Report this comment
  • "
    BioLogic wrote:
    speaks99 wrote:
    It is not too late to act in York’s best interest; Much damage will be done if this development is prevented from going ahead;

    If any reader would like to see the Monks Cross 2 decision which was carried by an overwhelming majority proceed without further costly delaying tactics by those with self-interest the first step is to write to the;
    Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber
    Lateral
    8 City Walk
    Leeds
    LS11 9AT

    or e mail; yhenquiries@goyh.gsi







    Alternatively you could now e mail the Secretary of State direct at
    eric.pickles@communi




    ties.gsi.gov.uk

    State you support the project and enclose the planning application numbers 11/02581/OUTM and 11/02199/OUTM

    Nothing could be easier!!

    Example support could be e.g. more jobs, greater freedom of shopping choice, improved sporting facilities for our very successful football and rugby clubs, additional community and NHS facilities and access for all to York’s Explore library and information centre. That should be enough, but if more is needed then the fact that three major out of town centres have been developed and have not resulted in the Armageddon type catastrophe as predicted by those who are now objecting about two shops (one of whom is already present at Monks Cross) and a super new sports complex.
    You do realise that "support" letters are irrelevant in the decision making process. The simple trip is that someone asks for a call in and the the SecState makes a decision based on the fact.

    but if you want to waste your time jog on.
    Glad you think so. By the same token then objection letters are also pointless.

    But dont let that spoil your day!

    At the very least it is a tangible reminder to those making the decision that for every objection letter (of which i am sure there are a few) the is at least one additional person in support of the project. Whether you believe that matters to popularity hungry politicians or not I don't really care.

    Of course, I have also received a response from the office of Erik Pickles which states my opinion DOES matter and will be taken into consideration. If, like you say, writing in support has no effect then why say this, and not a standard letter which states that they will not take support letters into consideration - they are just inviting more letters of support with the reply I received.

    Could it actually be that as a long term opposer of this development YOU want supporters to believe that there is nothing they can do to help push the development through?

    Hmm I wonder..."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Tories in call for community stadium inquiry

YORK’S main opposition political group has called for the Government to stage a public inquiry over plans for a community stadium and two superstores on the edge of the city.

Oakgate (Monks Cross) Ltd’s proposals for a 6,000-seater arena to house York City FC and York City Knights, alongside John Lewis and Marks & Spencer stores, were approved by City of York Council last month.

The Department for Communities and Local Government must now decide whether the scheme is “called in”. The deadline for representations to the Government is today, with a decision expected within a month.

The council’s Conservative group has written to Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles listing 14 reasons why it believes an inquiry should be held.

It said the scheme “goes against York’s planning policy”, would cause “severe harm” to York’s road network and cause the city centre to lose an annual £50-90 million in revenue.

The Tories’ reasons also included the lack of a recommendation by planning officers on Oakgate’s scheme, adding councillors “never had a vote on the overall project early in the process”.

They claimed the jobs created by the scheme would be offset by city-centre losses and the “true potential financial costs to the council were never put before residents”.

Related links

Related links

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree