Government dismisses £1.4bn incinerator public inquiry call (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Government dismisses public inquiry call for £1.4bn waste incinerator at Allerton Park
3:07pm Wednesday 30th January 2013 in News
Protesters against the incinerator plan for Allerton Park outside County Hall in Northallerton in October
CONTROVERSIAL plans for a £1.4bn waste park and incinerator have moved closer to being launched, after the Government has decided not to hold a public inquiry.
The Department of Communities and Local Government has confirmed it will not call in the North Yorkshire County Council and City of York Council plan to create a site at Allerton Park, near Knaresborough, to deal with up to 320,000 tonnes of rubbish a year.
County council leader Councillor John Weighell said he was delighted with the decision, but the scheme at the site alongside the A1 would be put on hold until after the outcome of a possible challenge from objectors.
He said: "We never really doubted that this would be the situation." County councillor highways chief and Thirsk councillor Gareth Dadd said both the planning and business cases for the incinerator had been compelling.
He said: “I am very pleased that local democracy has prevailed.”
Objectors to the scheme had said they were confident Communities Secretary Eric Pickles would hold a Planning Inspectorate hearing into the scheme, which is due to start processing waste in 2015.
Bob Schofield, spokesman for North Yorkshire Waste Action Group, said it would examine every possible avenue to block the scheme, which they say is too big, too expensive and environmentally unsustainable.
Mr Schofield said: “This is extremely disappointing, particularly as Eric Pickles has called in other incinerator schemes.
“We have been discussing the possibility of a judicial review. We don’t feel North Yorkshire County Council has engaged with the public about the financial side of the scheme.
“The council has let down its own electorate at a time when services are being cut back and by dropping this scheme it could be saving money.”
North Yorkshire County Council's planning committee approved the scheme in October after years of debate, thousands of objections and an eight-hour meeting.
Developers AmeyCespa, which has a 25-year contract to treat the county's waste, say the incinerator will use up-to-date technology and will save money, including landfill taxes, generate electricity, help meet recycling targets and could heat nearby homes.
Comments(5)
Jonault
says...
5:15pm Wed 30 Jan 13
We heard how the incinerator will produce electricity to power homes but that won't be for free, that will be extra profit for the owners. In Shrewsbury we do not produce enough waste to sustain an incinerator so I am sure that Veolia will be getting paid by other areas to burn their waste here.
Nobody on the council has been disciplined for writing such a biased contract that has cost us locals so dearly.
FieryJack
says...
5:59pm Wed 30 Jan 13
The whole process has been riddled with such eyebrow-raising behaviour from the off. The taxpayers bear the risk, the company makes the profits. This seems to be the way now in the UK. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens get lost in the smog. The current Private Eye carries two stories about conflicts of interest around current incinerator applications (of which there are 120) and the way health fears have been circumvented by vested interests and company stooges. The scenarios are similar around the country.
twotonethomas
says...
7:05pm Wed 30 Jan 13
JHardacre wrote:Spot on JHardacre, if you can't trust your Councillors who can you trust?
Good. We do not need an inquiry for everything - that's why we have planning departments. The money saved by not having this or any other inquiry might pay for a few potholes to be filled instead.
Please see the Ryedale District Council/Wentworth Street car park planning application to learn what happens when unbiased inspectors get involved!
pedalling paul
says...
9:24am Thu 31 Jan 13
g.uk/CaseStudyWasteB
yRail.htm to see the "rail" alternative.
Incidentally Edinburgh's rail-served waste transfer depot at Powderhall was originally conceived as an incinerator, but never entered service.
A pity that this development was located on the A1, hence wholly road-served.
A Binliner train service to take N Yorkhire's compacted post-recycling refuse to remote landfill sites across the UK, would be much more effective.
JHardacre says...
4:23pm Wed 30 Jan 13