News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Protest at Haxby and Wigginton health centre over private treatments

A PROTEST is to be held outside a York health centre which told patients they would have to go private for some minor treatments.

Haxby and Wigginton Health Centre sparked controversy last week when it wrote to about 30 people saying the NHS would no longer fund procedures such as treating warts, cysts and ingrowing toenails.

The centre provided a price list for the treatments through HBG Limited, in which it has a shareholding, but defended the letters by saying it had acted in patients’ “best interests” and they were given other companies’ details. However, the issue has raised fears over “backdoor privatisation” of the NHS as the House of Lords prepares to debate potential Government health reforms today.

The Socialist Health Association will stage a protest rally outside the surgery tomorrow evening, with director Martin Rathfelder saying he was “disgusted and outraged” at the letters and demanding an investigation.

“It represents a clear conflict of interest between those charged with looking after the nation’s health and the commercial interests of private healthcare providers,” he said.

The Unite union’s national officer for health, Rachael Maskell, said: ‘Serious questions have to be asked about the use of data collected for NHS purposes, now being used for energetic marketing.

“The impression being given is that these services are no longer available on the NHS. This may be a sad fact of life for this practice, but there are other areas of the country where these procedures are available on the NHS.”

NHS North Yorkshire and York’s medical director, David Geddes, has expressed “significant concerns” over the letters, but the practice’s managing partner, John McEvoy, said no patients had complained and 15 of those who were written to had said they would go private for the procedures.

The Press - Comment

Creeping fears of NHS reforms

THE taxpayer-funded NHS was always supposed to be “free at the point of delivery.”

It hasn’t been that for some time: just look at prescription charges, and the cost of going to your dentist. Nevertheless, treatment on the NHS is, at least, heavily subsidised. It continues to provide an essential lifeline and reassurance for those who need it.

There are those who fear, however, that the Government’s health reforms will lead towards creeping privatisation of the NHS by the back door. The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, is among them. Speaking at the weekend he warned that the health reforms would see the NHS become “market-led or commercialised”. He called for a debate on the issue, adding: “You cannot compare an NHS Hospital to a supermarket.”

There are those who see evidence of just such creeping privatisation in the case of the Haxby and Wigginton health centre, which wrote to patients saying the NHS would no longer fund procedures such as treatments for warts and ingrowing toenails, and included with its letter a pricelist for treatment. The centre has defended its action, saying it acted in patients’ best interests, and pointing out that it gave details of other companies which offered the procedures.

But in a way, that is precisely the kind of “supermarket” NHS the Archbishop warned of.

Tomorrow, the Socialist Health Association will stage a protest rally outside the clinic.

It is probably unfair to target this particular health centre, however. It is only reacting to a changing ethos within the NHS.

At least now we can have a full and frank debate about how and how much we are all willing to pay for our NHS, before it is too late.

What do you think? - Click to comment

Comments(13)

ISeeEverything says...
10:15am Tue 11 Oct 11

I suspect Haxby will have never seen anything like it. A few scruffy socialists waving placards.

OwenC says...
12:46pm Tue 11 Oct 11

Please don't be put off by the term 'Socialist Health organisation'. The SHO is a Labour Party group whose leader is based in Manchester.

This protest is actually being organised by two non-party-political York-based groups - Defend Our NHS York and York Stop the Cuts.

You don't have to be a socialist to see that paying for healthcare is the opposite of what the NHS is supposed to represent.

What is happening in Haxby is the thin end of the wedge. Remember when Tony Blair introduced 'minimal' tuition fees? 15 years later and our Universities are more expensive than state Universities in the United States. No matter how the current proposals are justified as being negligible, they are destroying the principles of free health care. Once that has gone then greater and greater privatization will follow.

You may or may not be a socialist or a Labour Party member. That is irrelevant. If you believe in the basic fundamental principles of health care being available to all citizens no matter what their income, then please please come along to this protest! And bring your granny and aunty Dot and nephews, friends and cousins as well!

Priapus says...
1:51pm Tue 11 Oct 11

The Socialist Health Association should team up with the Socialist Workers Party. Then there'd be two people at the protest.

Theendoftheworld says...
2:15pm Tue 11 Oct 11

Priapus - if you're wealthy enough to pay for your healtcare, good luck to you. If not, don't mock those who are trying to help those who are less fortunate than you.

Aeroman says...
2:18pm Tue 11 Oct 11

I think that the demonstration would be better directed at the PCT or Department of Health rather than the practice who are continuing to offer a service where the PCT have apparently withdrawn funding from certain minor surgical procedures. The alternative to paying for a procedure, in this case, is not to have it performed. From what I have read the practice have written to specific patients, who were presumably on a waiting list for a minor operation, to inform them that NHS funding is no longer available and to offer them several alternatives, one of which is to have their operation done by one of the GP surgeons from the practice but under the auspices of HBG Ltd, which is outside the NHS, as is necessary under the terms of their NHS contract. It is ridiculous to suggest that GPs should not use their own records as a resource to permit them to inform their patients of such changes. I am sure there has been no infringement of the Data Protection Act as had been suggested in earlier discussion of this matter.

In writing to specific patients the practice was updating them and offering several alternatives including the conveniently local service offered by HBG Ltd, the cost of which would be a fraction of a referral to a private consultant. I think they should be applauded for their pro-activity and consideration of their patients and not made scapegoats for the failings of the NHS and PCT.

Micklegate says...
3:11pm Tue 11 Oct 11

It is not the 'thin end of the wedge', there never has and never will be a day when all health services are free (whether treatments deemed too expensive, too cosmetic or just prescription charges etc). This is merely a case of an idiotic Labour government spent all the money and then a load more than was never there and now we have to make tough choices and people must pay for skin tags to be removed so that people can have cancer treatment for free.

Digeorge says...
3:46pm Tue 11 Oct 11

I agree with Aeroman, what a waste of time - better directed at the PCT and Department of Health.

Don't forget that the Labour Government also have layers and layers of junior/middle management to wade through (heaven knows what they do!) and is also a total waste of money that would be better spent directing the money to fund treatments for patients.

Hope you enjoyed standing in the rain because that is what it seems to amount to.

OwenC says...
3:53pm Tue 11 Oct 11

It's absolutely not about scapegoating but about raising awareness of this issue.

The Haxby practice has jumped the gun and become the centre of national media attention. However, such decisions will become commonplace all over the land if the govt's bill goes through.

Please sign this emergency petition, which currently has 73 thousand names and counting:

http://www.38degrees
.org.uk/page/s/nhs-m
essage-to-the-lords#
petition

Hope to see lots of you there tomorrow, rain, hail or otherwise!

Theendoftheworld says...
4:04pm Tue 11 Oct 11

Good luck OwenC - ignore the tories on here!

OwenC says...
4:50pm Tue 11 Oct 11

Theendoftheworld wrote:
Good luck OwenC - ignore the tories on here!
Thank you!

Frodo Baggins says...
5:24pm Tue 11 Oct 11

Have the Haxby & Wigginton practice declared how much money they receive from their "referrals" to the private sector? Whatever the figure is I hope they are directing it back into the NHS to help those that cannot afford private treatment.

TheYorkRose says...
11:49pm Tue 11 Oct 11

For goodness sake, how heartless are these people?

The people who have to deal with ingrowing toenails, etc, are not always people who get them from idiocy. As well as tight-fitting shoes being a problem, excessive nail-cutting and *genetic susceptibility* are major reasons (and trauma by dropping things or playing sports), which can't be helped. To have to pay for that would be same as having to pay for treatment to a sprained ankle whilst jogging or for diabetic treatment for a genetic disorder.

i.e. extremely harsh. Those of us who pay taxes should be able to subsidise those who are poor and who do not deserve to pay these ridiculous fees for inexpensive treatments.

Susie B says...
8:06am Sat 15 Oct 11

The national treasure that is our NHS is not a bottomless pit. Like any tool of the nation it has to adapt to changing demands in order to survive. As we are able to do more medically for patients, and as we are becoming medically more demanding partially due to lifestyle issues, the pot is raided more often. As a consequence we have to prioritise. Not to do that would be irresponsible and unfair. What should be fair however is that everything is totally transparent and above board. We expect our NHS to be run by people who truly care, and not in it for profit. If these operations are being run in their own time, not in our NHS time and patients are being kept fully informed of all their options, then what is so different from the services run by current hospital consultants which, because it is set within our psyche, are accepted? I want to be looked after a medical professional who would always treat me intelligently, with my best interests at heart, but also we as a nation need to realise that we cannot go on ravaging the NHS purse without consequences. If this is the consequence and it is above board and in the best interests of the patients, not doctors then it may be a bit precient of the practice, but I suspect it is the future.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree