News RSS Feed Send your news


News coverage for York, North Yorkshire, East Yorkshire and Harrogate.


Support growing for mast protest


CONCERNED parents are backing a petition against a mobile phone mast being planned for a town near York.

At the beginning of this month, residents and business owners around Oak Tree Lane, in Haxby, received a letter sent on behalf of phone giants Vodafone, informing them the mobile operator wanted to install a ten-metre tall mast in the street.

Joanne Smith, 39, and her brother, Richard Boddy, 27, who run the Londis shop in Oak Tree Lane, were so concerned about having the mast less than ten metres from their front door that they started a petition against it.

Joanne said she had health concerns about the mast, which would be less than 200 metres from Headlands Primary School.

She said children from the school often congregated in the pavement area outside the shop where Vodafone want to put its mast.

Joanne said her brother Richard lived above the shop and would have the telecommunications device right outside his bedroom window.

Husband Tony Smith, 40, said hundreds of locals – many with children at Headlands – had been into the shop and signed the petition. He said Richard had collected more signatures going door-to-door in the village.

“A lot of people are on the same wavelength as us,” he said. “It’s not the fact there’s a mast, it’s the position of it. A lot of people are concerned about the health implications.”

He said the mast and two control boxes proposed for the site would cause an obstruction on the busy pavement, with the shop and bus stops both nearby.

Tony said the petition had now been sent to Tyco Electronics, the company which sent out the original consultation letters on behalf of Vodafone.

In that letter, Jodie Kane said the mast was needed because of an “urgent need to address the present coverage deficits being experienced within this cell area”.

She said: “While we appreciate the proposed development site is located within a dense residential area, due to the very specific and localised coverage deficit that Vodafone are experiencing, this cannot be avoided.”

A spokesman for the telecoms giant said the proposed radio base station was required to improve 3G coverage to its customers in the area.

He said: “This location was chosen as it provides a backdrop of street furniture, against which the proposed street pole will not be visually intrusive. We recognise that some communities are concerned regarding the deployment of radio base stations. All of our base stations are designed, built and operated in accordance with stringent international guidelines.”


Your Say YourPress

moleculeman, Acomb says...
8:03am Wed 24 Sep 08

How many times. WHAT HEALTH IMPLICATIONS? There is no evidence that mobile phone masts cause any illness whatsoever. And when will people realise that if they want mobile phone coverage, they have to have masts nearby?
If these people had come to my door with this nonsense petition I'd have given them short shrift.

BL2, York says...
9:17am Wed 24 Sep 08

moleculeman wrote:
How many times. WHAT HEALTH IMPLICATIONS? There is no evidence that mobile phone masts cause any illness whatsoever. And when will people realise that if they want mobile phone coverage, they have to have masts nearby?
If these people had come to my door with this nonsense petition I'd have given them short shrift.Ermm, actually there is (sort of) - mobile phone use causes problems. This is not necessarily linked to masts, but since the masts are more powerful then better safe than sorry!

Mobile phone use 'raises children's risk of brain cancer fivefold'

http://www.independe
nt.co.uk/news/scienc
e/mobile-phone-use-r
aises-childrens-risk
-of-brain-cancer-fiv
efold-937005.html
{/quote]

BL2, York says...
9:18am Wed 24 Sep 08

Don't know what happened to the above post, but my comments start half way down... Stupid quote option...

jaycee, York says...
9:20am Wed 24 Sep 08

If these parents are really concerned about health implications then I suggest that everyone who signs the petition hands in their mobile phone to the shop and the shop owners crush them with a hammer in front of the person.Have the shop owners got rid of theirs ?

jaycee, York says...
9:29am Wed 24 Sep 08

Thanks for the info BL2 about mobile phone use increasing childrens risk of brain cancer.It just reinforces my previous comment.If parents are that concerned then they will hand in their own mobile phones and take away their childrens phones .Will it happen ? Don't think so.

York1900, York says...
1:16pm Wed 24 Sep 08

You can get arguments for and against anything

It was not until the late 70's early 80's that it was proved that smoking was bad for you

As some one who as worked with radio transmitters for over 30 years

I would not expose children to them for hours on end as it is slow cooking them with Radio Frequency

if you look at what a microwave oven do's in minutes at 600 watts to food

The thing is that the damage will not be apparent for years by which time it is too late


moleculeman, Acomb says...
4:15pm Wed 24 Sep 08

BL2, I'm afraid you've been taken in by a bit of scaremongering by the Indy there. I've spent a while hunting about for the study they cite in the article you link to, and the conclusions it draws are nothing like what was written in the article.
Results/conclusion (according to author)
The results showed overall no significantly increased risk for regular mobile phone use and brain tumours. Ipsilateral (on the same side) use for more than 10 years showed a significantly increased risk for glioma (OR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4) and acoustic neuroma (OR 2.4, CI 1.2-5.3).
The authors concluded that the meta-analysis gave a consistent pattern of association between mobile phone use for more than 10 years and ipsilateral glioma and acoustic neuroma.

That is to say, heavy mobile phone use (defined in the study as more than 10 years use (I saw >2000 hours quoted somewhere, but I couldn't find it again, so I couldn't say if that was over the whole 10 years, or yearly, whichever, it's still quite a long time)) does increase cancer risk, but normal phone use does not. The other point to make is that this is caused by holding the transmitter right against the side of your head for long periods. I suggest that no-one would be silly enough to spend years with their head resting against a phone mast. I should also point out that in urban areas, masts also do not run at high power, specifically to limit the size of the cell they cover, thus ensuring enough bandwidth is available for all users.

I give you links:
http://www.emf-porta
l.org/viewer.php?sid
=&sform=6&aid=15901&
l=e
http://www.badscienc
e.net/category/elect
rosensitivity/

Fred Bloggs, York says...
11:30pm Wed 24 Sep 08

Well if all the kids of today are getting their brains fried by RF and microwaves, it is just as well that the Government has conspired to dumb down educational standards to compensate.

Have to agree with what was muted above, people are more than happy to use mobiles when it suits them, especially if their car breaks down or whatever whilst at the same time complain about the masts that are required to make them work. You can't have you cake and eat it!

Your sayYour Press

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE York Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

Tony Smith with staff and fellow  protesters angry at the proposed siting of a Vodafone mast outside their shops in Oaktree Lane Haxby Tony Smith with staff and fellow protesters angry at the proposed siting of a Vodafone mast outside their shops in Oaktree Lane Haxby

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »