News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Pest control costs soar in York

THE cost of calling in pest controllers to tackle rat problems in York homes is set to soar by 283 per cent.

City of York Council is proposing to put up the fee for a pest controller to deal with rats in domestic properties from £15 to £57 as part of its drive to cut costs and raise revenue.

But Independent councillor Mark Warters has branded the proposal “absolutely appalling”, claiming it will put people off calling the pest control service and lead to a huge increase in rat problems across the city.

Coun Warters claimed there would be a particular upsurge in vermin in wards such as his own, Osbaldwick, which was criss-crossed by watercourses and dykes.

Coun Warters said pest control had originally been a free service, but the former Liberal Democrat administration had then introduced a nominal charge which many people would have been willing to pay. But he believed the new cost would prove a real deterrent to many householders.

Labour Cabinet Member for Communities and Neighbourhoods, Coun. Dafydd Williams said: “A review of the pest control service highlighted the service is running at a loss, as well as having an imbalance in the rates charged for dealing with rats and other pests. For rats, the charge is significantly lower than most councils. So what we are doing is equalising the charge for this service with those for all other pest control services, such as bedbugs, mice and cockroaches.

“The second reason is that record funding cuts from Government means the service can no longer be subsidised from the council’s central budget. The legal responsibility for keeping a property free of mice and rats sits with property owners; a council’s duty is only to ensure property owners fulfil that legal responsibility.

“Many other councils are stopping the operation of what is a non-statutory service, but we have chosen not to go down that route.

“These changes will ensure the service breaks even for the first time ever.”

Comments(6)

pedalling paul says...
10:19am Thu 9 Feb 12

Predictable comments awaited, about pests that need to be controlled.....

ISeeEverything says...
10:23am Thu 9 Feb 12

"“A review of the pest control service highlighted the service is running at a loss" Don't all council services run at a loss? That's why they are provided by the council, rather than a private company. The schools in York must loose a fortune each year, and the parks, and the libraries......

Pete the Brickie says...
12:21pm Thu 9 Feb 12



Labour Cabinet Member for Communities and Neighbourhoods, Coun. Dafydd Williams said:

“These changes will ensure the service breaks even for the first time ever.”



Luckily you are not running your own business Daffyd as what you've done here is commercial suicide. As you will probably discover putting up your charges by nearly 300% is not the best way to maintain customer numbers therefore your assumption that the service will "break even" by this method is rather flawed. My prediction is a loss in income with your costs remaining the same.

Prob says...
12:45pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Maybe if they bothered to collect the bins that have been sitting out on my street since Monday...

Smiler says...
1:38pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Prob wrote:
Maybe if they bothered to collect the bins that have been sitting out on my street since Monday...
I agree.

If it is the householders responsibility to ensure their property is vermin free, then perhaps we should all keep our smelly two week old rubbish filled wheelybins in the street on council property.

we should all get rentakill in and bill the council.

velvetdixie says...
11:47pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Now, now...rats make GOOD neighbors and have wonderfully appealing personalities once one gets to know them. That's why so many are elected to public office.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree