Pocklington housing project set for approval

York Press: Pocklington housing project set for approval Pocklington housing project set for approval

A CONTROVERSIAL housing estate looks set to get the go-ahead provided builders come to an arrangement with council officers over play areas and a speed limit.

More than 100 organisations filed objections to the scheme by David Wilson Homes on land off Burnby Lane, Pocklington, when the developers applied for planning permission last year.

The builders want to build 77 houses, including some affordable houses.

Pocklington Town Council was among the objectors, and urged East Riding of Yorkshire Council to reject the application on the grounds that it would create extra traffic, that the residential units would be too tightly packed in the area and the town already had permission for enough houses to be built to meet local housing targets.

But planning officers at the unitary authority recommended approval to their planning committee, provided the builders entered a legally binding agreement with the authority to include play and leisure areas for children and adults and contribute financially to the costs of lowering the speed limit on Burnby Lane to 30 mph from 60mph.

The officers said the proposed development was on land allocated for housing.

Councillors gave the director of planning approval to grant permission.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:36am Mon 3 Feb 14

X5019c says...

Yet another example of the failure of modern democracy.
Whose agenda are they following?
Yet another example of the failure of modern democracy. Whose agenda are they following? X5019c
  • Score: 6

8:58am Mon 3 Feb 14

JHardacre says...

"The builders want to build 77 houses, including some affordable houses."

As for the rest why would they want to build unaffordable ones?

Can't we put a stop to this ludicrous use of language? If they mean "cheap", or "sub £xx,000" or "tiny" why can't they say so?
"The builders want to build 77 houses, including some affordable houses." As for the rest why would they want to build unaffordable ones? Can't we put a stop to this ludicrous use of language? If they mean "cheap", or "sub £xx,000" or "tiny" why can't they say so? JHardacre
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree