Poppleton parish council's ‘village green’ Park&Ride plan anger

A PARISH council is to object over plans to build part of a new Park&Ride site in York on land which was made a village green 45 years ago.

The creation of the 600-space car park at Poppleton will play a major role in City of York Council’s £22 million Access York project, aimed at tackling congestion in the city.

Construction is due to start early next year.

Recent studies have revealed a section of the land was designated for community use as a village green in 1967.

City of York Council said it will apply to alter the layout of the development so a green space can be included. But following a meeting with transport chiefs, Upper Poppleton Parish Council has said it will formally object.

It claimed local residents had not been fully informed of the village green situation or consulted about it.

In a statement, the parish council’s chairman, Peter Hawkins, said last week’s meeting was the first time they had been informed of the “process to remove village green status” and said this had caused “annoyance” as it believed it had been kept out of the loop.

He said: “It was felt this was symptomatic of the city council’s attitude to parish councils in general, with a failure to recognise they are elected bodies who are fully authorised and have a duty to represent the views of the electorate they serve.”

Access York received £15.3 million in Government funding last year, and the project will also include an upgrade of the A59/A1237 roundabout and bus priority measures on Boroughbridge Road and the replacement of the Askham Bar Park&Ride site with a larger, 1,100-space car park.

The city council has said it will apply to make a “limited amendment” to the Poppleton site’s design to allow a “village green area” to be incorporated. The council said this would mean the land can be used as a “high-quality community asset for the first time”.

It said full details would emerge when the proposal is submitted this month and any changes will not affect the timescales or cost of the project.

Comments(9)

pedalling paul says...
9:58am Tue 19 Jun 12

One wonders whether any villagers have actually used this peripheral "green" which is separated from the village by the A59. There is a much more formal "green" in the village centre. Do I recall seeing a maypole on it?
Yes the Parish Council should be fully and formally consulted, but I think that there is an overriding need to give Poppleton residents a high quality alternative to the car, for short distance commuting into York. This of course includes a "Pedal & Ride"option, as the new P&R will have signalled routes across the A59 with separate on-site cycle access and racks.
Betcha a good few Poppleton residents will be oiling up their bike chains in months to come....

who are ya says...
10:31am Tue 19 Jun 12

Instead of investing in buses why not trams at poppleton. I think the train is hourly from York so why not use the rail to its full potential. Park and Rail maybe? no adding bus lanes no adding more vehicles. Just a thought. By the way P.P. no need to mark my spelling like a teacher, if you dissagree dont be so pathetic as to say the comment must be bad because of spelling mistake.

pedalling paul says...
11:00am Tue 19 Jun 12

OOoh Matron.....!
By the way, the BBC website is running a story about a new agreement between Bus operators in York, for a unified through ticketing system. Will we see it on The Press website before the day is out....?

Oncebitten says...
11:24am Tue 19 Jun 12

who are ya wrote:
Instead of investing in buses why not trams at poppleton. I think the train is hourly from York so why not use the rail to its full potential. Park and Rail maybe? no adding bus lanes no adding more vehicles. Just a thought. By the way P.P. no need to mark my spelling like a teacher, if you dissagree dont be so pathetic as to say the comment must be bad because of spelling mistake.
Now that would be far too senisible and far too logical....but people that live in these places have to accept expansion...its inevitable.

Spencer69 says...
8:05pm Tue 19 Jun 12

who are ya wrote:
Instead of investing in buses why not trams at poppleton. I think the train is hourly from York so why not use the rail to its full potential. Park and Rail maybe? no adding bus lanes no adding more vehicles. Just a thought. By the way P.P. no need to mark my spelling like a teacher, if you dissagree dont be so pathetic as to say the comment must be bad because of spelling mistake.
Think this would be a very good idea. But at the meeting last week regarding phase 1 of the A59 bus corridor, this question was asked and the reply was something like, "The people of Poppleton won't like that". But it seem that the residents of Boroughbridge Road and Poppleton Road would like a bus lane built near their houses! NOT!! The bus corridors estimated cost is around £925,000 and the estimate time saved on a journey, that assuming the P&R doesnt get caught behind a number 10 at the bus stop collecting passenger, will be 4 minutes and 44 seconds over all 3 phases.

Complete waste of money and you should see the dangerous layout.

Stop the implementation of this proposed bus lanes, email your objections to;- mark.reade@york.gov.
uk or ben.potter@york.gov.
uk

pedalling paul says...
8:46pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Spencer69 wrote:
who are ya wrote:
Instead of investing in buses why not trams at poppleton. I think the train is hourly from York so why not use the rail to its full potential. Park and Rail maybe? no adding bus lanes no adding more vehicles. Just a thought. By the way P.P. no need to mark my spelling like a teacher, if you dissagree dont be so pathetic as to say the comment must be bad because of spelling mistake.
Think this would be a very good idea. But at the meeting last week regarding phase 1 of the A59 bus corridor, this question was asked and the reply was something like, "The people of Poppleton won't like that". But it seem that the residents of Boroughbridge Road and Poppleton Road would like a bus lane built near their houses! NOT!! The bus corridors estimated cost is around £925,000 and the estimate time saved on a journey, that assuming the P&R doesnt get caught behind a number 10 at the bus stop collecting passenger, will be 4 minutes and 44 seconds over all 3 phases.

Complete waste of money and you should see the dangerous layout.

Stop the implementation of this proposed bus lanes, email your objections to;- mark.reade@york.gov.

uk or ben.potter@york.gov.

uk
Before you dive in headfirst, check out similar bus gating arrangements along the inbound side of Hull Road. They work without controversy and give the P&R a competitive time saving edge over private car journeys.

Spencer69 says...
9:31pm Tue 19 Jun 12

pedalling paul wrote:
Spencer69 wrote:
who are ya wrote:
Instead of investing in buses why not trams at poppleton. I think the train is hourly from York so why not use the rail to its full potential. Park and Rail maybe? no adding bus lanes no adding more vehicles. Just a thought. By the way P.P. no need to mark my spelling like a teacher, if you dissagree dont be so pathetic as to say the comment must be bad because of spelling mistake.
Think this would be a very good idea. But at the meeting last week regarding phase 1 of the A59 bus corridor, this question was asked and the reply was something like, "The people of Poppleton won't like that". But it seem that the residents of Boroughbridge Road and Poppleton Road would like a bus lane built near their houses! NOT!! The bus corridors estimated cost is around £925,000 and the estimate time saved on a journey, that assuming the P&R doesnt get caught behind a number 10 at the bus stop collecting passenger, will be 4 minutes and 44 seconds over all 3 phases.

Complete waste of money and you should see the dangerous layout.

Stop the implementation of this proposed bus lanes, email your objections to;- mark.reade@york.gov.


uk or ben.potter@york.gov.


uk
Before you dive in headfirst, check out similar bus gating arrangements along the inbound side of Hull Road. They work without controversy and give the P&R a competitive time saving edge over private car journeys.
Have you seen the proposed A59 bus corridor? Guessing not. It will be very dangerous to cyclists and pedestrians, particularly young children going to and from school, if it is implemented. It will be more dangerous that the bus lane that was removed from Fulford Road back in 2010. SAFETY has to come before an ESTIMATED!!4 minute 44second time saving.

shiftywillow says...
10:32pm Tue 19 Jun 12

Yep, I totally agree with the Park and Rail option on the A59, it would be a much more greener option and would be more sustainable, maximising the rail service to the city. And this would allow for less buses cluttering up York's road system.
.
I used to cycle down Boroughbridge Road/Water Lane/Leeman Road into town from Poppleton but the painted cycle lane on the edge of the road is totally inadequate and unsafe. I'm surprised that PP, a keen cyclist, hasn't recognised that.

Magicman! says...
3:07am Thu 21 Jun 12

here we go again... another development, another so-called "village green" getting in the way. This was tried for Osbaldwick, it's got in the way of a proper traffic management solution at Water End, and now the same status for what is essentially abandoned land may get in the way of something people actually use.

Whilst tram-trains have yet to be put into use on the UK Rail network (Sheffield-rotherham
), a "park and glide" option would make much more sense and would give reliable timings for the people actually using the service - because let's face it, the bus times from 3pm onward are going to be erratic due to the huge level of congestion York has due to everybody still driving everywhere.
The council can't even shoehorn in cycle lanes along the A59 that fullfil DfT guidelines (the lanes are too narrow), so how on earth are they going to fit in bus lanes??

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree