News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


News coverage for York, Ryedale, East Yorkshire, Harrogate and Selby.

Popular topics: Community Stadium | Snow | Germany Beck | ftr | Queen's visit | Council tax


Hi-tech flood barrier in Clementhorpe to be replaced by sandbags


A HI-TECH York flood defence scheme is set to make way for the trusty sandbag – because it could be a safety risk.

The trial of a barrier designed to protect homes against rising water at the junction of Clementhorpe and Terry Avenue is expected to come to an end after water seeped under it and caused the road surface to rise up.

City officials say it could lead to a “sudden and catastrophic” road collapse, and have called for it to be scrapped.

The problems were spotted when the system, adopted on a trial basis by City of York Council and put in place by Aquabarrier Systems, was called into action during floods in September 2008 and water began leaking through the defences.

Now the pilot scheme is set to be abandoned when the council’s executive meets next Tuesday after “serious reservations” were raised.

Instead, the council is expected to provide a sandbag “bund” across Clementhorpe if further floods arise while talks are held with the Environment Agency about potential permanent schemes.

The Aquabarrier was trialled at “minimal cost” to the council, but residents in nearby River Street were amazed when it was not used during floods last December.

A report on the scheme said: “The barrier is designed to hold back up to 1.5 metres, in height, of water, and at this level the belief is that there is a significant risk of road failure on the property side of the barrier which could be sudden and catastrophic, also potentially affecting the stability of public utility pipes and cables.

“Clearly, such a failure and the subsequent upward flow of water could be dangerous to any person in the vicinity and will, as a minimum, mean the barrier is thereafter ineffective.”

It also said the amount of water seeping through was more than Aquabarrier had expected and now posed health and safety risks.

Council leader Andrew Waller said: “There is a lot of medieval landfill in this area which means it does not behave like other parts of the river bank, and that is why there has been seepage.

“Whatever is decided next week, we will be approaching the Environment Agency about what can be done in this part of the city, but there would need to be significant investment in the sewage system.”

Comments(8)

metsa says...
11:42am Tue 9 Mar 10

Can't say I'm a particular fan of Mr Waller or his administration- but isn't this exactly the point of a pilot project. You test something out, if it works you continue with it, if it fails you look for an alternative solution. Presumably, all other parties would have done something similar?

keepsgettingbanned says...
12:02pm Tue 9 Mar 10

metsa wrote:
Can't say I'm a particular fan of Mr Waller or his administration- but isn't this exactly the point of a pilot project. You test something out, if it works you continue with it, if it fails you look for an alternative solution. Presumably, all other parties would have done something similar?
Yes, thats a fair point. Perhaps their salesman wasnt as persuasive as the chap flogging the LED driver information signs!

bugg says...
12:50pm Tue 9 Mar 10

As a resident of Clementhorpe - i'm not against sandbags - just so long as they manage to put them in before the river gets too high and take them away once the river is back where it should be! Not 2 or 3 days later.
There are only 3 ways in and 2 ways out of Clementhorpe for vehicles - it can be a nightmare at times when the Terry avenue exit is closed - especially when cars entering the shops area of Bishopthorpe Road insist on stopping in the yellow box near the Swan pub when the traffic is built up.

Whistlejacket says...
1:19pm Tue 9 Mar 10

There seems to be more to this than we are being told.
The Aqua Barrier is just a series of interlocking plastic tanks which fill with flood water and thus have zero bouyancy, hence no extra load on the road below.
The alternative solution, to use large sandbags, would put extra load onto the road surface since sand is almost twice as dense as water. Additionally, the sand bag barrier will always have to be higher than the anticipated maximum flood level to provide a safety margin, while the aqua barrier fills and empties naturally as the flood water level changes.
The sub-surface seepage mentioned in the article will be unaffected whatever type of surface barrier is used.
Is the real issue a licencing fee? Or perhaps a perceived opportunity to get more money out of central government for a "gold-plated" solution?

kennydebs says...
3:12pm Tue 9 Mar 10

I'm not a great fan of York City Council or its officers. But I must say if Dave Merrit can walk on water he cant be all that bad.(or can he)

metsa says...
3:14pm Tue 9 Mar 10

Slightly surprised to see the initial email which I was replying to has been removed! I disagreed with its content, which was why I was making my comment, but it didn't contain anything that warranted censoring. It was splenetic but not offensive!

TooRad says...
9:06pm Tue 9 Mar 10

metsa wrote:
Slightly surprised to see the initial email which I was replying to has been removed! I disagreed with its content, which was why I was making my comment, but it didn't contain anything that warranted censoring. It was splenetic but not offensive!
You know the Press are very inconsistent with their censorship. Sometimes it seems draconian, sometimes it's not there at all.
I guess you could surmise that every now and then head office or whoever send off a missive detailing too much bad language or whatever and the folks have to comply.
So every now and then, and just for a day, posts from all and sundry disappear regardless of merit, in a 'just makin up the numbers guv' type way.
.
Luckily I understand this so I'm not going to kick off about the story below losing its comments and I won't waste my time going into a diatribe about truth being out of style, cos god knows the comments on that story were to the point and not at all slanderous and yet - poof - they're gone.
.
Oh happy days are here again la di da dah da dah da di dah etc

InstantSandbags says...
4:55pm Fri 12 Mar 10

Flooding is not easy to predict. The best defence is planning and multiple methods of protection.

Each road or house will face a different challenge. In my experience, spending a small amount of money on door barriers and air brick covers can make a big difference.

Using Sand filled sandbags is the worst answer to flooding (see the Pitt Report for evidence). I am biased, but Instant Sandbags are better as they can be stored at the house and inflate in 5 minutes.

Sand filled sandbags are bad for the environment, difficult to deploy and leak!

Large immobile flood barriers are expensive and water will always surprise you. My company is working on a new portable flood barrier and would love to hear from all parties about what would make it the best solution. I cannot say to much, but it is made from recycled material, is portable and can defend one house or a whole street.

Please remember that Flooding will effect 1 in 6 homes in the UK and we need to do more to prepare.

My company offers free advice and local experts on 0845 0945623

Happy to help any local residents and we will give you an honest answer rather than an expensive product.

Sean Reel
www.instantsandbags.
com


Councillor Dave Merrett talks to resident Margaret Bunce in flooded River Street Coun Dave Merrett talks to resident Margaret Bunce in flooded River Street in December

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses