News RSS Feed


Plan to extend Monks Cross Shopping Centre


DEVELOPERS are planning to build an extension to Monks Cross Shopping Centre in a multi-million-pound project that could create dozens of jobs for York.

They want to expand the centre at its western side, just off the Jockey Lane/Monks Cross Drive roundabout, to make space for Carphone Warehouse and a mystery furniture chain.

As well as the new shop of about 1,160 square metres, they also plan to install a mezzanine floor in an existing building, and add a new food and drink area, between Debenhams and Starbucks.

But the move would lead to a loss of some parking spaces and the children’s play area, which has sparked opposition.

Planning consultancy Indigo, which is representing Monks Cross management, said officials were in advanced talks with the two potential clients and said there were no other suitable sites in York. Management at the shopping park have been in talks with City of York Council over the project for 18 months.

A spokeswoman said the development would have an annual turnover of about £4.3 million and would create 70 full and part-time jobs, as well as construction work.

A statement supporting a planning application said the proposals would provide a “modern, high-quality development” that would enhance the overall area.

Huntington Parish Council has objected to the plans though, saying they would exacerbate existing traffic and parking problems at the centre, and the city council’s own city development team has also raised some concerns.

Their officer Rebecca Harrison said the limited use of the playpark may be due to its design, location and lack of maintenance, and said the developers should provide a new one as part of their plans. She also said restrictions should be imposed, to prevent the new shop being broken up into multiple units and to ensure only food and drink were sold from the smaller outlets, but did not formally object to the plans.

The Environment Agency has objected, however, saying the developers have not presented an adequate flood risk assessment, while the council’s landscape architect Esther Priestley has raised concerns over the loss of trees around the edge of the shopping park. The application is due to be decided upon by the city council next month.


Your Say YourPress

pedalling paul , York says...
12:18pm Sat 26 Dec 09

Quote from the DfT Planning Policy Guidance no 13 (PPG13) on Planning and Transport.
"By shaping the pattern of development and influencing the location, scale,
density, design and mix of land uses, planning can help to reduce the need to travel,
reduce the length of journeys and make it safer and easier for people to access jobs,
shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling.
Consistent application of these planning policies will help to reduce some of the need for car journeys (by reducing the physical separation of key land uses) and enable people to
make sustainable transport choices."
So why increase car- dependant developments? Or are the developers to make a section 106 contribution to help develop sustainable travel inn the area.

Gresmit, York says...
1:13pm Sat 26 Dec 09

pedalling paul wrote:
Quote from the DfT Planning Policy Guidance no 13 (PPG13) on Planning and Transport. "By shaping the pattern of development and influencing the location, scale, density, design and mix of land uses, planning can help to reduce the need to travel, reduce the length of journeys and make it safer and easier for people to access jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling. Consistent application of these planning policies will help to reduce some of the need for car journeys (by reducing the physical separation of key land uses) and enable people to make sustainable transport choices." So why increase car- dependant developments? Or are the developers to make a section 106 contribution to help develop sustainable travel inn the area.
I agree with Pedalling Paul. Why not encourage more development in the city centre? Monk's Cross is just an amorphous retail jumble with no character and I avoid it as far as possible.

roclank2000, York says...
2:09pm Sat 26 Dec 09

Great news. The parking is free and there are no congested streets to negotiate (and few if any tourists). More please.

dubber, york says...
2:17pm Sat 26 Dec 09

i agree with roclank2000 surely the retail parks are best out of town people can still travel by bus and as said free parking apt sec word yeah-free

The Cat Amongst The Pigeons, Ye Olde Citee of Yorke says...
3:42pm Sat 26 Dec 09

Gresmit wrote:
pedalling paul wrote:
Quote from the DfT Planning Policy Guidance no 13 (PPG13) on Planning and Transport. "By shaping the pattern of development and influencing the location, scale, density, design and mix of land uses, planning can help to reduce the need to travel, reduce the length of journeys and make it safer and easier for people to access jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services by public transport, walking, and cycling. Consistent application of these planning policies will help to reduce some of the need for car journeys (by reducing the physical separation of key land uses) and enable people to make sustainable transport choices." So why increase car- dependant developments? Or are the developers to make a section 106 contribution to help develop sustainable travel inn the area.
I agree with Pedalling Paul. Why not encourage more development in the city centre? Monk's Cross is just an amorphous retail jumble with no character and I avoid it as far as possible.
Where?

Garrowby Turnoff, Bishop Wilton says...
3:47pm Sat 26 Dec 09

I wonder if the bloke that designed the York Maze will be asked to re-design the over-elaborate Monks X car park again?

Arblaster, York says...
6:17pm Sat 26 Dec 09

".. and there are no congested streets to negotiate (and few if any tourists). More please."
...says your correspondent.

If tourist-ridden York city-centre is annoying you because it's old, narrow and picturesque, and thus is inadequate for 'real' car-based shopping, I suggest you go and live somewhere that does not attract many visitors; Rotherham?....

Bishlad, Bishopthorpe says...
7:11pm Sat 26 Dec 09

Coppergate 2 perhaps or will the campaigners who really don't want to move the City forward win again?

KarenWhite1978, Heslington says...
3:28pm Sun 27 Dec 09

Arblaster wrote:
".. and there are no congested streets to negotiate (and few if any tourists). More please." ...says your correspondent. If tourist-ridden York city-centre is annoying you because it's old, narrow and picturesque, and thus is inadequate for 'real' car-based shopping, I suggest you go and live somewhere that does not attract many visitors; Rotherham?....
York is good place for quick shopping journeys (if you think it's picturesque I suggest you visit some other old rather better preserved towns in England, France, Germany, Austria and Serbia).

Monks Cross is a destination for Xmas shopping and the sales; unless of course you enjoy subsidising the council via parking.

Having said that, yesterday, I went to Leeds due to free parking on Boxing Day. No congestion, no northern ring road, but alas no "picturesque" Xmas card York Shambles etc. No cyles either.

scooterboy, york says...
9:03am Mon 28 Dec 09

why not plant trees instead of taking over all this land

Older Sometimes Wiser, York says...
1:17pm Mon 28 Dec 09

Whoever designs any new shopping centre should pay much more attention to car park design and access.
For example the Morrison's Car park off Foss Island road needs a total upgrade both in access road design, signing and parking spacing as the existing format is unsafe.
Similarly the Castle car park is cramped & badly lit .On winter evenings can be a real hazard to users and as this is the main car park for evening visitors a lighting upgrade should be mandatory.

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »