Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
News coverage for York, Ryedale, East Yorkshire, Harrogate and Selby.
Popular topics: Community Stadium | Snow | Germany Beck | ftr | Queen's visit | Council tax
8:39am Monday 5th July 2010 in
OPPOSITION councillors in York have performed a U-turn over how a new swimming pool for the city should be funded.
City of York Council’s Labour group originally intended to oppose an extra £1 million of public money being invested in plans to create an eight-lane, 25-metre facility at the University of York’s Heslington East campus extension.
But its members are now set to give “qualified support” to the scheme when the funding issue is discussed by the authority’s executive tomorrow, although they say they also remain committed to the return of a city centre pool. The council agreed to provide £2 million towards the £8.9 million York Sports Village pool in 2007 and is now expected to approve borrowing the additional cash, with the university taking responsibility for running and maintaining the facility during its first 25 years.
Labour’s leisure spokesperson Coun Sonja Crisp said: “We have given this a great deal of consideration and believe it is the only way forward in the current climate, while retaining our full commitment to a city centre pool.
“We are doing the responsible thing in supporting publicly-accessible swimming provision when it is so badly needed.
“The critical factor is that the legal agreement is right and both the university and the council know exactly what to expect over the first 25 years of the pool’s life.”
Labour leader Coun James Alexander met the university’s pro vice-chancellor, Elizabeth Heaps, last week to seek assurances on his party’s concerns about the pool, and Coun Crisp said some of those fears, including disabled toilet provision, public access, pricing and transport, had been allayed.
“We are aware of a campaign by a Heslington resident to improve the conditions of access for the public and we fully support that campaign,” she said.
She said Labour’s commitment to a city centre pool remained “unwavering”.
A GRADUATE of the University of York is campaigning for cast-iron assurances that any swimming pool built in Heslington will be open to the whole community.
David Levene, 21, has launched a Facebook page and has contacted councillors and university bosses in an attempt to secure public use for the planned facility.
He said: “It would have been great to use such a facility while I was a student. I have launched a campaign to push for the pool and I am seeking greater guarantees from the university over community access.”
Mr Levene, a former Wakefield resident who intends to make his home in York, said he believed community access was “the right thing to do and could make the project more viable”.
His Facebook group, called SOS: Save Our Swimming! Campaign For A Heslington Swimming Pool, has about 50 members.
The former sociology student has written to Elizabeth Heaps, University of York pro vice chancellor for estates, and he showed The Press an email response in which she said the swimming pool had “been planned all along to provide access to the community.”
He described the reply as “positive”.
Comments(18)
Theendoftheworld
says...
11:18am Mon 5 Jul 10
LibDem
says...
11:58am Mon 5 Jul 10
Minsterview
says...
12:18pm Mon 5 Jul 10
James Alexander
says...
12:28pm Mon 5 Jul 10
Minsterview
says...
1:37pm Mon 5 Jul 10
Unctuous
says...
1:53pm Mon 5 Jul 10
Minsterview wrote:When you use terms like "less than great" you simply appear childish. Surprised you haven't figured this out for yourself.
So "less than great", you are going to vote in favour of the proposal on 15th July when I understand it will be discussed by the Council? No equivocation? No last minute change of heart?
Minsterview
says...
2:25pm Mon 5 Jul 10
PKH
says...
3:14pm Mon 5 Jul 10
LibDem wrote:It was YOU who had closed the pool and liesure facilities at the Barbican and were relying on the disaster Absolute Liesure, with a change of use for the centre. And before you say it was Labour who put it out to tender, Labour also put the facilities out to tend at Monks Cross the big difference is Labour insured they were still there. We will you be grown up and admit you made mistakes, instead of trying to blame everyone else.
Dear End. If Labour had supported the Barbican project in 2005 there would be a new pool and leisure centre there now. Just more flip flopping and indecision from your Labour pals
billy shears
says...
6:33pm Mon 5 Jul 10
LibDem wrote:Lib Dums can blame no one for the Barbican fiasco but themselves. It was their greed and mis management.
Dear End. If Labour had supported the Barbican project in 2005 there would be a new pool and leisure centre there now. Just more flip flopping and indecision from your Labour pals
Lizzie Browning
says...
6:40pm Mon 5 Jul 10
mary poppins21
says...
6:47pm Mon 5 Jul 10
billy shears
says...
6:57pm Mon 5 Jul 10
keepitshut
says...
9:01pm Mon 5 Jul 10
m dee
says...
10:09pm Mon 5 Jul 10
E Dickinson
says...
11:05pm Mon 5 Jul 10
corporal jones
says...
11:58am Tue 6 Jul 10
E Dickinson wrote:Don't believe a word Galloway says. Had the misfortune once to call him re a local matter that was in his ward. Didn't want to know told me to sod off and slammed the phone down on me. He wonders why folks can't stand him.
Lib Dem states "Why would anyone start an apparently spurious Facebook page to press for something which is already guaranteed?" Perhaps the answer to Cllr Galloways question lies in the fact that the guarantee is given by himself! Lest we forget and contrary to Lib Dem propaganda! it was Cllr Galloway ,when seeking election !who guaranteed a replacement swimming pool on the Barbican site and then, on the run in to the following election when he was Council Leader, broke this promise without consultation, and transferred the bulk of the Barbican proceeds to his own ward, Believe Lib Dems promises on swimming in York? I should cocoa mates!
keepitshut
says...
5:42pm Tue 6 Jul 10
corporal jones wrote:Hmmmm, i find that very difficult to believe, isnt there a code of practice for councillors to adhere to?
E Dickinson wrote: Lib Dem states "Why would anyone start an apparently spurious Facebook page to press for something which is already guaranteed?" Perhaps the answer to Cllr Galloways question lies in the fact that the guarantee is given by himself! Lest we forget and contrary to Lib Dem propaganda! it was Cllr Galloway ,when seeking election !who guaranteed a replacement swimming pool on the Barbican site and then, on the run in to the following election when he was Council Leader, broke this promise without consultation, and transferred the bulk of the Barbican proceeds to his own ward, Believe Lib Dems promises on swimming in York? I should cocoa mates!Don't believe a word Galloway says. Had the misfortune once to call him re a local matter that was in his ward. Didn't want to know told me to sod off and slammed the phone down on me. He wonders why folks can't stand him.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Looking for a new career? Find a job in York and all around North Yorkshire
Search Now »
Love and friendship - find your perfect match.
Search Now »
Find properties for sale and rent in and around York.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale all over Yorkshire and the North.
Search Now »
LibDem says...
9:10am Mon 5 Jul 10
But even more curious is the implication that the public access terms have in some way changed since the proposal was published on the Councils web site 10 days ago. The report clearly sets out the arrangements for public access including for those with disabilities. Why would anyone start an apparently spurious Facebook page to press for something which is already guaranteed?
To quote from the report to be considered tomorrow by the Councils Executive:
“York Sports Village Swimming Pool – Overarching Principles
The swimming pool facility will:
• Be accessible to all York citizens and members of the University, including club use
• Encourage participation by promoting the benefits of a healthy active lifestyle
• Provide facilities for a range of abilities and actively encourage participation by all members of the communities
• Promote use by people with disabilities
• Be designed and maintained as a high quality environment
• Have a flexible charging and admissions policy that promotes the maximum use of the facilities during the day and encourages widening participation
• Be financially self-sufficient including an allowance for sufficient ongoing maintenance and renewal
• Have an independent identity
It will meet the city’s need for short course competition standard facility and will provide a comprehensive publicly accessible programme covering clubs, general swimming, schools, classes, family sessions, targeted sessions, and galas.