Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
10:41am Saturday 26th December 2009
DEVELOPERS are planning to build an extension to Monks Cross Shopping Centre in a multi-million-pound project that could create dozens of jobs for York.
They want to expand the centre at its western side, just off the Jockey Lane/Monks Cross Drive roundabout, to make space for Carphone Warehouse and a mystery furniture chain.
As well as the new shop of about 1,160 square metres, they also plan to install a mezzanine floor in an existing building, and add a new food and drink area, between Debenhams and Starbucks.
But the move would lead to a loss of some parking spaces and the children’s play area, which has sparked opposition.
Planning consultancy Indigo, which is representing Monks Cross management, said officials were in advanced talks with the two potential clients and said there were no other suitable sites in York. Management at the shopping park have been in talks with City of York Council over the project for 18 months.
A spokeswoman said the development would have an annual turnover of about £4.3 million and would create 70 full and part-time jobs, as well as construction work.
A statement supporting a planning application said the proposals would provide a “modern, high-quality development” that would enhance the overall area.
Huntington Parish Council has objected to the plans though, saying they would exacerbate existing traffic and parking problems at the centre, and the city council’s own city development team has also raised some concerns.
Their officer Rebecca Harrison said the limited use of the playpark may be due to its design, location and lack of maintenance, and said the developers should provide a new one as part of their plans. She also said restrictions should be imposed, to prevent the new shop being broken up into multiple units and to ensure only food and drink were sold from the smaller outlets, but did not formally object to the plans.
The Environment Agency has objected, however, saying the developers have not presented an adequate flood risk assessment, while the council’s landscape architect Esther Priestley has raised concerns over the loss of trees around the edge of the shopping park. The application is due to be decided upon by the city council next month.
Gresmit, York says...
1:13pm Sat 26 Dec 09
pedalling paul wrote:I agree with Pedalling Paul. Why not encourage more development in the city centre? Monk's Cross is just an amorphous retail jumble with no character and I avoid it as far as possible.
Quote from the DfT Planning Policy Guidance no 13 (PPG13) on Planning and Transport. "By shaping the pattern of development and influencing the location, scale, density, design and mix of land uses, planning can help to reduce the need to travel, reduce the length of journeys and make it safer and easier for people to access jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling. Consistent application of these planning policies will help to reduce some of the need for car journeys (by reducing the physical separation of key land uses) and enable people to make sustainable transport choices." So why increase car- dependant developments? Or are the developers to make a section 106 contribution to help develop sustainable travel inn the area.
roclank2000, York says...
2:09pm Sat 26 Dec 09
dubber, york says...
2:17pm Sat 26 Dec 09
The Cat Amongst The Pigeons, Ye Olde Citee of Yorke says...
3:42pm Sat 26 Dec 09
Gresmit wrote:Where?
pedalling paul wrote:I agree with Pedalling Paul. Why not encourage more development in the city centre? Monk's Cross is just an amorphous retail jumble with no character and I avoid it as far as possible.
Quote from the DfT Planning Policy Guidance no 13 (PPG13) on Planning and Transport. "By shaping the pattern of development and influencing the location, scale, density, design and mix of land uses, planning can help to reduce the need to travel, reduce the length of journeys and make it safer and easier for people to access jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling. Consistent application of these planning policies will help to reduce some of the need for car journeys (by reducing the physical separation of key land uses) and enable people to make sustainable transport choices." So why increase car- dependant developments? Or are the developers to make a section 106 contribution to help develop sustainable travel inn the area.
Garrowby Turnoff, Bishop Wilton says...
3:47pm Sat 26 Dec 09
Arblaster, York says...
6:17pm Sat 26 Dec 09
Bishlad, Bishopthorpe says...
7:11pm Sat 26 Dec 09
KarenWhite1978, Heslington says...
3:28pm Sun 27 Dec 09
Arblaster wrote:York is good place for quick shopping journeys (if you think it's picturesque I suggest you visit some other old rather better preserved towns in England, France, Germany, Austria and Serbia).
".. and there are no congested streets to negotiate (and few if any tourists). More please." ...says your correspondent. If tourist-ridden York city-centre is annoying you because it's old, narrow and picturesque, and thus is inadequate for 'real' car-based shopping, I suggest you go and live somewhere that does not attract many visitors; Rotherham?....
scooterboy, york says...
9:03am Mon 28 Dec 09
Older Sometimes Wiser, York says...
1:17pm Mon 28 Dec 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Looking for a new career? Find a job in York and all around North Yorkshire
Search Now »
Love and friendship - find your perfect match.
Search Now »
Find properties for sale and rent in and around York.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale all over Yorkshire and the North.
Search Now »
pedalling paul , York says...
12:18pm Sat 26 Dec 09
"By shaping the pattern of development and influencing the location, scale,
density, design and mix of land uses, planning can help to reduce the need to travel,
reduce the length of journeys and make it safer and easier for people to access jobs,
shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling.
Consistent application of these planning policies will help to reduce some of the need for car journeys (by reducing the physical separation of key land uses) and enable people to
make sustainable transport choices."
So why increase car- dependant developments? Or are the developers to make a section 106 contribution to help develop sustainable travel inn the area.