News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


News coverage for York, Ryedale, East Yorkshire, Harrogate and Selby.

Popular topics: Community Stadium | Snow | Germany Beck | ftr | Queen's visit | Council tax


City of York Council set to axe 350 jobs


MORE than £15 million of savings are to be made at City of York Council, leading to job cuts, spending cuts and a shake-up of vital services.

The authority has unveiled plans for a massive overhaul of its budgets, in an attempt to end the year-on-year battle to trim costs.

At least £15.5 million of savings are sought over the next three years, according to an “efficiency report” published yesterday. It says there will “inevitably” be job losses, but says natural wastage will be used whenever possible.

The Press has been told as many as 350 jobs could go. There are currently 8,100 posts at the council, but that includes multiple jobs for the same people.

Council leader Andrew Waller said even more savings may become necessary after the General Election, but said the council would not compromise on the quality of services.

But John Kinsella, regional organiser of the trade union Unison, said: “We are absolutely appalled. It looks as though this efficiency report suggests huge cuts in the workforce of the council and privatisation on a large scale, which we consider will lead to a drastic reduction in services.”

The potential savings are being identified by consultancy firm Northgate Kendric Ash, who will be paid only if the savings are achieved.

They have already identified more than £17 million of potential savings, across ten areas.

Proposals include:

* Making some staff more flexible, so they do different jobs rather than one specific role

* Closing some reception points and replacing them with a single customer service unit

* More use of large corporate contracts, to cut spending on goods such as paper and food

* Less computer equipment, meaning less need for space in the planned new headquarters

* Providing more services online

* Outsourcing or privatising some services.

The report, entitled More For York and written by the council’s director of resources Ian Floyd, also suggests possible cuts in senior management and up to £3 million of cuts in adult social care, including more use of warden call or telecare services giving more “customer independence”. Mr Kinsella said: “We are amazed that the council is going down this line given the findings of the BBC Panorama programme recently. Staff employed by City of York Council to provide care services do so to the highest standard. Providing good value for money and maintaining direct provision is in the best interest of the community in York.”

In April, an undercover Panorama reporter revealed problems with the Carewatch provider in York, including missed or late calls.

In his report, Mr Floyd said the challenge facing councils in coming years “should not be understated”, with more demand on services and less public spending as a result of the global economic crisis.

He said there had to be a “robust and substantial” efficiency drive, which would be “almost impossible” with existing staffing levels.

He said it was time for a “one council” approach to savings, rather than pursuing department by department cuts.

The report will go before the council’s ruling executive on July 7.


Where the first cuts will be

IF approved, the efficiency programme will focus on ten areas in its first year: Neighbourhood services; housing; adult social care; customer services; procurement; information and communications technology; income collection; human resources; property; and senior management structures.


What the politicians say...

Andrew Waller, council leader (Liberal Democrat): “It is clear that over the next three years public expenditure is going to be cut hard. We will not know the full extent until after the General Election. This gives us a process to review the efficiency of the council. I am determined that we look for this £15 million of savings, but that we do it proving York solutions to York issues.”

David Scott, leader of the Labour opposition, said Labour had long called for structural changes to save money. But he said: “We are concerned that at a time when satisfaction with council services continues to drop efficiency should not mean a reduction in services.” He said cuts in senior management could save £1.6 million a year, which he said would be enough to re-open the Barbican Centre.

Ian Gillies, leader of the Conservatives: “This is the first step. In itself, it is not an end. It is the first step in an efficiency process. I am confident we will reach the targets, and we need to, because we cannot go on increasing public spending.”

Comments(19)

Old Spice says...
10:13am Sat 27 Jun 09

"We will not know the full extent until after the General Election."
Hardly likely they will still be in power by then is it1

H8r says...
10:45am Sat 27 Jun 09

If they want to save some money why don't they let their offices in St Leonards Place turn into a massive eyesore....oh wait....they've done that already.

roberts says...
11:42am Sat 27 Jun 09

Old Spice wrote:
"We will not know the full extent until after the General Election."
Hardly likely they will still be in power by then is it1
It is guaranteed they will be in power then. Considering the general election has to be held in 2010 and the next council election is 2011.

Come on Press board pick up your game the inaccuracies and factless nonsense is becoming far too easy to point out these days

Soothsayer17 says...
12:14pm Sat 27 Jun 09

roberts wrote:
Old Spice wrote: "We will not know the full extent until after the General Election." Hardly likely they will still be in power by then is it1
It is guaranteed they will be in power then. Considering the general election has to be held in 2010 and the next council election is 2011. Come on Press board pick up your game the inaccuracies and factless nonsense is becoming far too easy to point out these days
Are you sure you, of all people, want that, Roberts?

York1900 says...
12:30pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Well they have to recover some of the money wasted on New HQ and it looks like they are getting rid of staff

then the poor service we all ready get will go to nothing

You Know why more cuts are to come in after after the General Election

They are hoping that we get a Tory Government who have said they will scrap the minimum wags

Nice one


York1900 says...
12:32pm Sat 27 Jun 09

H8r, york says...
10:45am Sat 27 Jun 09
If they want to save some money why don't they let their offices in St Leonards Place turn into a massive eyesore....oh wait....they've done that already.

They do not own them they sold them


TooRad says...
12:32pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Making some staff more flexible, so they do different jobs rather than one specific role

Or, in plain English and not dressed up in council spin -

Making people do more work for the same money. Making people do the two peoples jobs for the pay of one.

That point rankles with me. Ask any council employee from the target areas mentioned and they will tell you they are already overworked and their service overstretched.

roberts says...
1:01pm Sat 27 Jun 09

TooRad wrote:
Making some staff more flexible, so they do different jobs rather than one specific role

Or, in plain English and not dressed up in council spin -

Making people do more work for the same money. Making people do the two peoples jobs for the pay of one.

That point rankles with me. Ask any council employee from the target areas mentioned and they will tell you they are already overworked and their service overstretched.
Correct. That's because York's council tax is so low. The council is chronically underfunded already and now the government will slowly start to reduce local government funding to dig itself out of the hole it got itself in.

And Sooth, before you start spouting the usual nonsense have a look here

http://vfm.audit-com
mission.gov.uk/HomeP
age.aspx

Here are some highlights

Authority's council tax requirement per band D property.

3rd lowest of all unitary authorities

Total expenditure on services 's /head

lowest of all unitary authorities

pedalling paul says...
2:02pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Does that mean the CoYC is being indirectly penalised for being too efficient...?

Soothsayer17 says...
3:44pm Sat 27 Jun 09

roberts wrote:
TooRad wrote:
Making some staff more flexible, so they do different jobs rather than one specific role
Or, in plain English and not dressed up in council spin - Making people do more work for the same money. Making people do the two peoples jobs for the pay of one. That point rankles with me. Ask any council employee from the target areas mentioned and they will tell you they are already overworked and their service overstretched.
Correct. That's because York's council tax is so low. The council is chronically underfunded already and now the government will slowly start to reduce local government funding to dig itself out of the hole it got itself in. And Sooth, before you start spouting the usual nonsense have a look here http://vfm.audit-com mission.gov.uk/HomeP age.aspx Here are some highlights Authority's council tax requirement per band D property. 3rd lowest of all unitary authorities Total expenditure on services 's /head lowest of all unitary authorities
Only you could use the opportunity of hundreds of people losing their jobs to propgandise the council.

Truly you can no longer see the woods for the trees.

Maquis says...
4:59pm Sat 27 Jun 09

What we need are councillors who have business sense. They have books to balance, staff to employ, and services to supply. We would be far better to have entrepreneurs who can ensure efficiency whilst giving people what they want.

Council Care Worker says...
5:30pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Can I also point out that this is not just about Council staff losing their jobs - it is also very likely that many of our senior citizens in Council Residential Care settings will lose their homes! OK - they will be moved somewhere else but do they want to be?

the butler says...
6:21pm Sat 27 Jun 09

So, the city was overburdened with too great a labour force, It has taken a very long time to arrive at this point! the management has not been on top of things, it seems ; reduce the bonuses now!

ouseswimmer says...
6:40pm Sat 27 Jun 09

SO that's it then rubbish collections once a month and no one left to complain to.

Radiohead says...
7:10pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Okay, if you have to make savings.

1. There's no need to employ a Chief Exec at £145,000. The Chief Exec does not have to bring in any business.

2. The council is saturated with middle-management in made-up jobs. These positions need to be rationalised, not the face workers.

3. Time for a change nationally and locally. Less MPs = less swindlers and less councillors who are not elected but are actually interviewed into salaried full-time positions. York council isn't the only council who happily wastes wads of taxpayers money on irreverent and unfeasible projects.

4. City of York Council should lead from the front in times of crisis. There are various sites dotted around York with good parking and infrastructure already in place if it wants a new HQ. This will be a far cheaper proposal.

5. The public are fleeced for all manner of tax in this country. We wouldn't mind if it was spent wisely at NATIONAL and LOCAL level. The people in Westminster do not realise the contempt with which they are held at the moment and this rubs off onto local politicians too. Never forget you are servants of the people and you certainly are not above them in some sort of two-tier feather-my-own-nest system. There should have been a general election because if any of us did flipped our mortgages, we'd be in jail.

Think on.

pandaface says...
11:09pm Sat 27 Jun 09

oh no...looks like the adult and housing sector will be prim e target..looking into my crystal ball and what do i see,,,,,the vast majority of grass roots care workers will be replaced with low paid agency workers with no attached employment roghts as such....no sick pay.no pension schemes,,no standards of work ethics,point of recall or adeqaute training.remember..c
arewatch/panorama...
.
the victims of such a travesty would not be just the care workers both in house and in the home/community,but the most vulnerable members of society many of whom rely on the daily visits of carers who are dedicated,passionate
,professional and reliable..
lets keep the care of the elderly/disabled firmly control.

Finney144 says...
11:12am Sun 28 Jun 09

Why can't we get a mayor like the new mayor of Doncaster? Sounds like he's the man for our job as well as theirs. He's using common sense which is very rare everywhere but impossible to find in the City of York Council.

Dynamic says...
12:50pm Sun 28 Jun 09

If they have to have savings, thin out the management structure not those who actually do the work ! and those daft politically correct jobs that the mayor of doncaster is dumping. Get back to providing a service to the public not a jobs club for the loony lefties.

mystic_genius says...
8:08am Mon 29 Jun 09

Radiohead wrote:
Okay, if you have to make savings. 1. There's no need to employ a Chief Exec at £145,000. The Chief Exec does not have to bring in any business. 2. The council is saturated with middle-management in made-up jobs. These positions need to be rationalised, not the face workers. 3. Time for a change nationally and locally. Less MPs = less swindlers and less councillors who are not elected but are actually interviewed into salaried full-time positions. York council isn't the only council who happily wastes wads of taxpayers money on irreverent and unfeasible projects. 4. City of York Council should lead from the front in times of crisis. There are various sites dotted around York with good parking and infrastructure already in place if it wants a new HQ. This will be a far cheaper proposal. 5. The public are fleeced for all manner of tax in this country. We wouldn't mind if it was spent wisely at NATIONAL and LOCAL level. The people in Westminster do not realise the contempt with which they are held at the moment and this rubs off onto local politicians too. Never forget you are servants of the people and you certainly are not above them in some sort of two-tier feather-my-own-nest system. There should have been a general election because if any of us did flipped our mortgages, we'd be in jail. Think on.

The man (or woman) talks complete sense.

Alas, you are, I imagine, not in a position of significant authority to change anything in this regard. And those who are are too busy counting their tax-payer fleeced monies to care.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses