Budget fury of York's Green party councillors

Coun Andy D’Agorne Coun Andy D’Agorne

GREEN councillors who stormed out of York’s council budget meeting have accused city leaders of stifling debate.

Local party leader Coun Andy D’Agorne and his fellow Green councillor Dave Taylor angrily left the Guildhall chamber before Thursday night’s meeting closed after proposals to extend debating time were voted down, meaning their budget plans were not presented nor discussed.

They claimed members of the ruling Labour group used up time through “rambling and irrelevant” speeches and questioned why new electronic voting buttons in the council chamber were not used to speed up proceedings.

Council regulations state budget meetings must finish at 10pm unless councillors agree an extension.

The “guillotine” rule meant Labour’s budget was also not debated due to the time spent discussing proposed Conservative and Liberal Democrat amendments. Coun D’Agorne said his group’s proposals were the only opportunity to debate “ever-increasing” outsourcing of council services, and said their suggestions – including creating a council-run renewable energy company and more money for bus services – were not given a hearing.

He said: “I was appalled that, having sat all evening through debate on Tory and Lib Dem amendments, most Labour councillors were not prepared to have the decency to allow a further ten minutes to hear our amendment.

“It was the only amendment to criticise Labour over privatisation of elderly people’s homes and propose a major initiative to create green jobs and improve public transport.”

Coun D’Agorne said he believed more time would have been granted if voting buttons had been operating, claiming a recount on the extension vote allowed Labour time to manipulate its members to oppose it. The council’s deputy leader, Coun Tracey Simpson-Laing, said Labour were also disappointed not to have chance “to speak positively about our own budget due to running out of time”, and said Coun D’Agorne’s criticism was “wide of the mark” as the Lord Mayor ruled on when such meetings would end.

“Some councillors are carers and cannot sit endlessly in meetings, and thankfully 1am finishes are now a thing of the past,” she said.

“Group leaders are reviewing how meetings can operate more effectively in future. Coun D’Agorne will have the opportunity to have his say as part of that process.”

Comments(2)

TheTruthHurts says...
11:07am Sat 2 Mar 13

He is right. This was obviously an important meeting and after hearing James Alexander talk about all these tough decisions and all that it just seems wrong that the greens weren't able to at least have their say. And that the labour proposal wasn't debated.

Tracey Simpson laing should be ashamed of herself too. Not only are her words hypocritical. She then goes to show complete disrespect by pretty much saying she couldn't be bothered to stay later. 1am? it would have been an additional 45mins at best.

TSL the job you should be doing is rather important and if it's too much hassle for you to do it properly then you should have a long hard think about whether you should be doing it at all.

mallory says...
11:51am Sat 2 Mar 13

From Cllr Alexander:

"I explained by extending meeting we would have Cllrs who would have to leave because of child care - skewing vote"

see twitter thread here: "https://twitter.com
/jmalexander1982/sta
tus/3074194998570680
32"

so when Cllr Simpson-Lang says "some councillors are carers" that must have been a mistake, did she mean "parents"? Presumably, and i am making an assumption here, "parents" from single-parent homes?

Perhaps a creche would enable the majority party "to speak positively" about their budget? And perhaps more importanly, allow the people who voted for the two green councillors to have their voice heard in this important meeting?

to summarise: a significant number of York Residents were denied the opportunity to have their voice heard in this meeting because a number of councillors, enough to "skew" the vote if they werent present , were incapable of organising adequate child care.

I seriousy question these anonymous councillors suitabiity for their role.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree