Residents’ anger over parking outside York school (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Residents’ anger over parking outside Holgate primary school
9:22am Tuesday 28th February 2012 in News
By Richard Catton, richard.catton@thepress.co.uk
Traffic congestion outside the new Our Lady Queen of Martyrs RC School in Holgate, at hometime
A SURGE in the number of parents dropping off and picking up their children at a York primary school has turned the street into a “battlefield” according to nearby residents.
Our Lady Queen of Martyrs RC School in Holgate opened last month following the merger of Our Lady’s and English Martyrs, which was demolished to make way for the new school.
However, the increase in pupil numbers is causing problems for residents, who say parents are parking illegally, driving onto grass verges and effectively turning Hamilton Drive into a one-way street.
Annette Cooper, 61, said: “I am sick of trying to get over the road. They are parking down each side of the road on the yellow lines. It’s backing up way past West Bank Park.
“This morning I couldn’t get across the road again and nobody will let you cross. It’s almost turned the road into a one-way street because of cars parked on each side of the road.
“I’m worried about a child getting knocked down,” she said.
Another local resident, Don Tyson, 72, said: “It’s a battlefield. They seem to get there really early to get a prime spot.”
“When they knock the other part of the building down I’m hoping they include some kind of drop-off point where you can drive in and back out.”
Coun Janet Looker, City of York Council’s head of Education, Children and Young People’s Services, said she had not been made aware of the problem at Our Lady Queen of Martyrs, but said parking around primary schools was “a nightmare” and said she would see what could be done about the situation in Hamilton Drive.
Head teacher Derek Sutherland said he understood the anger of local residents, but said the spring term was “always going to be difficult”.
He said: “It’s been a little bit more difficult with roadworks taking place nearby at the moment. Our staff don’t have a car park either at the moment so they are parking on the road. Our new one will open in May.”
He said staff were out every morning reminding parents of the school’s guidelines on parking and he also said local residents should contact the authorities or police if people parked illegally.
Comments(55)
Candy Cupcake
says...
9:42am Tue 28 Feb 12
ReginaldBiscuit
says...
9:50am Tue 28 Feb 12
AnotherPointofView
says...
9:58am Tue 28 Feb 12
Unfortunately this isn't the only school in York like this. The majority are nearly as bad. The Council should get tougher with the parents.
Mentos
says...
10:10am Tue 28 Feb 12
See how it goes after these two contributary factors are no longer present
AM14
says...
10:15am Tue 28 Feb 12
unclebuck
says...
10:17am Tue 28 Feb 12
pedalling paul
says...
10:19am Tue 28 Feb 12
Even where offspring live within practicable walking or cycling distance, there is a reluctance by some parents to let their offspring travel under their own steam.
Green travel plans, walking buses, safe cycle routes and training all help to damp down this trend and CoYC is in the "top tier" of Local Authorities who promote these alternative choices.
Past attitudes may be summarised in a cartoon picture that I saw. A school run mum was pointing to a cyclist that she'd just flattened while saying to her son "See, I told you the roads aren't safe to pedal on!"
Ignatius Lumpopo
says...
10:46am Tue 28 Feb 12
lis0r
says...
10:54am Tue 28 Feb 12
Keepthewheelsturning
says...
11:21am Tue 28 Feb 12
Bigwood
says...
11:26am Tue 28 Feb 12
dsom73
says...
11:50am Tue 28 Feb 12
I blame the council.
And John Guildford.
Pete the Brickie
says...
12:12pm Tue 28 Feb 12
pedalling paul says...
10:19am Tue 28 Feb 12
There seems to be a reluctance by many school staff to live close to their workplace
The reason for this is obvious to anybody Paul, if they lived any nearer they could get to school when it's snowing.
lis0r
says...
1:11pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Pete the Brickie wrote:And here was me thinking it's because teaching is so badly paid that most of them can't afford to live close to their school.
pedalling paul says...
10:19am Tue 28 Feb 12
There seems to be a reluctance by many school staff to live close to their workplace
The reason for this is obvious to anybody Paul, if they lived any nearer they could get to school when it's snowing.
YorkPatrol
says...
1:46pm Tue 28 Feb 12
was york now rotherham
says...
1:47pm Tue 28 Feb 12
alfie
says...
1:49pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Pete the Brickie
says...
2:04pm Tue 28 Feb 12
lis0r wrote:Yes you might have something there, property whithin walking distance of a school is always much more expensive. That being the case it must be almost impossible for teaching staff to find homes in the small, remote villages in which they are forced to live in order to be easily cut off by a slight fall of snow, which of course all contain said learning establishments close to most dwellings in them.
Pete the Brickie wrote:And here was me thinking it's because teaching is so badly paid that most of them can't afford to live close to their school.
pedalling paul says...
10:19am Tue 28 Feb 12
There seems to be a reluctance by many school staff to live close to their workplace
The reason for this is obvious to anybody Paul, if they lived any nearer they could get to school when it's snowing.
This post was sponsored by Gooddoc and ZuluCharlie
Disclaimer
The stunts described above such as getting out of bed when it's snowing and going to work are undertaken by normal people with no specialist training or equipment. No claims will be accepted for injuries to teaching professionals attempting to copy them.
ZuluCharlie
says...
2:27pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Walt the brickie
BioLogic
says...
2:39pm Tue 28 Feb 12
pedalling paul wrote:Paul you have surpassed yourself
There seems to be a reluctance by many school staff to live close to their workplace. Also parents do not have to send their kids to the school nearest where they choose to live. So a lot of lifestyle decisions are being made which create car dependancy.
Even where offspring live within practicable walking or cycling distance, there is a reluctance by some parents to let their offspring travel under their own steam.
Green travel plans, walking buses, safe cycle routes and training all help to damp down this trend and CoYC is in the "top tier" of Local Authorities who promote these alternative choices.
Past attitudes may be summarised in a cartoon picture that I saw. A school run mum was pointing to a cyclist that she'd just flattened while saying to her son "See, I told you the roads aren't safe to pedal on!"
"reluctance by many school staff to live close to their workplace"
Do you have any concept of the financial pressures that affect people. Staff will drive as they cannot afford to live near their work, or because their families are settled in another area. Parents will often drive children to school for the same reason and dont use "park and stride" because they do not have time. Most schools offer a very narrow window in which to drop off children off and any pre-school clubs come at a cost that many parents can ill afford.
"Green travel plans, walking buses, safe cycle routes and training" are simply a smokescreen to make it look like authorities are tackling a problem by trying to make it look like it is everybody's fault but theirs for addressing travel issues in a practical and realistic way that people can and will actually adopt. The stick is no good without the carrot!
This time paul you really have succeeded in being a pompous ****!
Guy Fawkes
says...
2:43pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Pete the Brickie
says...
2:49pm Tue 28 Feb 12
ZuluCharlie wrote:I hardly think my quips are comparable with Disney's work Charlie.
Just like I've said previously Pete...... You've been found out.
Walt the brickie
minicooper
says...
3:21pm Tue 28 Feb 12
idlehousewife
says...
3:54pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Big Bad Wolf
says...
4:08pm Tue 28 Feb 12
idlehousewife wrote:I agree ... Elvington school is a nightmare at 8.45 and 15.30
Elvington school is just the same.There is an accident just waiting to happen.
Big Bad Wolf
says...
4:10pm Tue 28 Feb 12
yorkborn66
says...
4:18pm Tue 28 Feb 12
The usual scenario is one parent works part time around school times and may need to travel to work by car to get there on time. Of course there are parents that are just plain lazy and cannot be bothered to walk and go back home.
I have a daughter starting university and 2 youngsters that walk to school about 15 mins walk, and they do no matter what the weather, and it amazes me to see parents who live within 10 mins walking distance taking the kids in the car, and going back home.
Cycling to school would be a great option, but if you have two young children riding on the footpath and the parent on the road, what does the parent do with the kid’s bikes once the kids are in school? . Magnify this by the amount of parents and kids then the paths would be a motorway for young kids on bikes, and pedestrians, especially are older citizens would rightfully complain.
If you buy a house near a school it would be reasonable to expect a little disruption around school time, also the value of your property will be significantly higher. But this amount of disruption is beyond a joke.
I fully sympathize with the local residents on this, I had to travel past this school Monday in my work van on kick out, and it was mayhem.
Is it the school at fault, or maybe York council for not having a strategy in place to accommodate extra car traffic at planning stage?
As other posters have said this is not just a problem at this school but also, many other schools. Extending the zig zag lines and possibly having double yellow lines that are signposted to come into effect around school time would work for safety of the children but would only move the cars to the closest streets to the school at start and finish. Thus moving the problem elsewhere.
It will be interesting to see the knock on effect of extra car journeys if Burnholme School does close.
Walking to school or cycling is the answer if possible, but the more schools that close, the further parents and kids have to travel.
YorkPatrol
says...
4:46pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Really, a Battlefield?? Do the parents dive out of their cars and take cover whilst lobbing grenades into the resident’s gardens, are snipers stationed at key strategic points to infiltrate the school leavers with the teachers using drones to take out the lollypop lady?
The ages of the “2” complaining residents says it all – busy body, curtain twitches with nothing else letter to do. If they had anything about them, they set up a business charging for the use of their drive spaces
Caecilius
says...
4:58pm Tue 28 Feb 12
bananapajama
says...
5:25pm Tue 28 Feb 12
the butler
says...
5:34pm Tue 28 Feb 12
yorkborn66
says...
5:35pm Tue 28 Feb 12
Caecilius wrote:The vast majority of congestion is caused around school times. All the children and teenagers need to be at school by 8.45 / 9.00 and leave from 1500 to 1530.
The fundamental problem here is exactly the same one that's at the root of all the congestion in and around York. There's a finite amount of space available on the roads and it's not enough to accommodate all the vehicles that people want to put on them. And, typically, a proportion of motorists offload the consequences of their choice to use a car onto other people, by ignoring parking restrictions, ploughing up verges and generally demonstrating their contempt for everyone else's interests.
I would love to, but will not bleat about the good old days but at least then they was enough schools to accommodate the population of York without the need of a car. It is a fact when the kids are not at school how easy it is to commute around York. How many schools have closed over the years in York? . The problem lies with why people need to commute by car at a certain point in the day. Until this is fully understood and addressed the problem will only get worse.
I am sure everyone would love to go green and be environmentally friendly, but until we have a realistic affordable transport policy and local amenities and schools this will never happen. There were more schools and amenities in 1970 in York than they are now, is this progress?
GoodDoc
says...
5:58pm Tue 28 Feb 12
.
And 'Pedalling Paul', I realise that you principally come here to get a rise, but I'm just checking you don't seriously expect all teachers to move to the same neighbourhood as their school. That would be laughable, after-all, wouldn't it? Shall we all live within walking distance of our jobs? Or is it just education staff you want to single out?
.
Wow, I've really fed the trolls today.
McArthur Crown
says...
6:09pm Tue 28 Feb 12
I live around the corner from this school but weren't given places here - we're not catholics. We often walk our kids up to Poppleton Road school without complaint, even though we have a car.
pedalling paul
says...
10:41pm Tue 28 Feb 12
GoodDoc wrote:Actually I heard from one teacher that living in the same catchment area as their pupils could endanger the safety of the teacher and their house in some circumstances....... hence an instinctive tendency to live further afield and become car dependant.
Very amusing 'Pete'. Coming from a wannabe-builder who claims it impossible to work when it's cold, I won't take your criticism too seriously. The frequency of your posts on here shows just how hard you work.
.
And 'Pedalling Paul', I realise that you principally come here to get a rise, but I'm just checking you don't seriously expect all teachers to move to the same neighbourhood as their school. That would be laughable, after-all, wouldn't it? Shall we all live within walking distance of our jobs? Or is it just education staff you want to single out?
.
Wow, I've really fed the trolls today.
yorkshirelad
says...
10:46pm Tue 28 Feb 12
But how much are we generally as a community to blame?
What is our reaction when speed controls are suggested that might make our childrens walking/cycling route to school safer?
What is our reaction when someone suggests more cycle lanes to make cycling safer for our children ...and make us a bit more like other European countries?
Well...look no further than the responses to this currently in the news pages for an idea...
http://www.yorkpress
.co.uk/news/9555325.
MP_in_cycle_lanes_ta
x_break_plea/
Ultimately if we create a community in which it is hostile for children to walk/cycle to school then we pay the price...
Your choice...
yorkshirelad
says...
10:48pm Tue 28 Feb 12
If the children did it they'd be in real trouble!
marvell
says...
1:35am Wed 29 Feb 12
"Coun Janet Looker, City of York Council’s head of Education, Children and Young People’s Services, said she had not been made aware of the problem at Our Lady Queen of Martyrs"
There was a MAJOR half hour discussion at the Holgate Ward Committee with Cllr's Alexander, Crisp and Riches about exactly this.
Residents turned up to discuss this with their Labour councillors and you're telling me that the Cabinet member directly responsible for this issue has not been made aware of this?
Either Cllr Looker is not up to her job and should resign or she has not had the Holgate feedback given to her or she is lying...
Which is it...
mortandindi
says...
7:33am Wed 29 Feb 12
desmond tiblets
says...
9:21am Wed 29 Feb 12
YorkPatrol wrote:All the residents of Harlow road especially near the puss and boots are sick of the mayhem caused by lazy parents dropping there kids off.this once proud street is now over run with chavs parking anywhere
“A SURGE in the number of parents dropping off and picking up their children at a York primary school has turned the street into a “battlefield” according to nearby residents”
Really, a Battlefield?? Do the parents dive out of their cars and take cover whilst lobbing grenades into the resident’s gardens, are snipers stationed at key strategic points to infiltrate the school leavers with the teachers using drones to take out the lollypop lady?
The ages of the “2” complaining residents says it all – busy body, curtain twitches with nothing else letter to do. If they had anything about them, they set up a business charging for the use of their drive spaces
gurgles
says...
9:31am Wed 29 Feb 12
Rockmamma
says...
10:26am Wed 29 Feb 12
yorklover
says...
10:36am Wed 29 Feb 12
pedalling paul wrote:Why should staff live near the school? Should nurses buy houses next to a hospital, Tesco workers live near the superstore? What a ridiculous comment!
There seems to be a reluctance by many school staff to live close to their workplace. Also parents do not have to send their kids to the school nearest where they choose to live. So a lot of lifestyle decisions are being made which create car dependancy. Even where offspring live within practicable walking or cycling distance, there is a reluctance by some parents to let their offspring travel under their own steam. Green travel plans, walking buses, safe cycle routes and training all help to damp down this trend and CoYC is in the "top tier" of Local Authorities who promote these alternative choices. Past attitudes may be summarised in a cartoon picture that I saw. A school run mum was pointing to a cyclist that she'd just flattened while saying to her son "See, I told you the roads aren't safe to pedal on!"
It's the parents that need to re- think whether their kids could walkk to school with a friend if necessary. Any child aged 9 and over should be able to walk, if not younger if very near. My son walks half an hour to school. It's great exercise and gives him independence.
However I have to say the private schools create the most traffic. You can sail down Bootham when St Peter's and Bootham are on holiday!
jadestars
says...
11:48am Wed 29 Feb 12
YorkPatrol
says...
12:10pm Wed 29 Feb 12
desmond tiblets wrote:I think you need to go back to school judging by your grammar and spelling…
YorkPatrol wrote: “A SURGE in the number of parents dropping off and picking up their children at a York primary school has turned the street into a “battlefield” according to nearby residents” Really, a Battlefield?? Do the parents dive out of their cars and take cover whilst lobbing grenades into the resident’s gardens, are snipers stationed at key strategic points to infiltrate the school leavers with the teachers using drones to take out the lollypop lady? The ages of the “2” complaining residents says it all – busy body, curtain twitches with nothing else letter to do. If they had anything about them, they set up a business charging for the use of their drive spacesAll the residents of Harlow road especially near the puss and boots are sick of the mayhem caused by lazy parents dropping there kids off.this once proud street is now over run with chavs parking anywhere
Don’t be parking outside though!
groble
says...
12:24pm Wed 29 Feb 12
Even AndyD
says...
12:44pm Wed 29 Feb 12
Residents....well come on, you live near a school. Its only a few minutes a day for 8 months a year.
Problem with society today is its always the other person's fault.
desmond tiblets
says...
1:02pm Wed 29 Feb 12
YorkPatrol wrote:Sorry miss.didn't know you were a teacher at the school.will slap my own bottom
desmond tiblets wrote:I think you need to go back to school judging by your grammar and spelling…
YorkPatrol wrote: “A SURGE in the number of parents dropping off and picking up their children at a York primary school has turned the street into a “battlefield” according to nearby residents” Really, a Battlefield?? Do the parents dive out of their cars and take cover whilst lobbing grenades into the resident’s gardens, are snipers stationed at key strategic points to infiltrate the school leavers with the teachers using drones to take out the lollypop lady? The ages of the “2” complaining residents says it all – busy body, curtain twitches with nothing else letter to do. If they had anything about them, they set up a business charging for the use of their drive spacesAll the residents of Harlow road especially near the puss and boots are sick of the mayhem caused by lazy parents dropping there kids off.this once proud street is now over run with chavs parking anywhere
Don’t be parking outside though!
Mary Donne
says...
1:31pm Wed 29 Feb 12
mortandindi wrote:Nothing to do with working mothers having to drop the kids off first before driving to their jobs then?
If you think thats bad you want to try Church Lane, Bishopthorpe twice a day, the mothers don't like to walk for more than 10 yards. lazy people in the extreme.
Oh and most kids have two parents who could be dropping them off at school - but let's not let that get in the way of chucking a bit of vitriol at the female of the species, eh?
Clickclick
says...
1:46pm Wed 29 Feb 12
old_geezer
says...
2:42pm Wed 29 Feb 12
If I had to drop a child off for this school, I'd do so a couple of hundred yards away rather than face conditions as described. If safe, the child could walk the rest; if not, I'd spend a few minutes parking then walking with them.
cthomas79
says...
12:37pm Fri 2 Mar 12
Gramayre
says...
6:58pm Fri 2 Mar 12
If folks moan about the distance they have to travel to school, I had to catch a bus on Bishy Road at 6.50am to go to Taddy. When schools are extended/built nowadays they should include parking for parents to drop off or negotiate parking in local car parks (either council or pubs) and get parents to walk a bit.
Steve,
says...
3:12pm Sat 3 Mar 12
Lazy parents and snobs on the street.
2 solutions:
The snobs charge the drivers for parking there on a weekly basis and hit them in the wallet or obstruct their own drives and force the parents to go somewhere else.
I used to bike or walk to school and there was bike racks available on site.. it's because parents want to drop their kids 'safely' at the door, but the reality is this teaches them no road sense - let them flipping walk and grow up understanding that convenience costs, how much do parents spend xtra in fuel doing these runs? surely that would pay for family luxuries and days out worth the mileage rather than school runs?
long distance depressive says...
9:41am Tue 28 Feb 12