Government dismisses public inquiry call for £1.4bn waste incinerator at Allerton Park

Protesters against the incinerator plan for Allerton Park outside County Hall in Northallerton in October Protesters against the incinerator plan for Allerton Park outside County Hall in Northallerton in October

CONTROVERSIAL plans for a £1.4bn waste park and incinerator have moved closer to being launched, after the Government has decided not to hold a public inquiry.

The Department of Communities and Local Government has confirmed it will not call in the North Yorkshire County Council and City of York Council plan to create a site at Allerton Park, near Knaresborough, to deal with up to 320,000 tonnes of rubbish a year.

County council leader Councillor John Weighell said he was delighted with the decision, but the scheme at the site alongside the A1 would be put on hold until after the outcome of a possible challenge from objectors.

He said: "We never really doubted that this would be the situation." County councillor highways chief and Thirsk councillor Gareth Dadd said both the planning and business cases for the incinerator had been compelling.

He said: “I am very pleased that local democracy has prevailed.”

Objectors to the scheme had said they were confident Communities Secretary Eric Pickles would hold a Planning Inspectorate hearing into the scheme, which is due to start processing waste in 2015.

Bob Schofield, spokesman for North Yorkshire Waste Action Group, said it would examine every possible avenue to block the scheme, which they say is too big, too expensive and environmentally unsustainable.

Mr Schofield said: “This is extremely disappointing, particularly as Eric Pickles has called in other incinerator schemes.

“We have been discussing the possibility of a judicial review. We don’t feel North Yorkshire County Council has engaged with the public about the financial side of the scheme.

“The council has let down its own electorate at a time when services are being cut back and by dropping this scheme it could be saving money.”

North Yorkshire County Council's planning committee approved the scheme in October after years of debate, thousands of objections and an eight-hour meeting.

Developers AmeyCespa, which has a 25-year contract to treat the county's waste, say the incinerator will use up-to-date technology and will save money, including landfill taxes, generate electricity, help meet recycling targets and could heat nearby homes.

Comments(5)

JHardacre says...
4:23pm Wed 30 Jan 13

Good. We do not need an inquiry for everything - that's why we have planning departments. The money saved by not having this or any other inquiry might pay for a few potholes to be filled instead.

Jonault says...
5:15pm Wed 30 Jan 13

Here in Shrewsbury, our council signed a 27 year waste disposal contract with a company called Veolia. Within the contract there was a clause that stated that if a plan for an incinerator was turned down, the cost of the appeal would be bourn by the local council tax payers. Our planning committee twice turned down the plans but Veolia brought in someone from London to rubber stamp the plans despite objections from locals and the planning committee.
We heard how the incinerator will produce electricity to power homes but that won't be for free, that will be extra profit for the owners. In Shrewsbury we do not produce enough waste to sustain an incinerator so I am sure that Veolia will be getting paid by other areas to burn their waste here.
Nobody on the council has been disciplined for writing such a biased contract that has cost us locals so dearly.

FieryJack says...
5:59pm Wed 30 Jan 13

Sounds very much like North Yorks, Jonault. The company ensured that should the plans be turned down, the council will bear a financial penalty. Lo and behold, the council's own planning dept did not turn down the council's own application.
The whole process has been riddled with such eyebrow-raising behaviour from the off. The taxpayers bear the risk, the company makes the profits. This seems to be the way now in the UK. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens get lost in the smog. The current Private Eye carries two stories about conflicts of interest around current incinerator applications (of which there are 120) and the way health fears have been circumvented by vested interests and company stooges. The scenarios are similar around the country.

twotonethomas says...
7:05pm Wed 30 Jan 13

JHardacre wrote:
Good. We do not need an inquiry for everything - that's why we have planning departments. The money saved by not having this or any other inquiry might pay for a few potholes to be filled instead.
Spot on JHardacre, if you can't trust your Councillors who can you trust?

Please see the Ryedale District Council/Wentworth Street car park planning application to learn what happens when unbiased inspectors get involved!

pedalling paul says...
9:24am Thu 31 Jan 13

Visit www.freightonrail.or
g.uk/CaseStudyWasteB
yRail.htm to see the "rail" alternative.
Incidentally Edinburgh's rail-served waste transfer depot at Powderhall was originally conceived as an incinerator, but never entered service.
A pity that this development was located on the A1, hence wholly road-served.
A Binliner train service to take N Yorkhire's compacted post-recycling refuse to remote landfill sites across the UK, would be much more effective.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree