Treasure hunter finds Roman ring

Treasure hunter finds Roman ring

The silver roman ring

The silver roman ring

First published in News by

A ROMAN ring that was discovered in a field near York has been classified as an item of treasure, an inquest heard.

The silver ring which could date as far back as first century AD, was discovered by Peter Spencer, while he was searching a field in Dunnington using a metal detector.

The jewel, whose value will be determined by the treasure valuation committee, was despatched to the British Museum, where it was examined, and a report on it completed.

The report, by Ralph Jackson, at the museum’s department of pre-history and Europe, described the find as a small, Roman silver finger ring, incised with a stylised palm-branch motif, flanked at the base by a pair of crosses.

It said the jewel was “a complete, undamaged example of a slender Roman ring type made variously in gold, silver or copper alloy. The palm-branch motif was a ubiquitous symbol of victory believed to offer protection against malignant forces and to help a deceased wearer reach the afterlife.” The British Museum said there has been “reasonable interest” in acquiring the item, the inquest was told.

A spokesman for the York Museums Trust yesterday said it was unable to confirm whether the the Yorkshire Museum was interested in purchasing the treasure. Giving his verdict, York coroner Donald Coverdale said: “This item is made of silver, its origin is first to third century AD – so on these two criteria it can be classified, and I do classify it, as treasure.”

Mr Coverdale said he hoped the ring would go to the Yorkshire Museum. The report said the ring dated from between the first and third centuries AD, and that it weighed 4.3 grams.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:32pm Thu 24 Jul 08

petethefeet says...

mmm. Wonder what it is worth? If it is valuable, there might be a dispute between the land-owner and the finder.
mmm. Wonder what it is worth? If it is valuable, there might be a dispute between the land-owner and the finder. petethefeet
  • Score: 0

2:43pm Thu 24 Jul 08

Bemused says...

mmm. Wonder what it is worth? If it is valuable, there might be a dispute between the land-owner and the finder.

Doesn't tend to be an issue, and I think the coroner decides based on centuries of legal precedence.
[quote]mmm. Wonder what it is worth? If it is valuable, there might be a dispute between the land-owner and the finder.[/quote] Doesn't tend to be an issue, and I think the coroner decides based on centuries of legal precedence. Bemused
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree