Report this comment
  • "
    pedalling paul wrote:
    I only hope that JA's publicly avowed support for the scheme, does not mean that he has done another Water End and privately urged his party colleagues to toe his line. If James wants to present his views, he should go via the same procedure as any Councillor not on the Planning Committee that wishes to address the meeting ie register to speak. That would be far more ethical than exerting pressure on colleagues via the media.
    Whatever the outcome, Alexander, has hedged his bets. If it fails, it was'nt his fault, because on the face of it he supported it. If it succeeds, he's a hero.

    Not long ago, he was saying that the private sector was pushing him to get the LDF adopted. This, he said was a priority and could not be delayed. Enter the Planning Inspector, who found the Core Strategy, after eight years in the making, potentially unsound. The result - a six-month delay, with the likelihood that it might still fail.

    If the stadium application is approved, the LDF fails automatically, so the question is, what exactly is James doing to ensure that the LDF is adopted ? Answer; NOTHING ! It sends out the message that it has failed, otherwise he would not be backing the stadium. James may end up a hero in the eyes of YCFC fans on Thursday, but, not in the eyes of his number two and number three; Coun Simpson-Laing and Coun Merrett. His two senior colleagues have backed the success of the LDF to the hilt and it's failure will make them look ridiculous after their predictions of it being certain to be found sound. Eight years work costing hundreds of thousands, thrown down the pan, for the sake of pandering to the footy fans and shoppers. Like the 'ides' (15th) of March was Julius Caesar's downfall, the ides (15th) of May could be the downfall of Julius Alexander, or should that be Judas Alexander..... just another back-stabber !"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Community stadium rejection would be ‘disaster for York’

COUNCIL leader James Alexander has warned that if a new stadium and two superstores are refused planning permission, it will send out a ‘disastrous’ message that York is closed for business.

The Labour leader of City of York Council claimed that Oakgate (Monks Cross) Ltd’s controversial proposals for land at Monks Cross represented the “opportunity of a generation.”

And he urged those in support of the scheme for a 6,000-seater ground and new John Lewis and Marks & Spencer stores to make their voices heard now.

“It’s important for such an important development that councillors hear from those that support the application as well as from those who don’t,” he said.

“Often it is only those who oppose schemes that make their voices heard, but for the sake of jobs and growth in this city, councillors need representations from those in favour too.

“As I’ve said before, turning this down is likely to turn down investment in our city for years and years to come and send the message that York is closed for business, and that would be disastrous for the city.”

But York Chamber of Trade chairman Adam Sinclair strongly refuted the claims, saying that if the scheme was approved, large parts of the city centre would “go to sleep and never wake up.”

He said: “The council’s own planning consultants Drivers Jonas Deloitte have confirmed that the Monks Cross proposals would have a significant adverse and long-term impact on the income of the world-class city centre, and on future investment in the centre.”

Green councillor Dave Taylor claimed Coun Alexander was “taking a risky punt into heavy seas with the proposals, which threaten to put hundreds of York citizens’ jobs at risk, and stifle business investment for years to come.”

The application will be determined by 16 councillors on the planning committee at a meeting on Thursday, without them having been given a recommendation by officials on whether to approve or refuse.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree