News RSS Feed


Deal will unlock city centre teardrop site

11:00am Thursday 24th July 2008

comment Comments (18)   Have your say »

By Mike Laycock »

THE York Central scheme has been in the pipeline for many years – but if all goes to plan, matters should now move forward much more quickly.

A spokeswoman said a preferred developer was likely to be identified by next spring and it was anticipated that a planning application could be submitted in 2010.

However, she stressed such a scheme, bringing significant private investment in regional infrastructure, tourism and business, was likely to be delivered in several phases, and it was difficult at this stage to give specific timescales.

She said once a legal agreement had been reached, Network Rail, Yorkshire Forward, the National Museum of Science & Industry and the selected developer would consult with local residents, businesses, passengers and other stakeholders on the plans as part of the planning process.

“We will seek planning permission only once a development partner has been selected and drawn up their proposals in more detail. Once this has been done we will give local stakeholders and members of the public the opportunity to review our plans and feed into their development as we seek any necessary planning permissions.”

Asked whether the scheme, which has been under discussion for many years, would now go ahead, she said studies had shown that a top-quality development could be delivered to the benefit of all parties. “Previous discussions about the site have never progressed to this stage – we are now in a position to seek a high-quality development partner. At present no specific developers have been identified and we are open to all expressions of interest.”

Asked how a developer would be chosen, she said initial expressions of interest would be considered and then a “long-list” formed.

“Developers on this long-list will be invited to give further details of how they would approach such a development, then a final shortlist will be chosen.”

She said shortlisted developers would be provided with more detailed development guidance to allow them to draw up more detailed proposals, which would then be considered by Network Rail, Yorkshire Forward and the museum. “A preferred developer will be selected from this short-list in spring 2009.”

She did not expect the developments to disrupt services or lead to any closure of York Station.

She said the regeneration of vacant and underutilised railway land would create an income stream for future investment in the railways, which would not impact on passengers or taxpayers. “The development will mean significant private investment in York, bringing more high- quality retail to the city centre, helping to retain and encourage more shoppers to visit, providing a new transport interchange at the region’s major station, and bringing improvements to the National Railway Museum, one of the region’s major tourist attractions. “Moreover it will provide much needed residential development on a brownfield, city centre site, reducing pressure for greenfield development.”


Scheme could be an ‘international showcase’

YORK MP Hugh Bayley called today for the York Central development to be an international showcase for “sustainable, low-carbon living.”

He said York was a unique city and there was a duty to protect it for future generations.

“The York central development will bring us new jobs and much-needed family housing, but it must be in keeping with the city’s scale and heritage, and built with modern technology to be an international showcase for sustainable low-carbon living,” he said.

“There is no other historic city in Europe with a similar opportunity for a large city centre development. If we get it right we will enhance York’s reputation and prosperity. If we foul up or cut corners, we will be blamed for centuries to come.”

York council leader Andrew Waller said today’s announcement was a result of a great deal of hard work put in by his predecessor Steve Galloway in bringing parties together to talk.

He said: “Five years ago, it didn’t look as if progress. There has been a tremendous effort to bring this forward.”

Coun Waller added there was a “huge potential” on the site for a modern public transport interchange which would benefit both residents and tourists.

He said the prospect of a billion pound investment in the city should be encouraging for future employment, creating thousands of jobs.


Your Say YourPress

scrappydo, York says...
11:48am Thu 24 Jul 08

This new development should provide York with a decent cohesive TRAM, TRAIN and shuttle bus central Public transport network, including potentially newly laid dedicated tram lines from the Tesco tadcaster road park and ride site, as there is enough land space to lay a dedicated track between York and Tesco.

This new development could potentially remove First's bus service strangle hold on York and their congestion causing polluting bendy buses from our roads, not to mention removing certain unfair competion actions assisted by biased strategic transport councillors.

TW, Wrong Planet says...
12:28pm Thu 24 Jul 08

".....If we get it right we will enhance York’s reputation and prosperity. If we foul up or cut corners, we will be blamed for centuries to come.”

Maybe they should build the new Council Carbuncle there then.

scrappydo, York says...
12:59pm Thu 24 Jul 08

Joined up future York Development Transport strategy.

York Sugar Factory developers should now be made to leave the rails in place at the old sidings and build a new station on those old sidings for a new tram service to the New York Central development, thus removing more buses and car journeys from the sugar factory development area.

They should also build a new sidings and platform at the future Park and Ride Site at Poppleton again removing the use of buses and further CO2 and congestion on the A59.

Both of these potential tram usages remove additional CO2 and future congesting buses proposed by certain councillors.

Now lets see how ECO-Friendly GREEN OUR councillors actually are.

realist, York says...
1:18pm Thu 24 Jul 08

Whats the betting that the benefits for residents will be downscaled gradually over time followed by plans to build more luxury flats for leeds commuters, seen it all before ;-)

scrappydo, York says...
1:29pm Thu 24 Jul 08

York City Council in joint co-operation with Network Rail now have the potential for showing how to build future ECO_FRIENDLY TOWNS without the need to turn green field sites into so called ECO TOWNS which currently have no major transport infrastructure systems and only narrow country lanes, such as the Labour government are currently planning and enforcing on local communities.

This could make York the most prestigious ECO-Friendly environmental development and public transport CO2 free city in the UK to aspire to.

petethefeet, York says...
2:46pm Thu 24 Jul 08

The development of the tear-drop AND the British Sugar site is vitally important to Acomb and York NW. We have been virtually cut-off from the rest of York, care of the river and the railway.

As a starter, Leeman Road as we know it should dissappear. This would reprieve Salisbury Terrace from it's curse of years. To make up for the loss, we need to link up the new commercial estate at the bottom of Poppy road with the Marble arch. This would need one a new bridge over the railway if the station "shunt" line is to be preserved (getting rid would be better if it didn't compromise railways development).
We need to have an alternative route through for cycles and, possibly buses as well. Perhaps, Salisbury terrace and the low bridge could be retained, with a rising bollard, for this purpose.

We need a walking/cylcling route all the way through from Milfield Lane that goes nowhere near Boroughbridge road. I understand that there used to be a riverside path alongside the water works. I wonder if there is a possibility of claiming a right-of-way there.

I look forward to see what comes of this carbuncle with eager anticipation.

Anybody else got ideas?

Pedro, York says...
4:57pm Thu 24 Jul 08

The problem with York is that we have to compromise. Bridges and overpasses are ugly - but without them we will never have cycle/pedestrian friendly city. And without a cycle friendly city people won't get out of cars and on to bikes. Naturally you can go one further and ban traffic totally - but how you could do that a major junction like Exhibition Square? The council can produce all the fantasy photography it wants - but the place will always be free-for-all madness with cyclists trying to pick there way through alive. There probably circus acts less dangerous than trying to get to York Hospital from the city centre.

the butler, cowichan Bay says...
5:35pm Thu 24 Jul 08

Local transportation seems to be one prominent item that needs to be addressed.No mention has been made of using electricaly powered buses.
would this form of transport answer the question of polution reduction?..

York43, Clifton Moor says...
5:37pm Thu 24 Jul 08

My comment wasn't posted, are you affiliated with the developer???

York43, Clifton Moor says...
5:37pm Thu 24 Jul 08

My comment wasn't posted, are you affiliated with the developer???

York43, Clifton Moor says...
5:37pm Thu 24 Jul 08

My comment wasn't posted, are you affiliated with the developer???

York43, Clifton Moor says...
5:37pm Thu 24 Jul 08

My comment wasn't posted, are you affiliated with the developer???

York43, Clifton Moor says...
5:37pm Thu 24 Jul 08

My comment wasn't posted, are you affiliated with the developer???

York43, Clifton Moor says...
5:52pm Thu 24 Jul 08

This could mean a great foot forward for York...or, do not listen to the old fools who's mortgage is safe (I don't have a gote beard!) I'm a guy who am struggling to pay my mortgage, like the rest of you, I am struggling to pay it...We can't please everybody all of the time. but hey, lets look after the majority!

pedalling paul , York says...
9:40pm Thu 24 Jul 08

The previous development brief for the "teardrop" site had a lot of input by pedal cycle lobby groups. We particularly requested that Cinder Lane bridge be lowered, to be flush with the adjacent road on the Holgate side and ramped down to Cinder Lane on the City side. This would create a really useful cycling and walking link between Poppleton Road area and Leeman Road tunnel/city centre.
Hopefully a new Development Brief will incorporate the best of the old post-public consultation one.

Head of Bomber Command, York. says...
10:10am Fri 25 Jul 08

York central Scheme.
Where there is a scheme there is a SCHEMER...Someone will benefit from it all,but it waint be any of us pond life.

ThisIsOli, York CC says...
11:12am Fri 25 Jul 08

I like the way they haven't mentioned half the proposals put forward by York citizens, although I like the bus depot idea I htink an arrea so close to the train station would be a fantastic location for a large sports/music venue, building a stadium here could bring a lot to the city allowing some bigger musical acts to visit the city and as use as a sporting stadium.

This central location would also be a great location for a sports centre, currently nearly all sporting facilities are at the other end of the city and usually a fair trek!

Fat-cat, Tadcaster says...
11:44pm Fri 25 Jul 08

What about the casino/lap dancing club?
those stags nights/hen parties are loaded

mark me words

Your sayYourPress

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE York Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
York Central “teardrop” site York Central “teardrop” site

Sponsored Links


Your Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »