Anger grows at £3k-a-week cost of interim council chief Neil Taylor

ANGER is growing about the estimated £3,000-a-week cost to City of York Council of appointing a new interim director of city and environment services.

Independent councillor Mark Warters has written to chief executive Kersten England to request a full breakdown of the costs of appointing Neil Taylor in the wake of the retirement of Bill Woolley.

The Press revealed last week that Mr Taylor’s recruitment, through executive recruitment firm Gatenby Sanderson, was expected to cost the authority about £3,000 a week.

Coun Warters said taxpayers in Osbaldwick had raised the matter with him.

Green councillor Andy D’Agorne has also raised concerns. He said: “When posts lower down are going unfilled or being deleted, and other staff expected to cover the work, this sends all the wrong messages to the workforce.”

Mrs England said she would ask Mr Taylor to meet group leaders so they could “get a sense of the scale of work which he will be handling.”

She said that given the scale of reduction in the senior management group – from 28 to 17 – she did not feel it was advisable to cover the workload from existing resources and put major important schemes for the city, such as Access York, at any risk.

Labour council leader James Alexander said Coun Warters had not raised any issues when group leaders were sent an email about the matter from Mrs England.

Comments(16)

pedalling paul says...
10:01am Tue 19 Jun 12

Such are the joys of having Independent Councillors. They can bring a breath of fresh air into local politics, but the lack of Party discipline can sometimes also create loose cannons........!

lowbeam says...
10:11am Tue 19 Jun 12

what,exactly,makes this position worth £3000 per week?

Silver says...
10:15am Tue 19 Jun 12

Simple maths this will cost £44k in total, they had plenty of time to find a replacement and hire them. This £44k could have been spent keeping two people in a position to deliver services to the city for a year. Instead of managing them.

AngryandFrustrated says...
11:07am Tue 19 Jun 12

It is actually quite startling that a local authority would fail in its duty to replace Mr Woolley, prior to his departure. I say this on the assumption that Mr Woolley did have a defined notice period and did work that notice period. If he didn't, the person who gave him his contract should be sacked. If he did, A&E (great way of describing those two so kudos to the person that came up with that!) should hang their heads in shame.

We have a Chief Exec that is paid a very similar salary to that of David Cameron. She should get off her backside and start earning that 6 figure salary by DOING HER JOB and making sure that senior roles within the Council are filled with minimum fuss and expense to the tax-payer. As for Alexander he should be asking the questions himself regarding this expense, not Mark Warters!

As a life long Labour supporter, this current shower disgust me!

osbaldwicklane says...
11:08am Tue 19 Jun 12

pedalling paul wrote:
Such are the joys of having Independent Councillors. They can bring a breath of fresh air into local politics, but the lack of Party discipline can sometimes also create loose cannons........!
Paul , some times its good to have a loose cannon . After this lot have left office we will be still paying for them .

ReginaldBiscuit says...
11:54am Tue 19 Jun 12

Ceremonial Chief Exec £150,000+
Temporary Director (not required) £160,000+
Council Limo £60,000+

At least the Limo doesn't need a massive pension.

REFUSE to pay your taxes folks. You're being taken for a ride.

meme says...
3:56pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Its a disgrace
How could they not have planned for this as Wooley's retirement has been known about for ages?
What can a temp do in 12 weeks for this sort of money?
Wooley will have retired on a pension circa £85000 pa.....I wish I could and what exactly did he do to deserve this money?
K England will get even more
I am not one for civil disobedience but even my patience and good nature is being stretched to breaking point

meme says...
4:11pm Tue 19 Jun 12

York citizen ..Are u mad?
For £3K per week or £156000 pa plus a retirement package of say 80% of final salary who would not want to make some personal sacrifices? Plus of course 'expenses'
Live in the real world. These are huge sums of money to most of us and to get them you should be giving up life itself
You sum up all of what is wrong with the 'political' class. You have lost track of the worth of these people.
They are public servants not wealth creators and should be paid as such

Pete the Brickie says...
4:33pm Tue 19 Jun 12

You wouldn't mind this sort of behaviour if they'd made enough savings to keep council tax down and weren't cutting funding to charities serving the vulnerable and blaming the government.

The council should simply do what private companies are doing when people leave or retire, ask the existing staff to plug the gaps. People on modest wages are doing just that out in the real world to keep firms viable, why on earth can't the senior staff at COYC do the same for three to five times the average wage? James Alexander should be coming down on Kirsten England publicly like a ton of bricks and demanding her and her deputies sing for their very large suppers.

When he fails to do so I hope Eric Pickles is reading what the council tax payers of York think about it and acts swiftly.

the butler says...
6:41pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Quoting Meme's remarks, did not Mr Wooley have a contract, which states the condition of employment? If so why such confusion?

marvell says...
10:37pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Don't forget that 20% of that £3k is the fee charged by Gatenby Sanderson.

What an utterly shocking waste of valuable public money when valuable charities are being cut due to the spendthrift nature of this Labour cabinet. It's nothing to do with government - the local administration are fairly and squarely in charge of the budget and who gets cut and who doesn't.

Mr Crabtree says...
1:04pm Wed 20 Jun 12

Pete the Brickie

I suspect that James Alexander is as responsible for this appointment as KE. It is no secret that both of them didn't get on with Woolley, and the void created seems likely to have been engineered, so they could bring in NT.

I am dismayed that KE seems to be saying that Access York is a priority. What about the LDF ? What about the housing crisis ? What about all the stalled developments, what about York's economy that is iheld back by these issues ?

I hope that NT identifies some of the deadwood dealing with these issues and who's misleading reports have killed housebuilding in the city. York's obsession with transport is a misplaced priority when there are far more serious issues facing the city such as a housing shortage caused by irresponsible policies. I sincerely hope that NT gives KE and JA some hometruths.

Mr Crabtree says...
1:10pm Wed 20 Jun 12

THE AXE MAN COMMETH......

Rumour has it, that Bill Woolley's temporary replacement, Neil Taylor, has been parachuted in to do a hatchet job on under-performing policies and officers. Those behind the affordable housing policy have been living on borrowed time and will certainly be on his 'hit list'.

It's my guess that NT will earn his £3k/week by cutting the council's wage bill by getting rid of the housing strategy officers who's policies don't build houses. Bill Woolley wouldn't sort these culprits out, and with their defender gone, they will be easy meat for NT who will hopefully give them the chop.

We live in hope !

Mr Crabtree says...
1:11pm Wed 20 Jun 12

NT may also use his regeneration and large-scale PFI project experiences to use the councils land for a massive affordable housing programme with more joint ventures/collaborati

ons with JRHT and housing associations. If he does, then, I hope this will result in the lowering of AH targets for S106/planning gain to 10%.

Hopefully, he will identify the causes of York's failure to deliver housing, which we know is down to policy, certain officers and certain councillors. There needs to be a radical change in approach and attitude, and those who are unable to adapt, will have to go.

There is a real opportunity to unlock York's potential, which has been held back by blinkered, ideological councillors and officers for too long.

Mr Crabtree says...
1:17pm Wed 20 Jun 12

To point Mr Taylor in the right direction, he should look at the work of the following officers:-

Head of Major Projects & Initiatives.
Housing Strategy Manager.
Housing Development Manager.

What has the work of these individuals produced in terms of housing completions ?

Why have reports written by the first two contained skewed statistics which try to make York look like it is no different to the rest of the country, in terms of the decline in housing completions and planning consents ?

It's time that these politicised officers were made to answer for the mess they have assisted in creating.

Hope Mr Taylor is following this thread......

osbaldwicklane says...
3:54pm Wed 20 Jun 12

Quote......It's time that these politicised officers were made to answer for the mess they have assisted in creating.

Hope Mr Taylor is following this thread..

If he is do you think Alexander will let him do anything about it. Not a chance , its like that because thats how he wants it .

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree