York school slips in Ofsted rating (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Clifton Green Primary slips in Ofsted rating
8:25am Monday 18th March 2013 in News
By Haydn Lewis, haydn.lewis@thepress.co.uk
A PRIMARY school in York, previously given top marks by Ofsted inspectors, has come under fire after a new inspection revealed it now needs improvement in all areas.
With about 430 pupils, Clifton Green Primary has dropped down the Ofsted ratings and is now a school that requires improvement.
After a visit last month, inspectors found that pupil achievement needs improvement with not enough children in Years 1 to 4 making the progress the school expects in English and maths.
They also said head teacher Dave Brown “does not check thoroughly enough that all teaching is good,” that teachers are not held to account for the progress pupils make, with systems to manage teachers’ performance “weak”. However, inspectors praised the vision for the school’s future.
Mr Brown said: “I am disappointed with the outcome of the inspection as there are many good things about the school, but respect the judgements made by Ofsted. I am pleased that the inspectors recognised that we have a clear vision and direction for Clifton Green.
“We will work tirelessly to provide an environment where children not only have high achievement, but also experience opportunities that enrich their lives.
“Many of the changes and improvements we have made at the school are still in their early stages and the impact of them is not fully evident at this point in time. The Ofsted report has given us some very clear areas to work on.
“We are fully focused on addressing these issues as quickly and effectively as possible. An action plan is already in place and I will be working with teachers, governors and parents to ensure we deliver our objectives.”
Under Ofsted guidelines the rating the school has been given is “requires improvement” – which replaced the previous middle band of “satisfactory” – means it is not yet a good school, but is not inadequate.
The previous head teacher Sheila Audsley, who retired in 2010, was made a CBE for services to local and national education. In 2009 the school was awarded an “outstanding” judgement by Ofsted and in 2010 received another “outstanding” from Ofsted for an English subject inspection.
Since then, pupil numbers have increased, making the school much larger than the average-sized primary. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium funding is well above the national average nationally. The pupil premium is additional funding given to schools so they can support their disadvantaged pupils.
Jill Hodges, City of York Council’s assistant director of education, said: “The council is working hard with the school and governors to secure an Ofsted judgement of “good” as quickly as possible.”
Strengths and weaknesses
Room for improvement
• Improve the quality of teaching so it is consistently good or better for all groups of pupils by ensuring lessons are planned to take account of pupils’ needs and teachers regularly check pupils’ learning during lessons.
• Make leadership and management more effective in raising achievement and attendance further by carrying out regular and rigorous checks on the quality of teaching and ensure written records of feedback to staff are shared with those observed to support their improvement
Plus points
• Teachers consistently provide weekly reports to parents about their children’s learning.
• Curriculum changes are proving popular with staff, governors and pupils.
• Good relationships between staff, pupils and parents support pupils’ learning.
• Good systems for the care and support of pupils are well established.
Comments(18)
roskoboskovic
says...
8:41am Mon 18 Mar 13
Pete the Brickie
says...
9:08am Mon 18 Mar 13
roskoboskovic says...
8:41am Mon 18 Mar 13
these things only apply if you trust their testing criteria.personally i don t and believe that they are manipulated to suit.i d be very very angry if i was mr brown and it must be tempting to give the inspectors a piece of your mind.”
Sorry, but did you write and puntuate this with some sort of irony or humour in mind? Because all I can think about is whether you were at one of Mr Brown's schools and he never got round to checking up on your English teacher in line with the report's criticism of him. :)
metsaagain
says...
11:00am Mon 18 Mar 13
bloodaxe
says...
11:49am Mon 18 Mar 13
Pete the Brickie wrote:Syntax !
roskoboskovic says... 8:41am Mon 18 Mar 13 these things only apply if you trust their testing criteria.personally i don t and believe that they are manipulated to suit.i d be very very angry if i was mr brown and it must be tempting to give the inspectors a piece of your mind.”Sorry, but did you write and puntuate this with some sort of irony or humour in mind? Because all I can think about is whether you were at one of Mr Brown's schools and he never got round to checking up on your English teacher in line with the report's criticism of him. :)
nearlyman
says...
12:22pm Mon 18 Mar 13
nearlyman
says...
12:31pm Mon 18 Mar 13
yorkiemum wrote:So you would be quite happy to just let teachers who are not performing to the best of their ability just sit back and think all is rosy in the garden?
Here we go again what's the betting it will be forced to go to Academy status as other seemingly 'failing' schools rather convienient for Gove's plans methinks!!!
Why should pupils and parents have to settle for second best ?
There are plus points noted by the inspectors so one would expect the school to maintain those standards and improve in the areas where weaknesses have been identified.
Hiding behind peoples dislike of Governments to excuse poor standards simply will not wash. Get on with the job. There are schools out there which do come up to scratch so it is possible and that should be every schools aspiration.
bob the builder
says...
12:35pm Mon 18 Mar 13
bloodaxe
says...
1:42pm Mon 18 Mar 13
bob the builder wrote:Good to read the sum total of your knowledge about education and the running of schools. Perhaps it's time that builders' standards of craftsmanship were subject to rigorous yearly examination to determine whether or not they are competent to practise the following year. It's not in the interest of builders to admit to failing standards and builders in their firms (sic) so an independent annual check would be ideal.
... perhaps it's time Ofsted set teachers annual exams during their summer 'holiday' to determine whether they are competent to teach the following school year. It's not in the interest of head teachers to admit to failing standards and teachers in their schools so an independant annual check would be ideal.
Pete the Brickie
says...
3:43pm Mon 18 Mar 13
bloodaxe wrote:Quite, we could do with some more checks on us on top of Trading Standards, The HSE, The Building Employers Confederation, The CSCS, our insurance company, our bank, CHAS audits, supplier's guarantee audits, customer's safety audits and the Inland Revenue. That would be ideal.
bob the builder wrote:Good to read the sum total of your knowledge about education and the running of schools. Perhaps it's time that builders' standards of craftsmanship were subject to rigorous yearly examination to determine whether or not they are competent to practise the following year. It's not in the interest of builders to admit to failing standards and builders in their firms (sic) so an independent annual check would be ideal.
... perhaps it's time Ofsted set teachers annual exams during their summer 'holiday' to determine whether they are competent to teach the following school year. It's not in the interest of head teachers to admit to failing standards and teachers in their schools so an independant annual check would be ideal.
nearlyman
says...
3:50pm Mon 18 Mar 13
bloodaxe wrote:a builder is constantly monitored. If he does shoddy work his reputation dwindles and he will not get work.
bob the builder wrote:Good to read the sum total of your knowledge about education and the running of schools. Perhaps it's time that builders' standards of craftsmanship were subject to rigorous yearly examination to determine whether or not they are competent to practise the following year. It's not in the interest of builders to admit to failing standards and builders in their firms (sic) so an independent annual check would be ideal.
... perhaps it's time Ofsted set teachers annual exams during their summer 'holiday' to determine whether they are competent to teach the following school year. It's not in the interest of head teachers to admit to failing standards and teachers in their schools so an independant annual check would be ideal.
Edwin Duckbooster
says...
8:40pm Mon 18 Mar 13
sunnymummy
says...
8:47pm Mon 18 Mar 13
Only smarties have the answer
says...
9:57pm Mon 18 Mar 13
Edwin Duckbooster wrote:I think anyone would be sad when a child has had a really bad time at a school, all bullying is totally wrong. It sounds like the fresh start has worked well, which is certainly the best possible outcome for your daughter and you, although its a shame that a move became necessary.
I'm glad Ofsted has seen this school for what it is. I pulled my daughter out of Clifton Green Primary School as she was unhappy and being bullied. After having a meeting with the head to discuss this my general impression was that he was aware of bullying throughout the school but was unable to control it as it is such a big problem. He made no attempt to convince me my daughter was at the right school. She has since moved to Lakeside, has made lots of new friends, is much happier and is doing much better with her work.
I've also recently been a parent at the school and I'm amazed at what you say about the bullying being a big issue though. I can't think of many schools where I've heard so few people mentioning it as a problem. Of course bullying exists in every school occassionally and you can certainly pay huge fees at private schools and see the very worst of it. But in my time going in and out of Clifton Green I've not had any big concerns or heard other parents talking like that. That is not to say your experience wasn't bad Edwin but I did want to give my view too.
I do think Ofsted did see the school for what it is - lots of good but with clearly some issues to get on track. I hope they manage to get a good next time round, I think its what they deserve.
CaroleBaines
says...
9:44am Tue 19 Mar 13
Like the FSA did the government's bidding with not controlling lending in the 1990s and 2000s (thus fueling the false booms), Ofsted are an arm of government policy now and it stinks.
CaroleBaines
says...
9:47am Tue 19 Mar 13
As for teachers - there were some shocking ones in the past and sacking one was nigh impossible. Things have improved and could improve further. But just because that is so, don't think Ofsted are all about improving standards because they are not.
yorkiemum
says...
11:29am Tue 19 Mar 13
CaroleBaines wrote:So very very true!! Its about time people woke up to the fact that this is all political and for those who commented about bad teaching etc. I bet they haven't been in a school for years, its amazing how many people become experts on education when really they know 'nowt' How demoralising do you think it is for the staff in these school not only to be told you're crap but all you do is crap.
Over 50% of secondary schools are now academies. Do people not realise what is happening.
As for teachers - there were some shocking ones in the past and sacking one was nigh impossible. Things have improved and could improve further. But just because that is so, don't think Ofsted are all about improving standards because they are not.
birdgirl
says...
1:32pm Tue 19 Mar 13
yorkiemum wrote:I am a teacher and do know that Ofsted is not the be all and end all, however, schools are much less able to 'pull the wool' over Ofsted's eyes these days, with little time to prepare. If you read Clifton Green's Ofsted report you will see that there are basic things, such as performance management of staff, lacking and so yes, leaders of schools, who get paid good salaries, should be held accountable. I know schools who have been satisfactory in the past that have been graded as good under the new Ofsted system. It does work the other way round and is not all political at all. Nobody enjoys Ofsted inspections but they often highlight things that should be happening and need addressing. A school doesn't just slip from 'Outstanding' to 'Requires Improvement' for no reason.
CaroleBaines wrote:So very very true!! Its about time people woke up to the fact that this is all political and for those who commented about bad teaching etc. I bet they haven't been in a school for years, its amazing how many people become experts on education when really they know 'nowt' How demoralising do you think it is for the staff in these school not only to be told you're crap but all you do is crap.
Over 50% of secondary schools are now academies. Do people not realise what is happening.
As for teachers - there were some shocking ones in the past and sacking one was nigh impossible. Things have improved and could improve further. But just because that is so, don't think Ofsted are all about improving standards because they are not.
yorkiemum says...
8:32am Mon 18 Mar 13