an accident analysis of the past five years had shown there had been five accidents in Fifth Avenue, four of which occurred at the junction with Tang Hall Lane.

“The accident data does not identify any pattern nor indicate any specific type of accident which there would be the increased risk of potential for, should traffic levels increase as proposed,” they said, adding that existing traffic calming would further improve safety and reduce the potential for speeding.

Comments(5)

xtc says...
3:21pm Thu 19 Jul 12

Other people have to live too!!we live on a main route in and out of york....traffic !!so what the fact theres more housing for those who need it and jrt to cherry pick who lives there is great we ve put in to live there but wont get one and if its that much bother move...simples!!

Jazzper says...
4:48pm Thu 19 Jul 12

Simon Moss....one word, Nimby!

Even AndyD says...
5:10pm Thu 19 Jul 12

Look at any city and you will see how areas change hugely as development takes place. Acomb was once a village, for example. I'm sorry but campaigning that you might get a bit more traffic because hundreds of homes are being built is simply not valid. What are we supposed to do - stop all house-building because people have to pass through existing areas to get to it? Nah. When Tang Hall was built, doubtless it created traffic too - you can't just say everything stops once your home is up!

york_chap says...
5:11pm Thu 19 Jul 12

To be fair to the guy, I wouldn't be happy if this was going on in my street either. 300+ extra cars, visitors' cars, refuse lorries and delivery vans/trucks soon adds up to a lot of extra noise and through traffic.

Magicman! says...
2:26am Fri 20 Jul 12

Look carefully at an aerial image or map of the Heworth area and you will see 5th Avenue was built to originally go further than it ended up doing, likewise for Bad bargain Lane (this was supposed to go through to Murton Moor with road links to Stockton on the Forst or to the A166)... Surely if you buy a house on a road that has that look as though it was originally meant to continue, you should expect that one day it will continue and thus carry more traffic. The rest of 5th avenue is a through road and carries traffic, and this little end bit is the same width - the only differences is it still retains concrete slabs as road surface (though this can have tarmac put over), and the streetlights are a lower power.

As has already been said, when any housing development is built it creates extra traffic - so what gives somebody the right to force a line to be drawn at a point comfortable to them?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree