Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
News coverage for York, Ryedale, East Yorkshire, Harrogate and Selby.
Popular topics: Community Stadium | Snow | Germany Beck | ftr | Queen's visit | Council tax
12:00pm Monday 23rd August 2010 in
MORE than £100,000 of taxpayers’ money was spent on the European legal battle to save one of York’s largest and most controversial developments.
The full cost of City of York Council’s row with the European Commission over the 540-home Derwenthorpe model village scheme has been revealed following an investigation by The Press.
Documents obtained under the Audit Commission Act show the authority paid £60,787.94 to Leeds-based law firm Shulmans during the 2009/10 financial year for advice on the argument, on top of the £44,575 it forked out the year before.
The Commission became involved after the council sold the land to the Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust without going out to open tender, but said earlier this year that while the deal did not comply with European Union procurement rules, the case should not be referred to the European courts.
Seven invoices sent to the council by Shulmans between April last year and and February this year show the firm asked for payment for all meetings, train travel, taxi fares, mileage, parking, telephone calls and letters relating to the case. The heftiest invoice, sent out in July 2009, was for £24,061.94.
The council has said the Commission’s decision paves the way for Derwenthorpe to be built. The Trust will now invite tenders from companies across the European Union to bid for the construction of homes in four phases, but those opposing the scheme have vowed not to call off their attempts to block it.
“The possible implications of the European Commission’s rules were flagged up as far back as 2003 and were dismissed by the council,” said Mark Warters, who chairs Osbaldwick Parish Council and has been a leading campaigner against the model village proposals.
“It is regrettable that they have had to spend this money when they should have been fully aware of these rules back then. Perhaps they would not have needed to spend it if they had taken this issue more seriously.
“I also feel that senior council staff should have had the expertise to deal with this matter rather than the authority needing outside legal advice.”
Council leader Andrew Waller said: “The cost to the council of this legal advice is money which could otherwise have been used for public services in the city.
“As the Derwenthorpe case was setting a legal precedent, we could not do all the work in-house and so had to seek advice from a specialist legal team. Delays in responses by the UK Government and the European Commission all added to the costs, but we did all we could to speed things up to reach the final lifting of the case against York as quickly as possible.
“The council took legal advice in 2002 on handling the Derwenthorpe project and acted within the advice based on the understanding of EU procurement law at that time. Nobody could have predicted that, five years later, a court case in rural France would completely change the working of this part of procurement law and leave Derwenthorpe trapped in a legal case.
“The council’s difficult position was made worse by the way in which the European Commission will only talk to Government civil servants, and so York was often stuck in the middle without direct access to the people assessing the case.
“We made sure all the steps required of York were done quickly and reported to the European Commission and I also had to lobby Government ministers to speed up responses from civil servants. If that had not been done, we would have been landed with an even higher legal bill.”
Comments(23)
spiritofyork
says...
1:21pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Boatie
says...
1:47pm Mon 23 Aug 10
horatio churchill
says...
1:50pm Mon 23 Aug 10
hifive
says...
1:51pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Boatie wrote:Completely agree. I'm no supporter of Waller - quite the contrary in fact but in this case it's not his fault. Believe me, I'd be the first to comment if it was!
Let me make it clear I am not, or ever will be a Lib Dem Supporter, however this is not the fault Andrew Waller. This development has cost the Council an absolute fortune, mainly because the Parish Council chairman has used every perceived loophole to prevent the development of Derwenthorpe, land that was classified for housing 20 yrs ago. The type of housing intended for this site is desperately needed, the costs incurred by the City Council should be met by thr Parish Council not Council Tax payers as a whole.
horatio churchill
says...
2:06pm Mon 23 Aug 10
hifive wrote:Sorry guys this is down to Waller and his master Galloway. Pure and simple. They want all the glory but none of the flack.
Boatie wrote: Let me make it clear I am not, or ever will be a Lib Dem Supporter, however this is not the fault Andrew Waller. This development has cost the Council an absolute fortune, mainly because the Parish Council chairman has used every perceived loophole to prevent the development of Derwenthorpe, land that was classified for housing 20 yrs ago. The type of housing intended for this site is desperately needed, the costs incurred by the City Council should be met by thr Parish Council not Council Tax payers as a whole.Completely agree. I'm no supporter of Waller - quite the contrary in fact but in this case it's not his fault. Believe me, I'd be the first to comment if it was!
voiceoreason
says...
2:20pm Mon 23 Aug 10
horatio churchill
says...
2:27pm Mon 23 Aug 10
voiceoreason wrote:keep quoting the party line Nigel.
The dispute was between the EU and the UK government. York was just one of many authorities across the country that followed legal advice provided by the UK government. The EU questioned whether this advice was in fact correct. Check the facts, the Derwentthorpe matter was just one of many examples cited by the EU in their dispute with the UK government. It is a disgrace that York tax payers have to pay for what is merely a squabble between the then government and those in Brussels
spiritofyork
says...
2:43pm Mon 23 Aug 10
King Edward
says...
2:57pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Theendoftheworld
says...
2:59pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Minsterview
says...
3:59pm Mon 23 Aug 10
meme
says...
4:33pm Mon 23 Aug 10
hifive
says...
4:37pm Mon 23 Aug 10
horatio churchill wrote:What glory??? Nothing's happened thanks to the NIMBYs dragging their feet and the rule change! Nah, this is one of those rare occasions that Waller et al are not to blame....
hifive wrote:Sorry guys this is down to Waller and his master Galloway. Pure and simple. They want all the glory but none of the flack.Boatie wrote: Let me make it clear I am not, or ever will be a Lib Dem Supporter, however this is not the fault Andrew Waller. This development has cost the Council an absolute fortune, mainly because the Parish Council chairman has used every perceived loophole to prevent the development of Derwenthorpe, land that was classified for housing 20 yrs ago. The type of housing intended for this site is desperately needed, the costs incurred by the City Council should be met by thr Parish Council not Council Tax payers as a whole.Completely agree. I'm no supporter of Waller - quite the contrary in fact but in this case it's not his fault. Believe me, I'd be the first to comment if it was!
gerry merryweather
says...
4:45pm Mon 23 Aug 10
2oldies
says...
4:46pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Boatie wrote:In my view the Parish Council has been used for years by a few NIMBY's to prevent this development. And Osbaldwick parishioners were also billed an extra £10,000 on their precept the year of the Inquiry. Most have little interest in Derwenthorpe. Please do not suggest we should pay more.
Let me make it clear I am not, or ever will be a Lib Dem Supporter, however this is not the fault Andrew Waller. This development has cost the Council an absolute fortune, mainly because the Parish Council chairman has used every perceived loophole to prevent the development of Derwenthorpe, land that was classified for housing 20 yrs ago. The type of housing intended for this site is desperately needed, the costs incurred by the City Council should be met by thr Parish Council not Council Tax payers as a whole.
pedalling paul
says...
5:20pm Mon 23 Aug 10
The Ludovician
says...
6:51pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Boatie
says...
8:09pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Cost Accountant
says...
11:15pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Cost Accountant
says...
11:15pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Cold_as_Christmas
says...
11:51pm Mon 23 Aug 10
Yosser Hughes
says...
7:09am Tue 24 Aug 10
pedalling paul wrote:I wish your father had been sterilised then you wouldnt be posting irrelevent comments like this
The alternative is to sterilise the population, or reduce it drastically with a nuclear war. Then we won't have any demand for this housing. At least, if it's built, it will be within easy pedalling distance of York, via the Foss Island offroad route. So an inducement for some sustainable travel.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Looking for a new career? Find a job in York and all around North Yorkshire
Search Now »
Love and friendship - find your perfect match.
Search Now »
Find properties for sale and rent in and around York.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale all over Yorkshire and the North.
Search Now »
Yosser Hughes says...
12:51pm Mon 23 Aug 10